Cited by 11Latin American socio-political dynamicsLatin American Urban StudiesUrban Development and Societal Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 11 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Housing Movements and the Politics of Worthiness in São Paulo

Open access
Kopper, Moisés, Richmond, Matthew A.·2021·The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology

Abstract

Based on research with current and former housing activists in São Paulo, this article identifies the concept of “politics of worthiness” as central to the moral justification and technical legitimation of social movements. Attributions of worthiness have long upheld the relationship between institutionalized grassroots organizations and the state but are equally present in everyday life and social distinctions among Brazil's popular classes. By examining contrasting constructions of worthiness among both present-day housing movements and residents of areas that are the product of past mobilizations, the article contends that collective experiences of mobilization in dialogue with myriad external influences produce diverse and often ambivalent political subjectivities. The politics of worthiness sheds light on how these actors organize themselves, experience participation, and square universalist demands with the contingent solidarities and changing social, institutional, and political realities that they inhabit.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The article argues that a “politics of worthiness”—the moral justification and technical legitimation of claims—is central to how housing movements and residents in São Paulo’s periphery organize, participate, and draw boundaries among the poor. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork in Fazenda da Juta and MTSTL1, it shows how worthiness is constructed through movement bureaucracies and everyday moral frameworks, producing ambivalent political subjectivities.

Key findings

  • Former mutirão residents in Fazenda da Juta distinguish themselves from residents of newer “invasions,” framing the latter as disorganized, depoliticized, and thus less legitimate, even though most mutirão residents also earn less than two minimum wages (IBGE 2010) and recall their own neighborhood’s past stigma.
  • Within MTSTL1, a rating score system ranks participation: occupations yield 15 points, marches 10, static demonstrations 5, and group meetings or membership-fee payment only 1 point; this system becomes an anxious “technomoral index of self-worth” and a site of competition, including a “point laundering” scheme uncovered by a coordinator.
  • The movement’s bureaucratic infrastructures produce a distinction between “activist” and “dissident” workers: dissident members like Elaine attend meetings but refuse demonstrations during work hours, treating housing as a pragmatic familial project rather than a partisan political commitment.
  • Worthiness is modulated by multiple socializing influences—movement, church, work, popular culture—so the same actors can draw on technomoral or more diffuse moral frameworks depending on context; the emic concept of “struggle” (luta) anchors competing understandings of worthiness.

Methods

  • Postdoctoral ethnographic fieldwork in Fazenda da Juta, Sapopemba, São Paulo East Zone, conducted 2016–2017. Matthew Richmond did 18 months of fieldwork, including over 50 interviews with residents and local institutions, ethnographic observation, 8 interviews with former mutirão participants, and 6 with current mutirão residents (children of mutirantes). Moisés Kopper did 10 months among MTSTL1 leaders and members, with participant observation from recruitment to construction of a new mutirão.
  • The two projects overlapped and included direct collaboration; analysis is qualitative and case-based, focusing on mutirão residents’ constructions of worthiness and MTSTL1’s bureaucratic participation architectures, including origin groups, enrollment, and rating scores.

Limitations

  • The paper states that there was “no space to address the views of the residents of the occupations themselves,” though five were interviewed and their actions did not appear to be a deliberate objective of any.
  • Evident from the text: the study is a qualitative, neighborhood- and movement-specific ethnography, so findings are not presented as statistically generalizable; it focuses mainly on MTSTL1 and Fazenda da Juta, with limited attention to other housing movements or occupation residents’ perspectives.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jlca.12533

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

1 of 11 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 19
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 17
31 of 31

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Conflicting frequency of origin-group meetings

    Minor

    The paper says origin groups convene twice a month, but later says their coordinators meet weekly with the groups' constituencies. These descriptions give different frequencies for the same meetings.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 23 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Aquino Carlos Filadelfo, 2008, A Coletivização como Processo de Construção de um Movimento de Moradia: Uma Etnografia do Movimento Sem‐Teto do Centro (MSTC)
  2. Aquino Carlos Filadelfo, 2015, A Luta está no Sangue: Família, Política e Movimentos de Moradia em São Paulo
  3. Brum Mario., 2012, Cidade Alta: História, Memórias e Estigma de Favela num Conjunto Habitacional do Rio de Janeiro
  4. Damo Arlei S., 2006, Etnografias da Participação, 136
  5. Feltran Gabriel De Santis, 2011, Fronteiras de Tensão: Política e Violência nas Periferias de São Paulo
  6. Ferreira Deocleciana., 2018, Fazenda da Juta/SP: Uma Trilha entre o Rural e o Urbano—Trajetória de Luta e Resistência no Assentamento de um Povo
  7. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE), 2010, Censo Demográfico
  8. Souza Jessé., 2012, Os Batalhadores Brasileiros: Nova Classe Média ou Nova Classe Trabalhadora?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 11

Metadata

Authors
Kopper, M., & Richmond, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Corresponding author
Richmond, Matthew A.
Venue
The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-03-11
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
276-296
ISSN
  • 1085-7052 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-4932
  • 1935-4940
OpenAlex
W3138769496
Cited by
9
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
Funders
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2015/)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Latin American socio-political dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Latin American Urban Studies
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Development and Societal Issues
Keywords
housing movement, social movements, grassroots organizations, political subjectivity, social distinction, popular classes, urban housing, São Paulo, collective mobilization, political participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review