Cited by 41CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA regulation and diseaseTransgenic Plants and Applications

PE6c greatly enhances prime editing in transgenic rice plants

Open access
Cao, Zhenghong, Sun, Wei, Qiao, Dexin, Wang, Junya, Li, Siyun, Liu, Xiaohan, Xin, Cuiping, Lu, Yu +3 more·2024·Journal of Integrative Plant Biology

Abstract

Prime editing is a versatile CRISPR/Cas-based precise genome-editing technique for crop breeding. Four new types of prime editors (PEs) named PE6a-d were recently generated using evolved and engineered reverse transcriptase (RT) variants from three different sources. In this study, we tested the editing efficiencies of four PE6 variants and two additional PE6 constructs with double-RT modules in transgenic rice (Oryza sativa) plants. PE6c, with an evolved and engineered RT variant from the yeast Tf1 retrotransposon, yielded the highest prime-editing efficiency. The average fold change in the editing efficiency of PE6c compared with PEmax exceeded 3.5 across 18 agronomically important target sites from 15 genes. We also demonstrated the feasibility of using two RT modules to improve prime-editing efficiency. Our results suggest that PE6c or its derivatives would be an excellent choice for prime editing in monocot plants. In addition, our findings have laid a foundation for prime-editing-based breeding of rice varieties with enhanced agronomically important traits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jipb.13738

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies have demonstrated a significant increase in PE efficiency, with variants like PE6c achieving over threefold increases in editing efficiency in rice.

    “Recent studies have demonstrated a significant increase in PE efficiency, with variants like PE6c achieving over threefold increases in editing efficiency in rice (Cao et al., 2024).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cao, Z., Sun, W., Qiao, D., Wang, J., Li, S., Liu, X., Xin, C., Lu, Y., Gul, S. L., Wang, X., & Chen, Q.
Affiliations
  • China Agricultural University (CN)
  • State Key Laboratory of Plant Environmental Resilience, College of Biological Sciences China Agricultural University Beijing 100193 China
Venue
Journal of Integrative Plant Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-07-09
Volume
66
Issue
9
Pages
1864-1870
ISSN
  • 0577-7496 (ISSN-L)
  • 1672-9072
  • 1744-7909
OpenAlex
W4400447375
Cited by
41
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 2
FWCI
5.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Integrative Plant Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFD1202905)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Transgenic Plants and Applications
Keywords
prime editing, CRISPR/Cas genome editing, transgenic rice, rice, editing efficiency, crop breeding
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, Oryza, Plants, Genetically Modified, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review