CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,258

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Dignity of Working Men

Lamont, Michèle·2000
DOI 10.4159/9780674039889
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Lamont takes us into the world inhabited by working-class men—the world as they understand it. Interviewing French and American working-class men who, because they are not college graduates, have limited access to high-paying jobs and other social benefits, she constructs a revealing portrait of how they see themselves and the rest of society.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4159/9780674039889

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The drawing of boundaries between moral in-groups and out-groups is always culturally and historically situated, as subjects repurpose moral frameworks and mobilize the symbolic resources available to them.

    “the drawing of boundaries between moral in-groups and out-groups is always culturally and historically situated, as subjects repurpose moral frameworks and mobilize the symbolic resources available to them (Lamont 2000).”

    From Housing Movements and the Politics of Worthiness in São Paulo (2021) · cites this paper as Lamont 2000

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lamont, M.
Publisher
Harvard University Press
Published
2000-12-31
DOI
10.4159/9780674039889
Cited by
1,258
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review