The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prehabilitation Interventions in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Abstract
Background: Surgical resection is the primary treatment modality for colorectal cancer. Prehabilitation is about enhancing the patient's physiological capacity preoperatively to reduce the risk of treatment‐related complications. Clear definitions of the modality, content, and duration of prehabilitation, including its components such as nutrition, exercise, and psychological support, are lacking. Some review articles have proposed that a multimodal approach may yield the best overall outcomes, but the clinical efficacy of such an approach requires further exploration. Objective: This study consisted of a systematic review and meta‐analysis to investigate the effectiveness of multimodal prehabilitation programs for patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library from inception to August 5, 2023, without language or publication period restrictions. The included studies were randomized controlled trials, prospective studies, or retrospective studies that examined the effectiveness of multimodal prehabilitation programs for patients undergoing colorectal surgery. A random‐effects model was used for data analysis. Results: This study included 14 articles that analyzed data from 2314 patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery. In comparisons against a control group, multimodal prehabilitation significantly reduced the length of hospital stay ([mean difference; MD] = −2.47 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] [−3.56, −1.39]), postoperative complication rate (odds ratio; [OR] = 0.74, 95% CI [0.59, 0.94]), and time to the first passage of flatus (MD = −0.43 days, 95% CI [−0.66, −0.20]). Conclusion: Multimodal prehabilitation interventions before colorectal cancer surgery reduce hospital stay lengths, lower complication rates, and promote bowel recovery, particularly in older populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Luo, D., Wan, X., Liu, J., & Tong, T. (2018) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0962280216669183 · Cited by 4,066
Bauer, J., Biolo, G., Cederholm, T., Cesari, M., Cruz-Jentoft, A. J., Morley, J. E., Phillips, S., Sieber, C., Stehle, P., Teta, D., et al. (2013) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2013.05.021 · Cited by 2,553 · cited 1×
“Older adults with acute or chronic medical conditions typically require an increased dietary protein intake (i.e., 1.2–1.5 g/kg body weight/day) [64].”
InfluentialGillis, C., Li, C., Lee, L., Awasthi, R., Augustin, B., Gamsa, A., Liberman, A. S., Stein, B., Charlebois, P., Feldman, L. S., et al. (2014) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0000000000000393 · Cited by 876
McDonald, S., Yates, D., Durrand, J. W., Kothmann, E., Sniehotta, F. F., Habgood, A., Colling, K., Hollingsworth, A., & Danjoux, G. (2019) · Anaesthesia · doi:10.1111/anae.14826 · Cited by 68
Research works printed but not linked: 65
- 10.5114/pg.2018.81072 · DOI
- 10.46234/ccdcw2021.160 · DOI
- 10.3322/caac.21772 · DOI
- 10.1093/bja/85.1.109 · DOI
- 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000407 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jgo.2016.06.001 · DOI
- 10.3390/cancers13225852 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12877‐021‐02683‐z · DOI
- 10.1186/1471‐2482‐12‐s1‐s20 · DOI
- 10.1245/s10434‐016‐5226‐z · DOI
- 10.1093/bja/78.5.606 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bja.2021.12.007 · DOI
- 10.3390/cancers14205017 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.044 · DOI
- 10.1245/s10434‐022‐12623‐9 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00520‐023‐07585‐x · DOI
- 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.05.012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3393/ac.2022.01095.1056 · DOI
- 10.3389/fonc.2022.958261 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00432‐022‐04088‐w · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.09.030 · DOI
- 10.1002/bjs5.102 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/02763869.2019.1588072 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.11124/jbies‐22‐00125 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/1471‐2288‐14‐135 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/1471‐2288‐5‐13 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/jrsm.1429 · DOI
- Higgins J. P., 2011, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. Cochrane Handbook Org
- 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1423180 · DOI
- 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.5474 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/anae.15215 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00520‐021‐06343‐1 · DOI
- 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.0198 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.12102/j.issn.1009‐6493.2022.18.007 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cireng.2022.06.026 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.033 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00423‐022‐02487‐8 · DOI
- 10.1002/ncp.10787 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00464‐012‐2560‐5 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ciresp.2020.03.023 · DOI
- 10.1097/phm.0000000000001221 · DOI
- 10.1590/s0004‐2803.201800000‐85 · DOI
- 10.3389/fonc.2024.1411817 · DOI
- 10.1111/anae.14505 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.04.024 · DOI
- 10.1093/annonc/mdu540 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/ans.16941 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101513 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00520‐019‐05019‐1 · DOI
- 10.1097/sla.0000000000003967 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.12.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.04.011 · DOI
- 10.1080/08941939.2018.1524528 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00423‐016‐1485‐1 · DOI
- 10.34175/jno202004002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.01.021 · DOI
- 10.1002/cncr.32437 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.02.005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00384‐014‐1914‐y · DOI
- 10.1186/s12916‐017‐0986‐2 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12885‐019‐6472‐9 · DOI
- 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003950 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.scrs.2020.10077 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Liao, Y., Chiu, H., Huang, F., Chang, Y., Huang, Y., Wei, P., Wang, W., Hung, C., & Tung, H.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-03-13
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2262-2277
- ISSN
- 0002-8614
- 1532-5415
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prehabilitation Interventions in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jgs.19425
- The paper
- Liao, Y., Chiu, H., Huang, F., Chang, Y., Huang, Y., Wei, P., Wang, W., Hung, C., & Tung, H. (2025). Prehabilitation Interventions in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19425