The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Polymetamorphism during the Grenvillian Orogeny in SE Ontario: Results from trace element mapping, in situ geochronology, and diffusion geospeedometry
Abstract
The Flinton Group is a metasedimentary succession of the Grenville Province in SE Ontario, potentially allowing insight into the tectono‐thermal evolution of continental crust during the Mesoproterozoic. At its Green Bay locality, Flinton Group metapelites of the staurolite zone contain abundant, post‐kinematic garnet porphyroblasts. Whereas the larger garnet crystals are typically impinged, smaller crystals are isolated from each other, occasionally exhibiting elongated shapes with apparently trigonal morphology. Central sections of the garnet population of a representative sample reveal that garnet is composed of different compositional and microstructural domains. In the largest crystals of the population, garnet contains rectangular to rhombic domains, marked by sharp increases in the concentrations of Nb, V, Ti, and Cr. These domains are associated with irregularly shaped patches, characterized by spatially heterogenous enrichments of Ca and LREE, and depletions in the contents of P, Y, MREE, and HREE, accompanied by increased densities of comparatively coarse‐grained quartz inclusions hosting apatite. Microstructural relationships indicate that these domains correspond to portions of garnet that pseudomorphed biotite, with the enrichments of Nb, V, Ti, and Cr outlining the original biotite shapes. The compositional patterns formed by Ca, P, Y, and REE indicate that apatite participated in the grain‐fluid interactions that operated during the metasomatic replacement of biotite by garnet. The statistical analyses of the garnet number and size distributions confirm that garnet initially nucleated on biotite, controlled by the kinetics of attachment and detachment processes at the garnet/biotite interface, resulting in the typical impingement habit. In situ Lu–Hf garnet geochronology applied to garnet that did not pseudomorph biotite, and hence is enriched in HREE, points to a first metamorphic event at c. 1080 31 Ma. Subsequent pseudomorphism of staurolite by white mica in a Al 2 O 3 ‐ and FeO‐mobile system resulted in the concomitant crystallization of a new garnet generation, forming overgrowths on the first garnet generation and nuclei in the fine‐grained matrix. Garnet that nucleated during this event grew to isolated and elongated crystals with apparently trigonal morphology, aligned in a direction c. perpendicular to the rock matrix foliation. The open‐system behaviour during this event limits the use of whole‐rock‐based geochronological and thermobarometrical applications. However, previously published in situ U–Pb ages of monazite included in the rims of the garnet crystals and in the rock matrix indicate that this event took place at c. 976 4 Ma, likely associated with a period of increased hydrothermal activity late in the metamorphic history of the Grenvillian Orogeny. Diffusion geospeedometry calculations indicate that garnet growth during this hydrothermal event lasted for less than 6 Myr.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent data from the Flinton group (Mazinaw domain) are consistent with early garnet growth at 1080 ±31 Ma (Lu-Hf garnet) overgrown by ca.975 Ma (Rigolet-age) rims (U-Pb, monazite included in garnet rims).
“For instance, recent data from the Flinton group (Mazinaw domain, Fig. 3) are consistent with early garnet growth at 1080 ±31 Ma (Lu-Hf garnet) overgrown by ca.975 Ma (Rigolet-age) rims (U-Pb, monazite included in garnet rims) (Gaidies et al. 2023;McCarron et al. 2014);”
From The Grenville Province: revisiting the orogenic framework and integrating recent findings (2025) · cites this paper as Gaidies et al. 2023
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 118
- 10.2475/ajs.294.9.1061 · DOI
- 10.2113/gselements.9.6.439 · DOI
- 10.1093/petrology/egaa055 · DOI
- 10.1029/95TC03501 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF00371361 · DOI
- 10.1180/minmag.1991.055.380.03 · DOI
- 10.2138/am.2006.2043 · DOI
- 10.1080/00206814.2010.496184 · DOI
- 10.1002/gj.3350300303 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00377479 · DOI
- 10.1144/0016-76492006-115 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1525-1314.1994.tb00048.x · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-019-51214-9 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00296579 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1525-1314.2002.00395.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1525-1314.1993.tb00155.x · DOI
- 10.1139/e95-081 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00310739 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0305004100023197 · DOI
- 10.1130/0091-7613(1998)026<0503:TDPOGN>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1525-1314.1999.00200.x · DOI
- 10.4095/205286 · DOI
- 10.2138/am.2010.3354 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1525-1314.1997.00007.x · DOI
- Easton R. M., 1992, The Grenville Province and the Proterozoic history of central and southern Ontario. Vol. Special Volume 4, Part 2, Ontario Geological Survey, book section, 19, 713
- Easton R. M., 2001, Precambrian Geology, Mazinaw Lake Area. Map, 1:50000 Ministry of Energy
- Easton R. M., 2006, Precambrian Geology, Cloyne‐Plevna‐Ompah Area. Map, 1:50000 Ministry of Energy
- 10.1111/j.1525-1314.2004.00532.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.lithos.2019.03.002 · DOI
- 10.1093/petrology/egac118 · DOI
- 10.1111/jmg.12680 · DOI
- 10.1180/minmag.2010.074.1.111 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00310683 · DOI
- Ford F. D.(2002).Progressive metamorphism of Flinton Group pelitic schists Grenville Province Southeastern Ontario Carleton University Phd thesis.
