Cited by 67Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchChildren's Physical and Motor DevelopmentCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders

Gross motor dysfunction and balance impairments in children and adolescents with Down syndrome: a systematic review

Open access
Jain, Preyal D., Nayak, Akshatha, Karnad, Shreekanth D., Doctor, Kaiorisa N.·2022·Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics

Abstract

Background: Individuals with Down syndrome present with several impairments such as hypotonia, ligament laxity, decreased muscle strength, insufficient muscular cocontraction, inadequate postural control, and disturbed proprioception. These factors are responsible for the developmental challenges faced by children with Down syndrome. These individuals also present with balance dysfunctions.Purpose: This systematic review aims to describe the motor dysfunction and balance impairments in children and adolescents with Down syndrome.Methods: We searched the Scopus, ScienceDirect, MEDLINE, Wiley, and EBSCO databases for observational studies evaluating the motor abilities and balance performance in individuals with Down syndrome. The review was registered on PROSPERO.Results: A total of 1,096 articles were retrieved; after careful screening and scrutinizing against the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 10 articles were included in the review. Overall, the children and adolescents with Down syndrome showed delays and dysfunction in performing various activities such as sitting, pulling to stand, standing, and walking. They also presented with compensatory mechanisms to maintain their equilibrium in static and dynamic activities.Conclusion: The motor development of children with Down syndrome is significantly delayed due to structural differences in the brain. These individuals have inefficient compensatory strategies like increasing step width, increasing frequency of mediolateral center of pressure displacement, decreasing anteroposterior displacement, increasing trunk stiffness, and increasing posterior trunk displacement to maintain equilibrium. Down syndrome presents with interindividual variations; therefore, a thorough evaluation is required before a structured intervention is developed to improve motor and balance dysfunction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3345/cep.2021.00479

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The DS neurodevelopmental phenotype encompasses deficits in executive function, working memory, motor coordination, and linguistic processing that emerge within the first postnatal months and influence academic, occupational, and adaptive functioning trajectories throughout the lifespan.

    “This neurodevelopmental phenotype encompasses deficits in executive function, working memory, motor coordination, and linguistic processing - impairments that emerge within the first postnatal months and profoundly influence academic, occupational, and adaptive functioning trajectories throughout the lifespan (2-5).”

    From Molecular and cellular processes disrupted in the early postnatal Down syndrome prefrontal cortex (2026) · cites this paper as [3]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [5]Frank K Esbensen AJ Fine motor and self-care milestones for individuals with Down syndrome using a retrospective chart review J Intellect Disabil Res 2015 59 719 29 25533735
  2. [17]Vimercati SL Galli M Stella G Caiazzo G Ancillao A Albertini G Clumsiness in fine motor tasks: evidence from the quantitative drawing evaluation of children with Down Syndrome J Intellect Disabil Res 2015 59 248 56 24773480

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jain, P. D., Nayak, A., Karnad, S. D., & Doctor, K. N.
Affiliations
Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN)
Corresponding author
Nayak, Akshatha
Venue
Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics
Published
2022-03-15
Volume
65
Issue
3
Pages
142-149
ISSN
  • 1738-1061 (ISSN-L)
  • 2713-4148
OpenAlex
W3166272673
Cited by
66
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Korean Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Keywords
Down syndrome, balance disorders, motor delay, hypotonia, ligamentous laxity, postural control, compensatory strategies, children and adolescents, center of pressure displacement, trunk stiffness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review