Cited by 86

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hepatobiliary and pancreatic: Comparison between Chinese herbal medicine and Western medicine-induced liver injury of 1985 patients

Zhu, Yun, Niu, Ming, Chen, Jing, Zou, Zheng‐sheng, Ma, Zhi‐jie, Liu, Shu‐hong, Wang, Rui‐lin, He, Ting‐ting, Song, Hai‐bo, Wang, Zhong‐xia, Pu, Shi‐biao, Ma, Xiao, Wang, Li‐fu, Bai, Zhao‐fang, Zhao, Yan‐ling, Li, Yong‐gang, Wang, Jia‐bo, Xiao, Xiao‐he, on behalf of The Specialized Committee for Drug‐Induced Liver Diseases, Division of Drug‐Induced Diseases, Chinese Pharmacological Society·2016·Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Abstract

Background and Aim: Chinese herbal medicine (CHM), as well as Western medicine (WM), is an important cause of drug‐induced liver injury (DILI). However, the differences between CHM and WM as agents implicated in liver injury have rarely been reported. Methods: Overall, 1985 (2.05%) DILI cases were retrospectively collected from the 96 857 patients hospitalized because of liver dysfunction in the 302 Military Hospital between January 2009 and January 2014. Results: In all the enrolled patients with DILI, CHM was implicated in 563 cases (28.4%), while 870 cases (43.8%) were caused by WM and the remaining patients (27.8%) by the combination of WM and CHM. Polygonum multiflorum was the major implicated CHM. Compared with WM, the cases caused by CHM showed more female (51 vs 71%, P < 0.001) and positive rechallenge (6.1 vs 8.9%, P = 0.046), a much greater proportion of hepatocellular injury (62.2 vs 88.5%, P < 0.001), and a higher mortality (2.8 vs 4.8%, P = 0.042); however, no differences in the rates of chronic DILI and ALF were found (12.9 vs 12.4%, P = 0.807; 7.6 vs 7.6%, P = 0.971). Based on Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method, 75.6% of cases caused by CHM were classified as probable and only 16.6% as highly probable, significantly different from WM (38.4 and 60.3%, all P < 0.001). Conclusions: The causal relationship between CHM and liver injury is much complex, and the clinical characteristics of DILI caused by CHM differ from those caused by WM.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jgh.13323

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.01019.x · DOI
  2. 10.1002/hep.21324 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/ajg.2014.131 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.02.016 · DOI
  5. 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32835f6889 · DOI
  6. Cooperative Group of Hepatobiliary Disease of Digestive Disease Branch of Chinese Medical Association, 2007, A multicenter survey on hospital inpatients with drug‐induced acute liver injury in China, Chin. J. Dig., 27, 439
  7. Hepatobiliary Collaborative Group, Chinese Society of Gastroenterology, 2013, National multi‐centers survey on inpatients with acute severe drug‐induced liver injury, Chin. J. Dig., 33, 80
  8. 10.1002/lt.21692 · DOI
  9. 10.3389/fphar.2015.00072 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1111/apt.12109 · DOI
  11. Teschke R, 2014, Traditional Chinese Medicine induced liver injury, J. Clin. Translat Hepatol., 2, 80
  12. 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.09.011 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/0168-8278(90)90124-A · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90101-6 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/j.gastro.2005.05.006 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S1665-2681(19)30796-3 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.07.031 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1081/DMR-120028426 · DOI
  19. 10.3109/15563650.2010.527851 · DOI
  20. Dai HF, 2006, Hepatic veno‐occlusive disease induced by Gymura segetum: report of two cases, Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Dis. Int., 5, 406
  21. 10.1080/15563650903059136 · DOI
  22. Hu YY, 2012, Chinese herb and drug‐induced liver injury, Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi, 20, 173
  23. 10.1371/journal.pone.0024498 · DOI
  24. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03111.x · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.07.030 · DOI
  26. 10.3109/15563650.2010.537662 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1517/14740338.2013.774371 · DOI
  28. 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2002.00999.x · DOI
  29. 10.1111/apt.12798 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1056/NEJMp048083 · DOI
  31. 10.1055/s-0034-1375958 · DOI
  32. 10.3748/wjg.v19.i19.2864 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.dld.2013.10.020 · DOI
  34. 10.4254/wjh.v5.i7.353 · DOI
  35. 10.1007/s11684-015-0417-8 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zhu, Y., Niu, M., Chen, J., Zou, Z., Ma, Z., Liu, S., Wang, R., He, T., Song, H., Wang, Z., Pu, S., Ma, X., Wang, L., Bai, Z., Zhao, Y., Li, Y., Wang, J., Xiao, X., & on behalf of The Specialized Committee for Drug‐Induced Liver Diseases, D. O. D. D.
Affiliations
  • China Military Institute of Chinese Medicine 302 Military Hospital Beijing China
  • Diagnosis and Treatment Center for Non‐infectious Diseases 302 Military Hospital Beijing China
  • Department of Pathology 302 Military Hospital Beijing China
  • Department of traditional Chinese medicine 302 Military Hospital Beijing China
  • Integrative Medical Center 302 Military Hospital Beijing China
  • Center for Drug Reevaluation China Food and Drug Administration Beijing China
Venue
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-08
Volume
31
Issue
8
Pages
1476-1482
ISSN
  • 0815-9319
  • 1440-1746
Cited by
86
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review