Cited by 16

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Polymetamorphism during the Grenvillian Orogeny in SE Ontario: Results from trace element mapping, in situ geochronology, and diffusion geospeedometry

Gaidies, F., Mccarron, T., Simpson, A. D., Easton, R. M., Glorie, S., Putlitz, B., Trebus, K.·2024·Journal of Metamorphic Geology

Abstract

The Flinton Group is a metasedimentary succession of the Grenville Province in SE Ontario, potentially allowing insight into the tectono‐thermal evolution of continental crust during the Mesoproterozoic. At its Green Bay locality, Flinton Group metapelites of the staurolite zone contain abundant, post‐kinematic garnet porphyroblasts. Whereas the larger garnet crystals are typically impinged, smaller crystals are isolated from each other, occasionally exhibiting elongated shapes with apparently trigonal morphology. Central sections of the garnet population of a representative sample reveal that garnet is composed of different compositional and microstructural domains. In the largest crystals of the population, garnet contains rectangular to rhombic domains, marked by sharp increases in the concentrations of Nb, V, Ti, and Cr. These domains are associated with irregularly shaped patches, characterized by spatially heterogenous enrichments of Ca and LREE, and depletions in the contents of P, Y, MREE, and HREE, accompanied by increased densities of comparatively coarse‐grained quartz inclusions hosting apatite. Microstructural relationships indicate that these domains correspond to portions of garnet that pseudomorphed biotite, with the enrichments of Nb, V, Ti, and Cr outlining the original biotite shapes. The compositional patterns formed by Ca, P, Y, and REE indicate that apatite participated in the grain‐fluid interactions that operated during the metasomatic replacement of biotite by garnet. The statistical analyses of the garnet number and size distributions confirm that garnet initially nucleated on biotite, controlled by the kinetics of attachment and detachment processes at the garnet/biotite interface, resulting in the typical impingement habit. In situ Lu–Hf garnet geochronology applied to garnet that did not pseudomorph biotite, and hence is enriched in HREE, points to a first metamorphic event at c. 1080 31 Ma. Subsequent pseudomorphism of staurolite by white mica in a Al 2 O 3 ‐ and FeO‐mobile system resulted in the concomitant crystallization of a new garnet generation, forming overgrowths on the first garnet generation and nuclei in the fine‐grained matrix. Garnet that nucleated during this event grew to isolated and elongated crystals with apparently trigonal morphology, aligned in a direction c. perpendicular to the rock matrix foliation. The open‐system behaviour during this event limits the use of whole‐rock‐based geochronological and thermobarometrical applications. However, previously published in situ U–Pb ages of monazite included in the rims of the garnet crystals and in the rock matrix indicate that this event took place at c. 976 4 Ma, likely associated with a period of increased hydrothermal activity late in the metamorphic history of the Grenvillian Orogeny. Diffusion geospeedometry calculations indicate that garnet growth during this hydrothermal event lasted for less than 6 Myr.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jmg.12745

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent data from the Flinton group (Mazinaw domain) are consistent with early garnet growth at 1080 ±31 Ma (Lu-Hf garnet) overgrown by ca.975 Ma (Rigolet-age) rims (U-Pb, monazite included in garnet rims).

    “For instance, recent data from the Flinton group (Mazinaw domain, Fig. 3) are consistent with early garnet growth at 1080 ±31 Ma (Lu-Hf garnet) overgrown by ca.975 Ma (Rigolet-age) rims (U-Pb, monazite included in garnet rims) (Gaidies et al. 2023;McCarron et al. 2014);”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 118

