Improving Access to Maternity Care for Women with Opioid Use Disorders: Colocation of Midwifery Services at an Addiction Treatment Program
Abstract
Perinatal drug and alcohol use is associated with serious medical and psychiatric morbidity for pregnant and postpartum women and their newborns. Participation in prenatal care has been shown to improve outcomes, even in the absence of treatment for substance use disorders. Unfortunately, women with substance use disorders often do not receive adequate prenatal care. Barriers to accessing care for pregnant women with substance use disorders include medical and psychiatric comorbidities, transportation, caring for existing children, housing and food insecurity, and overall lack of resources. In a health care system where care is delivered by each discipline separately, lack of communication between providers causes poorly coordinated services and missed opportunities. The integration of mental health and substance use treatment services in medical settings is a goal of health care reform. However, this approach has not been widely promoted in the context of maternity care. The Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center Perinatal Addiction Treatment Program provides an integrated model of care for pregnant and postpartum women with substance use disorders, including the colocation of midwifery services in the context of a dedicated addiction treatment program. A structured approach to screening and intervention for drug and alcohol use in the outpatient prenatal clinic facilitates referral to treatment at the appropriate level. Providing midwifery care within the context of a substance use treatment program improves access to prenatal care, continuity of care throughout pregnancy and the postpartum, and availability of family planning services. The evolution of this innovative approach is described. This article is part of a special series of articles that address midwifery innovations in clinical practice, education, interprofessional collaboration, health policy, and global health.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Barriers continue to limit access to evidence-based supports for mothers and infants affected by substance use disorders.
“barriers continue to limit access to evidence-based supports (Goodman, 2015; Peacock-Chambers et al., 2020; Peacock-Chambers et al., 2021; Schiff et al., 2022; Trost et al., 2022)”
From Home‐based family recovery supports: Feasibility, acceptability, and adoption of training home visitors in “Mothering from the Inside Out” (2025) · cites this paper as Goodman, 2015
Cites
Concomitance between childhood sexual and physical abuse and substance use problems
Simpson, T. L., & Miller, W. R. (2002) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/s0272-7358(00)00088-x · Cited by 532 · see citing works
Treatment of opioid-dependent pregnant women: Clinical and research issues
Jones, H. E., Martin, P. R., Heil, S. H., Kaltenbach, K., Selby, P., Coyle, M. G., Stine, S. M., O'Grady, K. E., Arria, A. M., & Fischer, G. (2008) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2007.10.007 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Moylan, P. L., Jones, H. E., Haug, N. A., Kissin, W. B., & Svikis, D. S. (2001) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/s0306-4603(00)00141-6 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Midwifery continuity of care: a scoping review of where, how, by whom and for whom?
Bradford, B. F., Wilson, A. N., Portela, A., McConville, F., Fernandez Turienzo, C., & Homer, C. S. E. (2022) · PLOS Global Public Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0000935 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Women-centered drug treatment models for pregnant women with opioid use disorder: a scoping review
Joshi, C., Skeer, M. R., Chui, K., Neupane, G., Koirala, R., & Stopka, T. J. (2021) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108855 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Peacock‐Chambers, E., Jurkowski, B. L., Kangas, S., DeCoste, C., McMahon, T. J., Borelli, J. L., Feinberg, E., Byatt, N., Zayde, A., Lowell, A. F., et al. (2025) · Infant Mental Health Journal: Infancy and Early Childhood · doi:10.1002/imhj.70019
- Authors
- Goodman, D.
- Corresponding author
- Goodman, Daisy
- ORCID
- Goodman, Daisy
- Venue
- Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 706-712
- ISSN
- 1526-9523 (ISSN-L)
- 1542-2011
- OpenAlex
- W2272478275
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 4.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Dartmouth College
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Keywords
- opioid use disorder, perinatal substance use, obstetric care, midwifery services, prenatal care access, integrated care, postpartum care, family planning, barriers to care
- MeSH terms
- Community Mental Health Services, Continuity of Patient Care, Family Planning Services, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Hospitals, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Mass Screening, Maternal Health Services, Midwifery, Opioid-Related Disorders, New Hampshire, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Prenatal Care, Referral and Consultation, Models, Nursing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review