Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 6

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reliability and Validity of Nutrient Assessment Applications for Canadian Endurance Athletes: MyFitnessPal and Cronometer

Morello, Olivia, McPhee, Lucas, Kucab, Michaela, Bellissimo, Nick, Totosy de Zepetnek, Julia O.·2025·Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of the present observational study was to assess the inter‐rater reliability and validity of two free nutrition apps, MyFitnessPal (MFP) and Cronometer (CRO), among Canadian endurance athletes. Methods: Two raters independently input 43 three‐day food intake records (FIR) (27M/16F) into MFP and CRO, and one rater input each FIR into ESHA Food Processor® using the reference standard 2015 Canadian Nutrient File (CNF) database. Results: MFP showed a consistent difference in measurements between raters for total energy and carbohydrates (absolute reliability), but the difference was too small to be clinically meaningful; further, raters were inconsistent for sodium and sugar (relative reliability), particularly among men. MFP showed poor validity for total energy, carbohydrates, protein, cholesterol, sugar, and fibre, with discrepancies for total energy, carbohydrates and sugar being driven by women, and protein differences by men. Rationale for low reliability and validity may be due to the copious options for each food entry in MFP, including non‐verified consumer entries. Possible rationale for gender differences may be more detailed and descriptive FIRs (reliability) and generally more varied dietary patterns (validity) in women compared to men. Conversely, CRO showed good to excellent inter‐rater reliability for all nutrients and good validity for all nutrients except for fibre and vitamins A and D, with no differences between genders. Rationale for low validity of fibre may be due to how it is represented in the software (i.e., total vs. soluble), and rationale for vitamins A and D may be due to fortification practices differing between brands and countries. Bland‐Altman plots for inter‐rater reliability and validity revealed smaller bias, narrower LOAs, and better horizonal spread of data when using CRO compared to MFP. Conclusion: Given the unique energy and nutrient needs of athletes, they should be aware that MFP may provide dietary information that does not accurately reflect true intake, and that CRO could serve as a promising alternative.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jhn.70148

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 10.3390/jpm14030254 · DOI
  2. 10.2196/16953 · DOI
  3. 10.3148/75.1.2014.41 · DOI
  4. 10.2165/00007256-200131070-00007 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.2196/mhealth.3345 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.3390/nu12082214 · DOI
  7. 10.1093/advances/nmab058 · DOI
  8. 10.1017/S1368980018000393 · DOI
  9. 10.3389/fnut.2021.775163 · DOI
  10. 10.2196/mhealth.9232 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.nut.2018.05.003 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/1747-0080.12401 · DOI
  13. 10.2196/18237 · DOI
  14. 10.3390/nu12113327 · DOI
  15. 10.2196/mhealth.9838 · DOI
  16. 10.3390/nu9030200 · DOI
  17. 10.2196/35858 · DOI
  18. 10.3390/nu16152573 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/pst.382 · DOI
  20. Weir J. P., 2005, Quantifying Test‐Retest Reliability Using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient and the SEM, Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 19, 231
  21. 10.1016/0010-4825(89)90036-X · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/j.edurev.2010.12.001 · DOI
  23. 10.2196/54509 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009233 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000103 · DOI
  26. 10.1093/cdn/nzaa060_007 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.jand.2020.09.002 · DOI
  28. 10.1111/1747-0080.12401 · DOI
  29. 10.3389/fnut.2024.1348456 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Institude of Medicine, 2003, Dietary Reference Intakes: Guiding Principles for Nutrition Labeling and Fortification. Nutrition Reviews
  31. 10.3945/jn.115.219683 · DOI
  32. 10.1371/journal.pone.0280028 · DOI
  33. 10.17269/s41997-018-0043-8 · DOI
  34. 10.1080/17483107.2019.1701103 · DOI
  35. 10.24304/kjcp.2023.33.1.51 · DOI

Cited by

See all 6

Metadata

Authors
Morello, O., McPhee, L., Kucab, M., Bellissimo, N., & Totosy de Zepetnek, J. O.
Affiliations
  • School of Nutrition Toronto Metropolitan University Toronto Ontario Canada
  • Faculty of Kinesiology & Health Studies University of Regina Regina Saskatchewan Canada
Venue
Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-10
Volume
38
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 0952-3871
  • 1365-277X
Cited by
6
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reliability and Validity of Nutrient Assessment Applications for Canadian Endurance Athletes: MyFitnessPal and Cronometer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jhn.70148
The paper
Morello, O., McPhee, L., Kucab, M., Bellissimo, N., & Totosy de Zepetnek, J. O. (2025). Reliability and Validity of Nutrient Assessment Applications for Canadian Endurance Athletes: MyFitnessPal and Cronometer. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics. https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.70148

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.