  1. 10.2475/ajs.294.9.1061 · DOI
  2. 10.2113/gselements.9.6.439 · DOI
  3. 10.1093/petrology/egaa055 · DOI
  4. 10.1029/95TC03501 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1007/BF00371361 · DOI
  6. 10.1180/minmag.1991.055.380.03 · DOI
  7. 10.2138/am.2006.2043 · DOI
  8. 10.1080/00206814.2010.496184 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/gj.3350300303 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/BF00377479 · DOI
  11. 10.1144/0016-76492006-115 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/j.1525-1314.1994.tb00048.x · DOI
  13. 10.1038/s41598-019-51214-9 · DOI
  14. 10.1007/BF00296579 · DOI
  15. 10.1046/j.1525-1314.2002.00395.x · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1525-1314.1993.tb00155.x · DOI
  17. 10.1139/e95-081 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/BF00310739 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1017/S0305004100023197 · DOI
  20. 10.1130/0091-7613(1998)026<0503:TDPOGN>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  21. 10.1046/j.1525-1314.1999.00200.x · DOI
  22. 10.4095/205286 · DOI
  23. 10.2138/am.2010.3354 · DOI
  24. 10.1111/j.1525-1314.1997.00007.x · DOI
  25. Easton R. M., 1992, The Grenville Province and the Proterozoic history of central and southern Ontario. Vol. Special Volume 4, Part 2, Ontario Geological Survey, book section, 19, 713
  26. Easton R. M., 2001, Precambrian Geology, Mazinaw Lake Area. Map, 1:50000 Ministry of Energy
  27. Easton R. M., 2006, Precambrian Geology, Cloyne‐Plevna‐Ompah Area. Map, 1:50000 Ministry of Energy
  28. 10.1111/j.1525-1314.2004.00532.x · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.lithos.2019.03.002 · DOI
  30. 10.1093/petrology/egac118 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/jmg.12680 · DOI
  32. 10.1180/minmag.2010.074.1.111 · DOI
  33. 10.1007/BF00310683 · DOI
  34. Ford F. D.(2002).Progressive metamorphism of Flinton Group pelitic schists Grenville Province Southeastern Ontario Carleton University Phd thesis.
  35. 10.1130/G50542.1 · DOI
  36. 10.1111/j.1525-1314.2006.00648.x · DOI
  37. 10.1007/s00410-007-0263-z · DOI
  38. 10.1130/G48715.1 · DOI
  39. 10.1111/jmg.12648 · DOI
  40. Gaidies F., 2017, Metamorphic mineral reactions: Porphyroblast, corona and symplectite growth, EMU Notes in Mineralogy, 16, 469
  41. 10.1111/jmg.12562 · DOI
  42. 10.1007/s00410-011-0635-2 · DOI
  43. 10.1111/jmg.12108 · DOI
  44. 10.1007/s00410-017-1372-y · DOI
  45. 10.1111/jmg.12539 · DOI
  46. 10.1007/s00410-018-1503-0 · DOI
  47. 10.2113/gselements.11.3.171 · DOI
  48. 10.2138/am.2005.1498 · DOI
  49. 10.1130/0091-7613(1987)15<573:TZIAMG>2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1130/GES00631.1 · DOI
  51. Hirsch D. M., 2000, An evaluation of spatial correlation functions in textural analysis of metamorphic rocks, Geological Materials Research, 2, 1
  52. 10.1111/j.1525-1314.1998.00140.x · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1007/s00410-003-0464-z · DOI
  54. 10.1126/science.154.3757.1647 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1039/b804760j · DOI
  56. Jackson S. E., 2008, Calibration strategies for elemental analysis by LA‐ICP‐MS, Mineralogical Association of Canada Short Course Series, 40, 169
  57. 10.1144/gsjgs.122.1.0029 · DOI
  58. 10.1111/jmg.12053 · DOI
  59. 10.1130/GES00001.1 · DOI
  60. 10.1111/j.1525-1314.2012.00978.x · DOI
  61. 10.1127/0935-1221/2007/0019-1749 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/0024-4937(74)90025-5 · DOI
  63. 10.1111/j.1525-1314.1993.tb00134.x · DOI
  64. 10.1111/j.1525-1314.2006.00647.x · DOI
  65. 10.1180/mgm.2021.55 · DOI
  66. 10.1093/petrology/egab077 · DOI
  67. Lane K. M.(2011).Metamorphic and geochronological constraints on the evolution of the Kalinjala Shear Zone Eyre Peninsula. (Hons thesis) University of Adelaide Adelaide.
  68. 10.1016/0016-7037(95)00320-Y · DOI
  69. 10.1016/0016-7037(79)90158-3 · DOI
  70. 10.2113/econgeo.110.6.1425 · DOI
