Cited by 149

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Domestication and crop evolution of wheat and barley: Genes, genomics, and future directions

Haas, Matthew, Schreiber, Mona, Mascher, Martin·2019·Journal of Integrative Plant Biology

Abstract

Wheat and barley are two of the founder crops of the agricultural revolution that took place 10,000 years ago in the Fertile Crescent and both crops remain among the world's most important crops. Domestication of these crops from their wild ancestors required the evolution of traits useful to humans, rather than survival in their natural environment. Of these traits, grain retention and threshability, yield improvement, changes to photoperiod sensitivity and nutritional value are most pronounced between wild and domesticated forms. Knowledge about the geographical origins of these crops and the genes responsible for domestication traits largely pre‐dates the era of next‐generation sequencing, although sequencing will lead to new insights. Molecular markers were initially used to calculate distance (relatedness), genetic diversity and to generate genetic maps which were useful in cloning major domestication genes. Both crops are characterized by large, complex genomes which were long thought to be beyond the scope of whole‐genome sequencing. However, advances in sequencing technologies have improved the state of genomic resources for both wheat and barley. The availability of reference genomes for wheat and some of its progenitors, as well as for barley, sets the stage for answering unresolved questions in domestication genomics of wheat and barley.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jipb.12737

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Maize is an 11.4 M ya paleo-polyploid, allo-tetraploid switchgrass formed 4-6 M ya, and allo-hexaploid bread wheat arose about 8 k ya.

    “For example, maize is an 11.4 M ya paleo-polyploid (Gaut and Doebley, 1997), allo-tetraploid switchgrass formed 4–6 M ya (Lovell et al., 2021b), and allo-hexaploid bread wheat arose about 8 k ya (Haas et al., 2019).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 160

