The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feasibility study of a parent‐driven intervention for youth with Down syndrome
Open accessAbstract
Background: Children with Down syndrome present with behavioural and emotional difficulties, including noncompliance, rule‐breaking, emotion dysregulation and delays in executive functioning. Few behavioural interventions have been designed specifically for children with Down syndrome. The Research Units in Behavioral Intervention (RUBI) Parent Training for Disruptive Behaviors is a structured empirically supported parent training programme developed for caregivers of children with autism. This feasibility trial explored the feasibility and acceptability of an abbreviated RUBI intervention with caregivers of children with Down syndrome and identified promising outcome measures to target in future larger clinical trials. Method: A double‐blind randomised feasibility pilot clinical trial allocated participants to a behavioural intervention (BEH) or educational (EDU) group. BEH and EDU consisted of five individual sessions over the course of 5 to 8 weeks. Measures were administered to 20 caregivers and their youth with Down syndrome at three time points. Results: Both BEH and EDU were rated as feasible with high parental adherence and acceptable with high treatment satisfaction. Both BEH and EDU demonstrated decreased externalising behaviours, irritability and hyperactivity and improved behavioural regulation in executive functioning over time. No impact was noted on caregiver functioning. Conclusion: The feasibility trial has strong findings regarding feasibility and satisfaction and has promising findings regarding the selection of measures for future trials testing an adapted RUBI programme and an education programme to reduce behavioural challenges in children with Down syndrome. Larger scale clinical trials are needed to confirm promising findings of these feasible treatments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Parent training, namely targeted skill development for caregivers in addressing maladaptive behavior, has shown potential to reduce irritability.
“Parent training, namely targeted skill development for caregivers in addressing maladaptive behavior, has shown potential to reduce irritability [129–131].”
From Pharmacological treatment in autism: a proposal for guidelines on common co-occurring psychiatric symptoms (2025) · cites this paper as [131]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
TEST REVIEW behavior rating inventory of executive function.
Gioia, G. A., Isquith, P. K., Guy, S. C., & Kenworthy, L. (2000) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1076/chin.6.3.235.3152 · Cited by 1,925
Eldridge, S. M., Lancaster, G. A., Campbell, M. J., Thabane, L., Hopewell, S., Coleman, C. L., & Bond, C. M. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150205 · Cited by 1,581
Baker, B. L., McIntyre, L. L., Blacher, J., Crnic, K., Edelbrock, C., & Low, C. (2003) · Journal of Intellectual Disability Research · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2788.2003.00484.x · Cited by 930
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- Achenbach T. M., 2001, ASEBA School‐Age Forms & Profiles
- Aman M. G., 1985, The aberrant behavior checklist: a behavior rating scale for the assessment of treatment effects, American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 89, 485
- Aman M. G., 1985, Psychometric characteristics of the aberrant behavior checklist, American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 89, 492
- 10.1352/0895-8017(2002)107<0433:BPAPSI>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Bearss K., 2018, Parent training for disruptive behavior: The RUBI autism network, clinician manual
- Bruininks R. H., 1996, SIB‐R: Scales of Independent Behavior‐Revised
- 10.1542/peds.2011-1605 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10803-020-04427-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ajmg.c.30097 · DOI
- Chow S. C., 2008, Design and Analysis of Clinical Trials: Concepts and Methodologies
- 10.4324/9780203771587 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1352/1944-7558-114.4.254-268 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajmg.a.37001 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00911315 · DOI
- 10.1352/0895-8017(1997)102<0228:MBICWP>2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/s11689-015-9101-1 · DOI
- 10.1111/jir.12496 · DOI
- 10.1352/1944-7558-127.2.149 · DOI
- 10.1352/1944-7558-126.4.307 · DOI
- 10.3104/perspectives.316 · DOI
- 10.3104/case-studies.2008 · DOI
- Gioia G. A., 2000, Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function: BRIEF
- 10.1002/bin.237 · DOI
- Kaufman A. S., 2004, Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test–Second Edition (KBIT‐2)
- 10.1111/famp.12550 · DOI
- McGuire D., 2006, Mental wellness in adults with Down syndrome
- 10.1016/S0005-7894(83)80111-7 · DOI
- 10.1352/1944-7558-117.1.48 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1352/1944-7558-126.2.114 · DOI
- 10.1080/19315864.2018.1481473 · DOI
- 10.31234/osf.io/bh6tk · DOI
- 10.1007/s11920-007-0083-x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Manter, M. A., Birtwell, K. B., Bath, J., Friedman, N. D. B., Keary, C. J., Neumeyer, A. M., Palumbo, M. L., Thom, R. P., Stonestreet, E., Brooks, H., et al. (2025) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-024-03814-0 · Cited by 51
“Parent training, namely targeted skill development for caregivers in addressing maladaptive behavior, has shown potential to reduce irritability [129–131].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Stone‐Heaberlin, M., Blackburn, A., Hoffman, E. K., & Esbensen, A. J.
- Affiliations
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Esbensen, A. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2024-07-09
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1077-1086
- ISSN
- 0964-2633 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2788
- PMC
- PMC13170449
- OpenAlex
- W4400460980
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7
- FWCI
- 4.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Intellectual Disability Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Fondation Jérôme Lejeune
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R21HD082307)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
- Keywords
- Down syndrome, parent training, behavioral interventions, feasibility, acceptability, externalizing problems, irritability, hyperactivity, executive function, emotion regulation, children with intellectual disabilities, caregiver education
- MeSH terms
- Problem Behavior, Adolescent, Adult, Behavior Therapy, Child, Double-Blind Method, Down Syndrome, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Parents, Pilot Projects, Caregivers, Outcome Assessment, Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review