The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Domestication and crop evolution of wheat and barley: Genes, genomics, and future directions
Abstract
Wheat and barley are two of the founder crops of the agricultural revolution that took place 10,000 years ago in the Fertile Crescent and both crops remain among the world's most important crops. Domestication of these crops from their wild ancestors required the evolution of traits useful to humans, rather than survival in their natural environment. Of these traits, grain retention and threshability, yield improvement, changes to photoperiod sensitivity and nutritional value are most pronounced between wild and domesticated forms. Knowledge about the geographical origins of these crops and the genes responsible for domestication traits largely pre‐dates the era of next‐generation sequencing, although sequencing will lead to new insights. Molecular markers were initially used to calculate distance (relatedness), genetic diversity and to generate genetic maps which were useful in cloning major domestication genes. Both crops are characterized by large, complex genomes which were long thought to be beyond the scope of whole‐genome sequencing. However, advances in sequencing technologies have improved the state of genomic resources for both wheat and barley. The availability of reference genomes for wheat and some of its progenitors, as well as for barley, sets the stage for answering unresolved questions in domestication genomics of wheat and barley.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Maize is an 11.4 M ya paleo-polyploid, allo-tetraploid switchgrass formed 4-6 M ya, and allo-hexaploid bread wheat arose about 8 k ya.
“For example, maize is an 11.4 M ya paleo-polyploid (Gaut and Doebley, 1997), allo-tetraploid switchgrass formed 4–6 M ya (Lovell et al., 2021b), and allo-hexaploid bread wheat arose about 8 k ya (Haas et al., 2019).”
From GENESPACE tracks regions of interest and gene copy number variation across multiple genomes (2022) · cites this paper as Haas et al., 2019
Citations
Cites
A physical, genetic and functional sequence assembly of the barley genome
The International Barley Genome Sequencing Consortium (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11543 · Cited by 1,456
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 160
- 10.1080/07352689.2011.645428 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.12.002 · DOI
- Åberg E, 1938, Hordeum agriocrithon nova sp., a wild six‐rowed barley, Ann Agric Coll Sweden, 6, 159
- 10.1073/pnas.0803780105 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2016.0429 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1801071115 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aan0032 · DOI
- 10.1093/aob/mcm129 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026330 · DOI
- 10.3389/fpls.2017.01792 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00122-007-0603-4 · DOI
- 10.1139/g98-136 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00122-003-1441-7 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1011299021969 · DOI
- von Bothmer R, 1995, An Ecogeographical Study of The Genus Hordeum
- 10.1079/PGR200589 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature11650 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tree.2008.09.008 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0803981105 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00290833 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1259172 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1008635208146 · DOI
- 10.2135/cropsci2001.4141021x · DOI
- 10.1111/nph.14377 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0081955 · DOI
- 10.1101/gr.217117.116 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2164-10-582 · DOI
- 10.1038/ng.2447 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1215265109 · DOI
- 10.1242/dev.146399 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11032-007-9153-3 · DOI
- 10.1105/tpc.17.00961 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.006 · DOI
- 10.1007/s001220050978 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1143986 · DOI
- 10.1093/jhered/esr152 · DOI
- 10.1139/g93-004 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1140097 · DOI
- 10.1093/genetics/164.1.311 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gene.2014.03.034 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1120496109 · DOI
- 10.1093/aob/mcm048 · DOI
- 10.1101/300848 · DOI
- 10.1111/pce.13138 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00122-018-3102-x · DOI
- 10.1007/s001220200004 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.153.3740.1074 · DOI
- Harris DR, 1989, Foraging and Farming: The Evolution of Plant Exploitation, 11
- 10.1093/jxb/ers162 · DOI
- 10.1139/G08-030 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.278.5341.1312 · DOI
- 10.1094/PDIS-06-17-0880-RE · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1251788 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.aar7191 · DOI
- 10.1093/gbe/evu047 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature12028 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13059-015-0606-4 · DOI
- 10.3389/fpls.2017.01798 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1014859031781 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00438-006-0136-6 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msm192 · DOI
- Kjack JL, 1974, Physiological activity of awns in isolines of Atlas Barley1, Crop Sci, 14, 243, 10.2135/cropsci1974.0011183X001400020003xb · DOI
- 10.1007/s00122-004-1710-0 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0608580104 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.2280 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00122-007-0600-7 · DOI
- 10.1038/hdy.1978.87 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00122-016-2807-y · DOI
- 10.1038/nature11997 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-018-0108-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.05.005 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature24486 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00122-006-0474-0 · DOI
