Cited by 155Environmental Impact and SustainabilitySustainability and Ecological Systems AnalysisSustainable Development and Environmental Policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

The Concept of City Carbon Maps: A Case Study of Melbourne, Australia

Open access
Wiedmann, Thomas O., Chen, Guangwu, Barrett, John·2016·Journal of Industrial Ecology

Abstract

Summary: Cities are thought to be associated with most of humanity's consumption of natural resources and impacts on the environment. Cities not only constitute major centers of economic activity, knowledge, innovation, and governance—they are also said to be linked to approximately 70% to 80% of global carbon dioxide emissions. This makes cities primary agents of change in a resource‐ and carbon‐constraint world. In order to set meaningful targets, design successful policies, and implement effective mitigation strategies, it is important that greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions accounting for cities is accurate, comparable, comprehensive, and complete. Despite recent developments in the standardization of city GHG accounting, there is still a lack of consistent guidelines regarding out‐of‐boundary emissions, thus hampering efforts to identify mitigation priorities and responsibilities. We introduce a new conceptual framework—based on environmental input‐output analysis—that allows for a consistent and complete reconciliation of direct and indirect GHG emissions from a city. The “city carbon map” shows local, regional, national, and global origins and destinations of flows of embodied emissions. We test the carbon map concept by applying it to the greater metropolitan area of Melbourne, Australia. We discuss the results and limitations of the approach in the light of possible mitigation strategies and policies by different urban stakeholders.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jiec.12346

Cites

79 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 78 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Barrett J., 2007, A report to Scotland's Global Footprint project, Towards a low footprint Scotland—Living well, within our ecological limits
  2. BSI (British Standards Institute), 2008, PAS 2050:2008—Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services
  3. BSI (British Standards Institute), 2013, PAS 2070:2013 specification for the assessment of greenhouse gas emissions of a city—Direct plus supply chain and consumption‐based methodologies
  4. Calcott A., 2008, The ecological footprint of British city residents
  5. DECC (UK Department of Energy and Climate Change), 2014, Community energy strategy
  6. Eurostat, 2008, Eurostat manual of supply, use and input‐output tables, 2008 edition
  7. ICLEI, 2009, International Local Government GHG Emissions Analysis Protocol (IEAP)
  8. ISO (International Organization for Standardization), 2006, International Standard ISO 14040: Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Principles and framework
  9. James N., 2003, One planet living in the Thames gateway
  10. Leontief W., 1953, Studies in the structure of the American economy
  11. 10.1017/CBO9780511626982 · DOI
  12. Owen A., 2008, Ashford's footprint—Now and in the future
  13. World Bank, 2010, UN standard for GHG emissions of cities V2.1
  14. WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature), 2007, The right climate for change—Using the carbon footprint to reduce CO2 emission—A guide for local authorities
  15. Yao L., 2013, Carbon footprint accounting of regional household consumption in China through multi‐regional input‐output model, Huanjing Kexue Xuebao/Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 33, 2050

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–154 of 154

Metadata

Authors
Wiedmann, T. O., Chen, G., & Barrett, J.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Wiedmann, Thomas O.
Venue
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Published
2015-10-12
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
676-691
ISSN
  • 1088-1980 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-9290
OpenAlex
W1906176694
Cited by
155
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 11
FWCI
12.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Industrial Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • World Bank Group
  • Greater London Authority
  • World Resources Institute
  • University of Leeds
  • University of New South Wales
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/N022645/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
Keywords
urban greenhouse gas emissions, embodied emissions, environmentally extended input-output analysis, direct and indirect emissions, emissions accounting, carbon mitigation strategies, urban climate policy, Melbourne metropolitan area

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review