Cited by 310Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityAdditive Manufacturing Materials and Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

Environmental Dimensions of Additive Manufacturing: Mapping Application Domains and Their Environmental Implications

Open access

Abstract

Summary: Additive manufacturing (AM) proposes a novel paradigm for engineering design and manufacturing, which has profound economic, environmental, and security implications. The design freedom offered by this category of manufacturing processes and its ability to locally print almost each designable object will have important repercussions across society. While AM applications are progressing from rapid prototyping to the production of end‐use products, the environmental dimensions and related impacts of these evolving manufacturing processes have yet to be extensively examined. Only limited quantitative data are available on how AM manufactured products compare to conventionally manufactured ones in terms of energy and material consumption, transportation costs, pollution and waste, health and safety issues, as well as other environmental impacts over their full lifetime. Reported research indicates that the specific energy of current AM systems is 1 to 2 orders of magnitude higher compared to that of conventional manufacturing processes. However, only part of the AM process taxonomy is yet documented in terms of its environmental performance, and most life cycle inventory (LCI) efforts mainly focus on energy consumption. From an environmental perspective, AM manufactured parts can be beneficial for very small batches, or in cases where AM‐based redesigns offer substantial functional advantages during the product use phase (e.g., lightweight part designs and part remanufacturing). Important pending research questions include the LCI of AM feedstock production, supply‐chain consequences, and health and safety issues relating to AM.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jiec.12629

Cites

94 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 96 references

1 of the 96 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Campbell T., 2011, Strategic Foresight Report of the Atlantic Council of the United States
  2. Deak S. M., 1996, Rapid prototyping laboratory safety procedures
  3. Helms H., 2007, The potential contribution of light‐weighting to reduce transport energy consumption, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 12, 58
  4. Jones J., 2012, Proceedings of the 22nd International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, 8
  5. Kellens K. E.Yasa Renaldi W.Dewulf J. P.Kruth andJ. R.Duflou.2011a.Energy and resource efficiency of SLS/SLM processes. In Proceedings of the 22nd Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium 8–10 August Austin TX USA 1–16.
  6. Munsch M. E.Wycisk J.Kranz V.Seyda andE.Claus.2012.Functional products through laser additive manufacturing of TiAl6V4.Workshop LAM Laser Additive Manufacturing 2012 Houston TX29.02.2012.
  7. Nyamekye P., 2015, Case study: CNC machining and laser additive manufacturing
  8. Sirris.2013.Additive manufacturing workshop.www.interreg‐fred.eu/wp‐content/uploads/5_Sirris‐AdditiveManufacturing_Workshop_081013.pdf. Accessed February 2016.
  9. Tomlin M.andJ.Meyer.2011.Topology optimization of an additive layer manufactured (ALM) aerospace part. In Proceedings of the 7th Altair CAE Technology Conference 10 May Gaydon UK.
  10. Verma A.andR.Rai.2013.Energy efficient modeling and optimization of additive manufacturing processes. In Proceedings of the 24th International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium 12–14 August Austin TX USA 231–241.
  11. Walter M. J.Hölmstrom andH.Yrjölä.2004.Rapid manufacturing and its impact on supply chain management. In Proceedings of the Logistics Research Network Annual Conference 9–10 September Dublin.
  12. Weidema B. P., 2013, Overview and methodology. Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3. ecoinvent report 1(v3)
  13. WFD (Waste Framework Directive), 2008, European Union Directive: 2008/98/EC
  14. Wohlers Report, 2016, 3D printing and additive manufacturing state of industry—Annual worldwide progress report
  15. Xu X., 2014, Energy consumption model of binder‐jetting AM processes, International Journal of Production Research

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–310 of 310

Metadata

Authors
Kellens, K., Baumers, M., Gutowski, T. G., Flanagan, W., Lifset, R., & Duflou, J. R.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • General Electric (United States) (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Kellens, Karel
Venue
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Published
2017-08
Volume
21
Issue
S1
ISSN
  • 1088-1980 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-9290
OpenAlex
W2741018071
Cited by
310
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 7
FWCI
15.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Industrial Ecology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Wiley eBooks
Funders
GOA SUMMA
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Keywords
additive manufacturing, environmental impact, life cycle inventory, energy consumption, material consumption, waste and pollution, health and safety, feedstock production, supply chain, remanufacturing, lightweight design, conventional manufacturing comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review