Cited by 255Salivary Gland Disorders and FunctionsHIV/AIDS oral health manifestationsDysphagia Assessment and Management

Meta‐Analysis of Salivary Flow Rates in Young and Older Adults

Affoo, Rebecca H., Foley, Norine, Garrick, Rushlee, Siqueira, Walter L., Martin, Ruth E.·2015·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether salivary flow decreases as a function of aging. Design: Meta‐analysis. Setting: Literature review. Participants: Individuals aged 18 and older reported to be free of major systemic disease. Measurements: Relevant studies were identified through a literature search of several databases, from their inception to June 2013. Studies were included if saliva had been collected on at least one occasion in subjects aged 18 and older and if the data were presented in a manner that enabled comparisons of younger and older participants. Differences in salivary flow rates between age groups were calculated for each salivary source and condition and reported as standardized mean differences ( SMD s), standard errors ( SE s) and 95% confidence intervals ( CI s). The results were pooled using a random effects model. A separate analysis examining medication use was also conducted. Results: Forty‐seven studies were included. Whole ( SMD = 0.551, SE = 0.056, 95% CI = 0.423–0.678, P < .001) and submandibular and sublingual ( SMSL ) ( SMD = 0.582, SE = 0.123, 95% CI = 0.341–0.823, P < .001) salivary flow rates were reduced significantly in older participants and in unstimulated and stimulated conditions. In contrast, parotid and minor gland salivary flow rates were not significantly reduced with increasing age. Additionally, unstimulated and stimulated SMSL , and unstimulated whole salivary flow rates were significantly lower in older adults, regardless of medication usage. Conclusion: The aging process is associated with reduced salivary flow in a salivary‐gland–specific manner; this reduction in salivary flow cannot be explained on the basis of medications. These findings have important clinical implications for maintaining optimal oral health in older adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jgs.13652

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Affoo, R. H., Foley, N., Garrick, R., Siqueira, W. L., & Martin, R. E.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
Martin, Ruth E.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-10
Volume
63
Issue
10
Pages
2142-2151
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1921938942
Cited by
255
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Salivary Gland Disorders and Functions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › HIV/AIDS oral health manifestations
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Keywords
salivary flow rate, aging, older adults, parotid gland, minor salivary glands, unstimulated saliva, stimulated saliva, oral health in older adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aging, Humans, Oral Health, Parotid Gland, Saliva, Secretory Rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review