  1. 10.1080/07352689.2011.645428 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.12.002 · DOI
  3. Åberg E, 1938, Hordeum agriocrithon nova sp., a wild six‐rowed barley, Ann Agric Coll Sweden, 6, 159
  4. 10.1073/pnas.0803780105 · DOI
  5. 10.1098/rstb.2016.0429 · DOI
  6. 10.1073/pnas.1801071115 · DOI
  7. 10.1126/science.aan0032 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/aob/mcm129 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026330 · DOI
  10. 10.3389/fpls.2017.01792 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/s00122-007-0603-4 · DOI
  12. 10.1139/g98-136 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/s00122-003-1441-7 · DOI
  14. 10.1023/A:1011299021969 · DOI
  15. von Bothmer R, 1995, An Ecogeographical Study of The Genus Hordeum
  16. 10.1079/PGR200589 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/nature11650 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.tree.2008.09.008 · DOI
  19. 10.1073/pnas.0803981105 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/BF00290833 · DOI
  21. 10.1126/science.1259172 · DOI
  22. 10.1023/A:1008635208146 · DOI
  23. 10.2135/cropsci2001.4141021x · DOI
  24. 10.1111/nph.14377 · DOI
  25. 10.1371/journal.pone.0081955 · DOI
  26. 10.1101/gr.217117.116 · DOI
  27. 10.1186/1471-2164-10-582 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/ng.2447 · DOI
  29. 10.1073/pnas.1215265109 · DOI
  30. 10.1242/dev.146399 · DOI
  31. 10.1007/s11032-007-9153-3 · DOI
  32. 10.1105/tpc.17.00961 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.006 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/s001220050978 · DOI
  35. 10.1126/science.1143986 · DOI
  36. 10.1093/jhered/esr152 · DOI
  37. 10.1139/g93-004 · DOI
  38. 10.1126/science.1140097 · DOI
  39. 10.1093/genetics/164.1.311 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.gene.2014.03.034 · DOI
  41. 10.1073/pnas.1120496109 · DOI
  42. 10.1093/aob/mcm048 · DOI
  43. 10.1101/300848 · DOI
  44. 10.1111/pce.13138 · DOI
  45. 10.1007/s00122-018-3102-x · DOI
  46. 10.1007/s001220200004 · DOI
  47. 10.1126/science.153.3740.1074 · DOI
  48. Harris DR, 1989, Foraging and Farming: The Evolution of Plant Exploitation, 11
  49. 10.1093/jxb/ers162 · DOI
  50. 10.1139/G08-030 · DOI
  51. 10.1126/science.278.5341.1312 · DOI
  52. 10.1094/PDIS-06-17-0880-RE · DOI
  53. 10.1126/science.1251788 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1126/science.aar7191 · DOI
  55. 10.1093/gbe/evu047 · DOI
  56. 10.1038/nature12028 · DOI
  57. 10.1186/s13059-015-0606-4 · DOI
  58. 10.3389/fpls.2017.01798 · DOI
  59. 10.1023/A:1014859031781 · DOI
  60. 10.1007/s00438-006-0136-6 · DOI
  61. 10.1093/molbev/msm192 · DOI
  62. Kjack JL, 1974, Physiological activity of awns in isolines of Atlas Barley1, Crop Sci, 14, 243, 10.2135/cropsci1974.0011183X001400020003xb · DOI
  63. 10.1007/s00122-004-1710-0 · DOI
  64. 10.1073/pnas.0608580104 · DOI
  65. 10.1038/nbt.2280 · DOI
  66. 10.1007/s00122-007-0600-7 · DOI
  67. 10.1038/hdy.1978.87 · DOI
  68. 10.1007/s00122-016-2807-y · DOI
  69. 10.1038/nature11997 · DOI
  70. 10.1038/s41586-018-0108-0 · DOI
  71. 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.05.005 · DOI
  72. 10.1038/nature24486 · DOI
  73. 10.1007/s00122-006-0474-0 · DOI
  74. 10.1534/genetics.107.077297 · DOI
  75. 10.1126/science.1250092 · DOI
  76. 10.1139/g96-046 · DOI
  77. 10.1038/nature22043 · DOI · Paper page
  78. 10.1038/ng.3611 · DOI
  79. 10.1139/g03-080 · DOI
  80. 10.1186/s12864-015-1459-7 · DOI
  81. 10.1023/B:EUPH.0000047056.58938.76 · DOI
  82. Molina‐Cano JL, 1980, Hordeum spontaneum C. Koch em. Bacht, collected in southern Morocco, Barley Genet Newsl, 10, 44
  83. Mori N, 2003, Origins of domesticated emmer and common wheat inferred from chloroplast DNA fingerprinting, Tenth Int Wheat Genet Symp, 2003, 25
  84. 10.1073/pnas.0611377104 · DOI
  85. 10.1093/jhered/est083 · DOI
  86. 10.1038/374727a0 · DOI
  87. 10.1007/s00122-017-3010-5 · DOI
  88. 10.1093/genetics/48.4.469 · DOI
