Cited by 34

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prehabilitation Interventions in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Liao, Yi‐Shu, Chiu, Hsiao‐Yean, Huang, Fu‐Huan, Chang, Yu‐Han, Huang, Yu‐Min, Wei, Po‐Li, Wang, Weu, Hung, Chin‐Sheng, Tung, Heng‐Hsin·2025·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Background: Surgical resection is the primary treatment modality for colorectal cancer. Prehabilitation is about enhancing the patient's physiological capacity preoperatively to reduce the risk of treatment‐related complications. Clear definitions of the modality, content, and duration of prehabilitation, including its components such as nutrition, exercise, and psychological support, are lacking. Some review articles have proposed that a multimodal approach may yield the best overall outcomes, but the clinical efficacy of such an approach requires further exploration. Objective: This study consisted of a systematic review and meta‐analysis to investigate the effectiveness of multimodal prehabilitation programs for patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library from inception to August 5, 2023, without language or publication period restrictions. The included studies were randomized controlled trials, prospective studies, or retrospective studies that examined the effectiveness of multimodal prehabilitation programs for patients undergoing colorectal surgery. A random‐effects model was used for data analysis. Results: This study included 14 articles that analyzed data from 2314 patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery. In comparisons against a control group, multimodal prehabilitation significantly reduced the length of hospital stay ([mean difference; MD] = −2.47 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] [−3.56, −1.39]), postoperative complication rate (odds ratio; [OR] = 0.74, 95% CI [0.59, 0.94]), and time to the first passage of flatus (MD = −0.43 days, 95% CI [−0.66, −0.20]). Conclusion: Multimodal prehabilitation interventions before colorectal cancer surgery reduce hospital stay lengths, lower complication rates, and promote bowel recovery, particularly in older populations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jgs.19425

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 65

  1. 10.5114/pg.2018.81072 · DOI
  2. 10.46234/ccdcw2021.160 · DOI
  3. 10.3322/caac.21772 · DOI
  4. 10.1093/bja/85.1.109 · DOI
  5. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000407 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.jgo.2016.06.001 · DOI
  7. 10.3390/cancers13225852 · DOI
  8. 10.1186/s12877‐021‐02683‐z · DOI
  9. 10.1186/1471‐2482‐12‐s1‐s20 · DOI
  10. 10.1245/s10434‐016‐5226‐z · DOI
  11. 10.1093/bja/78.5.606 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.bja.2021.12.007 · DOI
  13. 10.3390/cancers14205017 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.044 · DOI
  15. 10.1245/s10434‐022‐12623‐9 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s00520‐023‐07585‐x · DOI
  17. 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.05.012 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.3393/ac.2022.01095.1056 · DOI
  19. 10.3389/fonc.2022.958261 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/s00432‐022‐04088‐w · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.09.030 · DOI
  22. 10.1002/bjs5.102 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1080/02763869.2019.1588072 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.11124/jbies‐22‐00125 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1186/1471‐2288‐14‐135 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1186/1471‐2288‐5‐13 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1002/jrsm.1429 · DOI
  29. Higgins J. P., 2011, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. Cochrane Handbook Org
  30. 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1423180 · DOI
  32. 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.5474 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1111/anae.15215 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/s00520‐021‐06343‐1 · DOI
  35. 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.0198 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.12102/j.issn.1009‐6493.2022.18.007 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.cireng.2022.06.026 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.033 · DOI
  39. 10.1007/s00423‐022‐02487‐8 · DOI
  40. 10.1002/ncp.10787 · DOI
  41. 10.1007/s00464‐012‐2560‐5 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.ciresp.2020.03.023 · DOI
  43. 10.1097/phm.0000000000001221 · DOI
  44. 10.1590/s0004‐2803.201800000‐85 · DOI
  45. 10.3389/fonc.2024.1411817 · DOI
  46. 10.1111/anae.14505 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.04.024 · DOI
  48. 10.1093/annonc/mdu540 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1111/ans.16941 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101513 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1007/s00520‐019‐05019‐1 · DOI
  52. 10.1097/sla.0000000000003967 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.12.006 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.04.011 · DOI
  55. 10.1080/08941939.2018.1524528 · DOI
  56. 10.1007/s00423‐016‐1485‐1 · DOI
  57. 10.34175/jno202004002 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.01.021 · DOI
  59. 10.1002/cncr.32437 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.02.005 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1007/s00384‐014‐1914‐y · DOI
  62. 10.1186/s12916‐017‐0986‐2 · DOI
  63. 10.1186/s12885‐019‐6472‐9 · DOI
  64. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003950 · DOI
  65. 10.1016/j.scrs.2020.10077 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Liao, Y., Chiu, H., Huang, F., Chang, Y., Huang, Y., Wei, P., Wang, W., Hung, C., & Tung, H.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-03-13
Volume
73
Issue
7
Pages
2262-2277
ISSN
  • 0002-8614
  • 1532-5415
Cited by
34
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prehabilitation Interventions in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jgs.19425
The paper
Liao, Y., Chiu, H., Huang, F., Chang, Y., Huang, Y., Wei, P., Wang, W., Hung, C., & Tung, H. (2025). Prehabilitation Interventions in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19425