Cited by 11Chronic Disease Management StrategiesDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Treatment and Management

Data-driven classification of health status of older adults with diabetes: the diabetes and aging study

Open access
Huang, Elbert S., Liu, Jennifer Y., Lipska, Kasia J., Grant, Richard W., Laiteerapong, Neda, Moffet, Howard H., Schumm, L. Philip, Karter, Andrew J.·2023·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Background We set out to identify empirically-derived health status classes of older adults with diabetes based on clusters of comorbid conditions which are associated with future complications. Methods We conducted a cohort study among 105,786 older (≥65 years of age) adults with type 2 diabetes enrolled in an integrated healthcare delivery system. We used latent class analysis of 19 baseline comorbidities to derive health status classes and then compared incident complication rates (events per 100 person-years) by health status class during 5 years of follow-up. Complications included infections, hyperglycemic events, hypoglycemic events, microvascular events, cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality. Results Three health status classes were identified: Class 1 (58% of the cohort) had the lowest prevalence of most baseline comorbidities, Class 2 (22%) had the highest prevalence of obesity, arthritis, and depression, and Class 3 (20%) had the highest prevalence of cardiovascular conditions. The risk for incident complications was highest for Class 3, intermediate for Class 2 and lowest for Class 1. For example, the age, sex and race-adjusted rates for cardiovascular events (per 100 person-years) for Class 3, Class 2 and Class 1 were 6.5, 2.3, and 1.6, respectively; 2.1, 1.2, 0.7 for hypoglycemia; and 8.0, 3.8, and 2.3 for mortality. Conclusions Three health status classes of older adults with diabetes were identified based on prevalent comorbidities and were associated…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jgs.18310

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compared with the healthy class, the cardiovascular class has the highest risk of frailty and subsequent mortality.

    “Compared with the healthy class, the cardiovascular class has the highest risk of frailty and subsequent mortality.”
  • The geriatric class has the highest prevalence of obesity, hypertension, arthritis, and incontinence, and the cardiovascular class has the highest prevalence of myocardial infarctions, heart failure, and stroke.

    “The geriatric class has the highest prevalence of obesity, hypertension, arthritis, and incontinence, and the cardiovascular class has the highest prevalence of myocardial infarctions, heart failure, and stroke.”
  • Ongoing empiric research on the classification of older adults with diabetes based on comorbid illness has repeatedly found three major classes of patients: a healthy, a geriatric, and a cardiovascular class.

    “Ongoing empiric research on the classification of older adults with diabetes based on comorbid illness has repeatedly found three major classes of patients: a healthy, a geriatric, and a cardiovascular class (9,61,66).”
  • Ongoing empiric research on the classification of older adults with diabetes based on comorbid illness has repeatedly found three major classes: a healthy, a geriatric, and a cardiovascular class.

    “Ongoing empiric research on the classification of older adults with diabetes based on comorbid illness has repeatedly found three major classes of individuals: a healthy, a geriatric, and a cardiovascular class (10,63,68).”

    From 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [68]

  • Compared with the healthy class, the cardiovascular class has the highest risk of frailty and subsequent mortality.

    “Compared with the healthy class, the cardiovascular class has the highest risk of frailty and subsequent mortality.”

    From 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [75]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, E. S., Liu, J. Y., Lipska, K. J., Grant, R. W., Laiteerapong, N., Moffet, H. H., Schumm, L. P., & Karter, A. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Huang, Elbert S.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-03-08
Volume
71
Issue
7
Pages
2120-2130
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W4323532335
Cited by
11
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Knowledge@UChicago (University of Chicago) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Chicago
Funders
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30 DK092924, P30 DK092949)
  • National Institute on Aging (K24AG069080, R01 AG063391)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, older adults, comorbidities, latent class analysis, diabetes complications, cardiovascular events, hypoglycemia, all-cause mortality, obesity, arthritis, depression
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Health Status, Humans, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review