- 10.1130/G50542.1 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1525-1314.2006.00648.x · DOI
- 10.1007/s00410-007-0263-z · DOI
- 10.1130/G48715.1 · DOI
- 10.1111/jmg.12648 · DOI
- Gaidies F., 2017, Metamorphic mineral reactions: Porphyroblast, corona and symplectite growth, EMU Notes in Mineralogy, 16, 469
- 10.1111/jmg.12562 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00410-011-0635-2 · DOI
- 10.1111/jmg.12108 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00410-017-1372-y · DOI
- 10.1111/jmg.12539 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00410-018-1503-0 · DOI
- 10.2113/gselements.11.3.171 · DOI
- 10.2138/am.2005.1498 · DOI
- 10.1130/0091-7613(1987)15<573:TZIAMG>2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1130/GES00631.1 · DOI
- Hirsch D. M., 2000, An evaluation of spatial correlation functions in textural analysis of metamorphic rocks, Geological Materials Research, 2, 1
- 10.1111/j.1525-1314.1998.00140.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00410-003-0464-z · DOI
- 10.1126/science.154.3757.1647 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1039/b804760j · DOI
- Jackson S. E., 2008, Calibration strategies for elemental analysis by LA‐ICP‐MS, Mineralogical Association of Canada Short Course Series, 40, 169
- 10.1144/gsjgs.122.1.0029 · DOI
- 10.1111/jmg.12053 · DOI
- 10.1130/GES00001.1 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1525-1314.2012.00978.x · DOI
- 10.1127/0935-1221/2007/0019-1749 · DOI
- 10.1016/0024-4937(74)90025-5 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1525-1314.1993.tb00134.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1525-1314.2006.00647.x · DOI
- 10.1180/mgm.2021.55 · DOI
- 10.1093/petrology/egab077 · DOI
- Lane K. M.(2011).Metamorphic and geochronological constraints on the evolution of the Kalinjala Shear Zone Eyre Peninsula. (Hons thesis) University of Adelaide Adelaide.
- 10.1016/0016-7037(95)00320-Y · DOI
- 10.1016/0016-7037(79)90158-3 · DOI
- 10.2113/econgeo.110.6.1425 · DOI
- Lawley C. J. M., 2020, Precious metal mobility during serpentinization and breakdown of base metal sulphide, Lithos, 105278, 354
- 10.1111/j.1525-1314.1986.tb00347.x · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00373040 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-8123.2007.00179.x · DOI
- 10.1093/petrology/egp050 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00710-014-0343-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/oso/9780195109207.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.0263-4929.2001.00345.x · DOI
- 10.1139/e80-178 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gca.2020.02.017 · DOI
- 10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025<0995:QSLIHG>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1751-908X.2009.00032.x · DOI
- 10.1093/petrology/egh094 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.01.002 · DOI
- Norris A. &Danyushevsky L.(2011).Towards estimating the complete uncertainty budget of quantified results measured by LA‐ICP‐MS. InGoldschmidt Abstracts pp.1894.
- 10.1111/jmg.12172 · DOI
- 10.2138/rmg.2009.70.3 · DOI · Paper page
- Pyle J. M., 1999, Yttrium zoning in garnet: Coupling of major and accessory phases during metamorphic reactions, Geological Materials Research, 1, 1
- 10.1007/s00410-017-1339-z · DOI
- Rice A. H. N., 2006, Textural sector‐zoning in garnet: Theoretical patterns and natural examples from Alpine metamorphic rocks, Austrian Journal of Earth Sciences, 99, 70
- 10.1180/minmag.1991.055.380.08 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.precamres.2008.08.005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0301-9268(95)00023-2 · DOI
- 10.1139/e93-034 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1525-1314.2011.00927.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120299 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gr.2023.04.011 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.epsl.2009.01.013 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03165.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gca.2017.12.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0012-821X(04)00012-3 · DOI
- Spear F. S., 1998, Three‐dimensional imaging of garnet porphyroblast sizes and chemical zoning: nucleation and growth history in the garnet zone, Geological Materials Research, 1, 1
- 10.1111/j.1525-1314.2007.00704.x · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00303447 · DOI
- Tamblyn R., 2021, In‐situ laser ablation Lu‐Hf geochronology of garnet across the Western Gneiss Region: campaign‐style dating of metamorphism, Journal of the Geological Society, 179, jgs2021
- Thompson J. B., 1957, The graphical analysis of mineral assemblages in pelitic schists, American Mineralogist, 42, 842
- 10.1016/j.gca.2004.09.025 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2007.03.017 · DOI
- 10.1007/s004100050419 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gsf.2018.04.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0016-7037(01)00644-5 · DOI
- 10.1180/mgm.2021.43 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1525-1314.2005.00597.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1525-1314.2000.00269.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1525-1314.2000.00234.x · DOI
- 10.2475/ajs.301.7.627 · DOI
- 10.2138/am-2022-8455 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.0263-4929.2001.00323.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Grenville Province: revisiting the orogenic framework and integrating recent findings
Indares, A. (2025) · Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences · doi:10.1139/cjes-2023-0143 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Gaidies, F., Mccarron, T., Simpson, A. D., Easton, R. M., Glorie, S., Putlitz, B., & Trebus, K.
- Affiliations
- Department of Earth Sciences Carleton University Ottawa Canada
- Department of Earth Sciences St. Francis Xavier University Antigonish Canada
- Department of Earth Sciences The University of Adelaide Adelaide Australia
- Ontario Geological Survey Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Sudbury Canada
- Department of Earth Sciences The University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland
- Venue
- Journal of Metamorphic Geology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-09-16
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 35-61
- ISSN
- 0263-4929
- 1525-1314
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (315857, 315160)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review