  89. 10.3389/fpls.2017.01840 · DOI
  90. 10.1007/s00122-008-0738-y · DOI
  91. 10.1111/pbr.12301 · DOI
  92. 10.1534/genetics.116.190736 · DOI
  93. 10.1093/genetics/154.2.931 · DOI
  94. 10.1007/s00122-007-0505-5 · DOI
  95. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.58.032806.104006 · DOI
  96. 10.1007/s00122-005-1925-8 · DOI
  97. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004002 · DOI
  98. 10.1007/s10722-010-9581-5 · DOI
  99. 10.1111/nph.15077 · DOI
  100. 10.1016/j.pbi.2016.12.001 · DOI
  101. 10.1126/science.269.5231.1714 · DOI
  102. 10.1146/annurev.pp.38.060187.001041 · DOI
  103. Peng J, 2011, Wild emmer wheat, Triticum dicoccoides, occupies a pivotal position in wheat domestication process, Aust J Crop Sci, 5, 1127
  104. 10.1038/nature02734 · DOI
  105. 10.1186/s13059-015-0712-3 · DOI
  106. 10.1016/j.pbi.2017.01.001 · DOI
  107. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.002 · DOI
  108. 10.1111/tpj.13876 · DOI
  109. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01093.x · DOI
  110. 10.1126/science.aar6089 · DOI
  111. 10.1038/ng.745 · DOI
  112. Ramsay L, 2000, A simple sequence repeat‐based linkage map of barley, Genetics, 156, 1997, 10.1093/genetics/156.4.1997 · DOI
  113. 10.1093/jxb/erw081 · DOI
  114. 10.1371/journal.pone.0062700 · DOI
  115. 10.1093/genetics/149.4.2007 · DOI
  116. 10.1371/journal.pone.0086021 · DOI
  117. 10.1038/ng.3612 · DOI
  118. 10.1093/pcp/pcr046 · DOI
  119. 10.1101/434985 · DOI
  120. 10.1038/nrg817 · DOI
  121. 10.1111/pbi.12837 · DOI
  122. Schmalenbach I, 2011, High‐resolution genotyping of wild barley introgression lines and fine‐mapping of the threshability locus thresh‐1 using the Illumina GoldenGate assay, G3‐Genes Genom Genet, 1, 187, 10.1534/g3.111.000182 · DOI
  123. 10.1094/PDIS-01-14-0062-RE · DOI
  124. 10.1534/genetics.105.044727 · DOI
  125. 10.1007/s00122-009-1043-0 · DOI
  126. 10.1146/annurev.es.17.110186.002303 · DOI
  127. 10.1046/j.1439-0523.2002.728336.x · DOI
  128. 10.1071/AR07123 · DOI
  129. 10.1038/s41588-018-0040-0 · DOI
  130. 10.1101/gr.109165.110 · DOI
  131. 10.1017/S001667230200575X · DOI
  132. 10.1073/pnas.0711034105 · DOI
  133. 10.1007/BF00223376 · DOI
  134. 10.1186/1471-2164-15-273 · DOI
  135. 10.1023/A:1019603201883 · DOI
  136. 10.1073/pnas.1635053100 · DOI
  137. 10.1126/science.1117619 · DOI
  138. 10.1126/science.1133649 · DOI
  139. 10.1007/s00122-007-0503-7 · DOI
  140. 10.1111/nph.12164 · DOI
  141. 10.1111/pbi.12183 · DOI
  142. 10.1034/j.1601-5223.2002.01609.x · DOI
  143. 10.1016/j.molp.2015.05.004 · DOI
  144. 10.1007/s00122-008-0898-9 · DOI
  145. 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2012.00713.x · DOI
  146. 10.1073/pnas.0937399100 · DOI
  147. 10.1126/science.1094305 · DOI
  148. 10.1073/pnas.0607142103 · DOI
  149. 10.1371/journal.pone.0176148 · DOI
  150. 10.1007/s00122-017-2882-8 · DOI
  151. 10.1534/genetics.107.074245 · DOI
  152. 10.1093/jxb/ers182 · DOI
  153. 10.1073/pnas.1113009109 · DOI
  154. 10.1073/pnas.1110552108 · DOI
  155. 10.1038/s41477-017-0067-8 · DOI
  156. 10.1038/s41588-018-0041-z · DOI
  157. 10.1093/gigascience/gix097 · DOI
  158. 10.1101/gr.213405.116 · DOI
  159. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1959.tb03012.x · DOI
  160. ZoharyD HopfM WeissE(2012) Domestication of Plants in the Old World: The origin and spread of domesticated plants in Southwest Asia Europe and the Mediterranean Basin. Oxford University Press on Demand Oxford United Kingdom · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Haas, M., Schreiber, M., & Mascher, M.
Affiliations
Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben Corrensstraße 3 06466 Seeland Germany
Venue
Journal of Integrative Plant Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-02-12
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
204-225
ISSN
  • 1672-9072
  • 1744-7909
Cited by
149
References
1
Language
en
Funders
German Research Foundation (MA6611/2)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review