Cited by 8Diabetes Treatment and ManagementPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesDiabetes Management and Research

Should the Incretin hype be the same for older adults: Promise + cautions

Open access
Batsis, John A., Porter Starr, Kathryn N., Villareal, Dennis T.·2024·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

There are no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jgs.18816

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Older adults are at risk of worsening age-related sarcopenia and osteoporosis and were largely underrepresented in landmark incretin clinical trials.

    “This is especially true for older adults, who are at risk of worsening age-related sarcopenia and osteoporosis and were largely underrepresented in the study populations for these landmark clinical trials (44).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Batsis, J. A., Porter Starr, K. N., & Villareal, D. T.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC) Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System Durham North Carolina USA
  • Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Batsis, John A.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-02-23
Volume
72
Issue
7
Pages
2266-2268
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W4392111560
Cited by
8
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R01‐AG077163)
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 CX002161)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01‐DK109950)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
incretins, older adults, glycemic control, GLP-1 receptor agonists, DPP-4 inhibitors
MeSH terms
Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1, Incretins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review