- 10.1534/genetics.107.077297 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1250092 · DOI
- 10.1139/g96-046 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature22043 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ng.3611 · DOI
- 10.1139/g03-080 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12864-015-1459-7 · DOI
- 10.1023/B:EUPH.0000047056.58938.76 · DOI
- Molina‐Cano JL, 1980, Hordeum spontaneum C. Koch em. Bacht, collected in southern Morocco, Barley Genet Newsl, 10, 44
- Mori N, 2003, Origins of domesticated emmer and common wheat inferred from chloroplast DNA fingerprinting, Tenth Int Wheat Genet Symp, 2003, 25
- 10.1073/pnas.0611377104 · DOI
- 10.1093/jhered/est083 · DOI
- 10.1038/374727a0 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00122-017-3010-5 · DOI
- 10.1093/genetics/48.4.469 · DOI
- 10.3389/fpls.2017.01840 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00122-008-0738-y · DOI
- 10.1111/pbr.12301 · DOI
- 10.1534/genetics.116.190736 · DOI
- 10.1093/genetics/154.2.931 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00122-007-0505-5 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.arplant.58.032806.104006 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00122-005-1925-8 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004002 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10722-010-9581-5 · DOI
- 10.1111/nph.15077 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pbi.2016.12.001 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.269.5231.1714 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.pp.38.060187.001041 · DOI
- Peng J, 2011, Wild emmer wheat, Triticum dicoccoides, occupies a pivotal position in wheat domestication process, Aust J Crop Sci, 5, 1127
- 10.1038/nature02734 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13059-015-0712-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pbi.2017.01.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.002 · DOI
- 10.1111/tpj.13876 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01093.x · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aar6089 · DOI
- 10.1038/ng.745 · DOI
- Ramsay L, 2000, A simple sequence repeat‐based linkage map of barley, Genetics, 156, 1997, 10.1093/genetics/156.4.1997 · DOI
- 10.1093/jxb/erw081 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0062700 · DOI
- 10.1093/genetics/149.4.2007 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0086021 · DOI
- 10.1038/ng.3612 · DOI
- 10.1093/pcp/pcr046 · DOI
- 10.1101/434985 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrg817 · DOI
- 10.1111/pbi.12837 · DOI
- Schmalenbach I, 2011, High‐resolution genotyping of wild barley introgression lines and fine‐mapping of the threshability locus thresh‐1 using the Illumina GoldenGate assay, G3‐Genes Genom Genet, 1, 187, 10.1534/g3.111.000182 · DOI
- 10.1094/PDIS-01-14-0062-RE · DOI
- 10.1534/genetics.105.044727 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00122-009-1043-0 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.es.17.110186.002303 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1439-0523.2002.728336.x · DOI
- 10.1071/AR07123 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41588-018-0040-0 · DOI
- 10.1101/gr.109165.110 · DOI
- 10.1017/S001667230200575X · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0711034105 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00223376 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2164-15-273 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1019603201883 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1635053100 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1117619 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1133649 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00122-007-0503-7 · DOI
- 10.1111/nph.12164 · DOI
- 10.1111/pbi.12183 · DOI
- 10.1034/j.1601-5223.2002.01609.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molp.2015.05.004 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00122-008-0898-9 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2012.00713.x · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0937399100 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1094305 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0607142103 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0176148 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00122-017-2882-8 · DOI
- 10.1534/genetics.107.074245 · DOI
- 10.1093/jxb/ers182 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1113009109 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1110552108 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41477-017-0067-8 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41588-018-0041-z · DOI
- 10.1093/gigascience/gix097 · DOI
- 10.1101/gr.213405.116 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1959.tb03012.x · DOI
- ZoharyD HopfM WeissE(2012) Domestication of Plants in the Old World: The origin and spread of domesticated plants in Southwest Asia Europe and the Mediterranean Basin. Oxford University Press on Demand Oxford United Kingdom · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
GENESPACE tracks regions of interest and gene copy number variation across multiple genomes
Lovell, J. T., Sreedasyam, A., Schranz, M. E., Wilson, M., Carlson, J. W., Harkess, A., Emms, D., Goodstein, D. M., & Schmutz, J. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.78526 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Haas, M., Schreiber, M., & Mascher, M.
- Affiliations
- Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben Corrensstraße 3 06466 Seeland Germany
- Venue
- Journal of Integrative Plant Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-02-12
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 204-225
- ISSN
- 1672-9072
- 1744-7909
- Cited by
- 149
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Funders
- German Research Foundation (MA6611/2)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review