Fine motor and self‐care milestones for individuals with D own syndrome using a R etrospective C hart R eview
Abstract
Background: Developmental milestone markers for fine motor and self‐care skills among children with Down syndrome (DS) are either minimal, anecdotal or out‐of date. Our goal was to produce normative expectations for the development of fine motor and self‐care milestones specific to children with DS. Method: A cross‐sectional retrospective chart review was completed on 274 children with DS seen at a specialty clinic that ranged in age from 4 months to 18 years. Specific skills were assessed at occupational therapy assessments as either present or absent, including fine motor, handwriting, scissor usage, self‐feeding and clothing management. Results: Fine motor milestones describing when 10–30% (‘early achievers’) and 75–95% (‘representative achievement’) of children with DS had mastered each skill were developed based upon descriptive review. As the fine motor and self‐care skills advanced in complexity, the range of ages for documented skill acquisition was observed to increase. Conclusions: Age ranges for the mastery of fine motor developmental milestones for early and representative achievement were developed based upon descriptive analysis of cross‐sectional retrospective clinical chart reviews. That the age range for mastering fine motor and self‐care skills broadens as children with DS get older is in agreement with what is identified in the DS behavioural phenotype with regard to variable motor skills overall. These fine motor and self‐care developmental milestone markers contribute to the field by informing parents, caregivers and healthcare providers of potential fine motor and self‐care outcomes and describing normative development for children with DS.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The early developmental onset of network-level disruptions in DS coincides with the emergence of intellectual disability.
“The early developmental onset of these network-level disruptions — which are probably the product of altered synapse formation and function — coincides with the emergence of intellectual disability, suggesting that the cognitive deficits may be the product of impaired network-level function37,140–142.”
From Consequences of trisomy 21 for brain development in Down syndrome (2024) · cites this paper as [140]
Cognitive deficits in DS may be the product of impaired network-level function.
“The early developmental onset of these network-level disruptions — which are probably the product of altered synapse formation and function — coincides with the emergence of intellectual disability, suggesting that the cognitive deficits may be the product of impaired network-level function37,140–142.”
From Consequences of trisomy 21 for brain development in Down syndrome (2024) · cites this paper as [140]
Cites
DiGuiseppi, C., Hepburn, S., Davis, J. M., Fidler, D. J., Hartway, S., Lee, N. R., Miller, L., Ruttenber, M., & Robinson, C. (2010) · Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics · doi:10.1097/dbp.0b013e3181d5aa6d · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Outcome Measures for Clinical Trials in Down Syndrome
Esbensen, A. J., Hooper, S. R., Fidler, D., Hartley, S. L., Edgin, J., d'Ardhuy, X. L., Capone, G., Conners, F. A., Mervis, C. B., Abbeduto, L., et al. (2017) · American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1352/1944-7558-122.3.247 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Self-citationJain, P. D., Nayak, A., Karnad, S. D., & Doctor, K. N. (2022) · Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics · doi:10.3345/cep.2021.00479 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Consequences of trisomy 21 for brain development in Down syndrome
Russo, M. L., Sousa, A. M. M., & Bhattacharyya, A. (2024) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-024-00866-2 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“…developmental onset of these network-level disruptions — which are probably the product of altered synapse formation and function — coincides with the emergence of intellectual disability, suggesting that the cognitive deficits may be the product of impaired network-level function 37,140–142 .”
- Authors
- Frank, K., & Esbensen, A. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Frank, K.
- ORCID
- Esbensen, A. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-12-23
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 719-729
- ISSN
- 0964-2633 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2788
- OpenAlex
- W1541681968
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 1.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Intellectual Disability Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Keywords
- Down syndrome, fine motor skills, self-care ability, developmental milestones, normative development, children, handwriting, self-feeding, clothing management, motor development
- MeSH terms
- Achievement, Adolescent, Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Down Syndrome, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Motor Skills, Retrospective Studies, Self Care, Caregivers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review