Cited by 2Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesAging and Gerontology Research

Preserving Cognition in Older African Americans with Mild Cognitive Impairment

Open access
Rovner, Barry W., Casten, Robin J.·2016·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

To the Editor: Twenty-five percent of older adults in the United States have type 2 diabetes mellitus, which increases their risk for cognitive decline.1, 2 This risk disproportionately affects African Americans because they have higher rates of diabetes mellitus than whites and worse glycemic control, which magnifies their risk.3 These disparities contribute to why African Americans have twice the rate of Alzheimer's disease as whites.4 There are now 1 million older African Americans with diabetes mellitus in the United States, and their number will double by 2030.5 This will multiply the burden of cognitive impairment in older African Americans and necessitates preventive interventions. A randomized controlled trial is being conducted to test the efficacy of behavioral activation to reduce cognitive decline in African Americans with mild cognitive impairment. Behavioral activation is a standardized, evidence-based treatment often used to treat depression.6 This approach has been applied to increase participation in physical, cognitive, and social activities to preserve cognition. Controls received supportive therapy, which facilitates personal expression but contains no other active elements. Race-concordant community health workers deliver six in-home treatment sessions of both interventions. Because the relationship between diabetes mellitus and cognition is of interest, treatment effects on a subgroup of participants with diabetes mellitus who have had 12-month assessments were examined (n = 35). The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test—Revised, Delayed Recall (HVLT) and the Uniform Data Set (UDS) Neuropsychological Battery, which includes tests assessing verbal memory, attention, semantic memory, language, processing speed, visuospatial ability, and executive function, were administered (masked to treatment assignment) at baseline and 12 months. Standardized z scores from the component UDS tests yield the UDS composite score (UDS-CS), which reflects global cognition. The pilot data indicate that a decrement of 0.45 UDS-CS points translates clinically to inability to balance a checkbook, do laundry, shop, or prepare meals. The average age of participants was 75.1 ± 6.8; 28 (80%) were female. Table 1 shows that the scores of participants who received behavioral activation improved over 12 months in two cognitive domains: episodic memory (HVLT score) and executive function and processing speed (Digit Symbol Substitution Test). Supportive therapy controls had no comparable improvements. A greater proportion of participants who received behavioral activation than of controls improved by 0.45 points or more on the UDS-CS (40.0% vs 21.1%; odds ratio (OR) = 2.50, 955 CI = 0.55–11.33), and fewer declined by 0.45 points or more (6.7% vs 21.1%; OR = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.03—2.70). There were no significant changes in other neuropsychological test scores. The treatment trends observed for three cognitive measures in this sample of older African Americans with diabetes mellitus and mild cognitive impairment suggest that behavioral activation may preserve cognition in this high-risk group, although the sample was small, and the analysis was underpowered to detect treatment group differences. Nevertheless, these preliminary findings concur with the results of previous studies indicating that physical, cognitive, and social activity may prevent cognitive decline and extend these findings to older African Americans with diabetes mellitus.7 The latter finding is important because the number and longevity of this population, and their risk of progressive cognitive decline and dementia, are increasing. The behavioral activation treatment approach targets two entrenched health problems in older African Americans simultaneously (diabetes and impaired cognition) and may prevent cognitive decline by increasing cognitive (e.g., problem-solving) and physical (e.g., exercise) activities and perhaps by improving glycemic control. These two mechanisms are plausible because physical and cognitive inactivity, as well as poor glycemic control, increase the risk of cognitive decline.8, 9 Because there is no disease-modifying treatment for Alzheimer's disease, if an early nonpharmacological treatment such as behavioral activation delays cognitive decline even by 1 year, it will greatly reduce the personal and societal costs of Alzheimer's disease in older African Americans.10 This research is supported by Grant 1R01AG035025 from the National Institute on Aging. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01299766 Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no competing interests. Author Contributions: Rovner, Casten: study concept and design, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript preparation. Sponsor's Role: None.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jgs.14012

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With regard to mood, well-being and quality of life, no therapeutic effects in MCI patients, neither at short-term (3 months) nor at long-term (24 months) follow-up, were detected in most studies, including four randomized controlled trials and one randomized non-controlled trial.

    “With regard to mood, well-being and quality of life no therapeutic effects in MCI patients, neither at short-term (3 months) nor at long-term (24 months) follow-up, were detected in most studies, including four randomized controlled trials [48–51, 54, 59, 60] and one randomized non-controlled trial [52, 53].”

    From Psychotherapeutic interventions in individuals at risk for Alzheimer’s dementia: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [51]

    The To the Editor section identifies this work as a randomized controlled trial in African Americans with mild cognitive impairment. Its reported results concern cognition at 12 months, not mood, well-being, or quality of life at 3 or 24 months. It therefore supports identifying the cited work as a trial, but not the claimed absence of therapeutic effects on those outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Long-term follow-up assessments (6 or more months post-intervention) were described in 14 publications.

    “Long-term follow-up assessments (6 or more months post-intervention) were described in 14 publications [37, 39, 43, 48, 49, 51–53, 59, 60, 62, 63, 68, 69].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rovner, B. W., & Casten, R. J.
Affiliations
Thomas Jefferson University (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-03
Volume
64
Issue
3
Pages
659-661
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2300643612
Cited by
2
References
9
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • The Medicine Forum (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (1R01AG035025)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
mild cognitive impairment, behavioral activation, type 2 diabetes, African Americans, cognitive decline prevention, community health workers, supportive therapy, executive function, processing speed, episodic memory, older adults, home-based intervention, glycemic control, Alzheimer's disease risk, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised
MeSH terms
Aged, Behavior Therapy, Black or African American, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review