  71. Lawley C. J. M., 2020, Precious metal mobility during serpentinization and breakdown of base metal sulphide, Lithos, 105278, 354
  72. 10.1111/j.1525-1314.1986.tb00347.x · DOI
  73. 10.1007/BF00373040 · DOI
  74. 10.1111/j.1468-8123.2007.00179.x · DOI
  75. 10.1093/petrology/egp050 · DOI
  76. 10.1007/s00710-014-0343-5 · DOI · Paper page
  77. 10.1093/oso/9780195109207.001.0001 · DOI
  78. 10.1046/j.0263-4929.2001.00345.x · DOI
  79. 10.1139/e80-178 · DOI
  80. 10.1016/j.gca.2020.02.017 · DOI
  81. 10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025<0995:QSLIHG>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  82. 10.1111/j.1751-908X.2009.00032.x · DOI
  83. 10.1093/petrology/egh094 · DOI
  84. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.01.002 · DOI
  85. Norris A. &Danyushevsky L.(2011).Towards estimating the complete uncertainty budget of quantified results measured by LA‐ICP‐MS. InGoldschmidt Abstracts pp.1894.
  86. 10.1111/jmg.12172 · DOI
  87. 10.2138/rmg.2009.70.3 · DOI · Paper page
  88. Pyle J. M., 1999, Yttrium zoning in garnet: Coupling of major and accessory phases during metamorphic reactions, Geological Materials Research, 1, 1
  89. 10.1007/s00410-017-1339-z · DOI
  90. Rice A. H. N., 2006, Textural sector‐zoning in garnet: Theoretical patterns and natural examples from Alpine metamorphic rocks, Austrian Journal of Earth Sciences, 99, 70
  91. 10.1180/minmag.1991.055.380.08 · DOI
  92. 10.1016/j.precamres.2008.08.005 · DOI · Paper page
  93. 10.1016/0301-9268(95)00023-2 · DOI
  94. 10.1139/e93-034 · DOI
  95. 10.1111/j.1525-1314.2011.00927.x · DOI
  96. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120299 · DOI
  97. 10.1016/j.gr.2023.04.011 · DOI
  98. 10.1016/j.epsl.2009.01.013 · DOI
  99. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03165.x · DOI
  100. 10.1016/j.gca.2017.12.003 · DOI
  101. 10.1016/S0012-821X(04)00012-3 · DOI
  102. Spear F. S., 1998, Three‐dimensional imaging of garnet porphyroblast sizes and chemical zoning: nucleation and growth history in the garnet zone, Geological Materials Research, 1, 1
  103. 10.1111/j.1525-1314.2007.00704.x · DOI
  104. 10.1007/BF00303447 · DOI
  105. Tamblyn R., 2021, In‐situ laser ablation Lu‐Hf geochronology of garnet across the Western Gneiss Region: campaign‐style dating of metamorphism, Journal of the Geological Society, 179, jgs2021
  106. Thompson J. B., 1957, The graphical analysis of mineral assemblages in pelitic schists, American Mineralogist, 42, 842
  107. 10.1016/j.gca.2004.09.025 · DOI
  108. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2007.03.017 · DOI
  109. 10.1007/s004100050419 · DOI
  110. 10.1016/j.gsf.2018.04.001 · DOI
  111. 10.1016/S0016-7037(01)00644-5 · DOI
  112. 10.1180/mgm.2021.43 · DOI
  113. 10.1111/j.1525-1314.2005.00597.x · DOI
  114. 10.1046/j.1525-1314.2000.00269.x · DOI
  115. 10.1046/j.1525-1314.2000.00234.x · DOI
  116. 10.2475/ajs.301.7.627 · DOI
  117. 10.2138/am-2022-8455 · DOI
  118. 10.1046/j.0263-4929.2001.00323.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gaidies, F., Mccarron, T., Simpson, A. D., Easton, R. M., Glorie, S., Putlitz, B., & Trebus, K.
Affiliations
  • Department of Earth Sciences Carleton University Ottawa Canada
  • Department of Earth Sciences St. Francis Xavier University Antigonish Canada
  • Department of Earth Sciences The University of Adelaide Adelaide Australia
  • Ontario Geological Survey Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Sudbury Canada
  • Department of Earth Sciences The University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland
Venue
Journal of Metamorphic Geology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-09-16
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
35-61
ISSN
  • 0263-4929
  • 1525-1314
Cited by
16
References
0
Language
en
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (315857, 315160)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review