Women's Experiences of Seeking and Receiving Psychological and Psychosocial Interventions for Postpartum Depression: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of the Qualitative Literature
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Postpartum depression (PPD) is a serious maternal disorder that can have adverse effects on maternal and infant health. The importance of offering effective and acceptable treatments is well recognized, particularly given the numerous barriers women in many settings face in accessing interventions for PPD. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize qualitative research exploring women's experiences of professional psychological and psychosocial support for PPD. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted in April 2017 by searching 5 electronic databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, Ovid, and Web of Science). Qualitative research studies published in English that explored women's experiences of professional psychosocial support for PPD were included, whereas studies exploring women's experiences of antidepressant medication only were excluded. Seventeen articles met inclusion criteria and were appraised for methodologic quality. Data were synthesized using the interpretive thematic synthesis method. Results: Four main themes were identified: the process of help‐seeking, barriers to seeking and accepting support, valued aspects of support, and outcomes. Women found the process of seeking help difficult, with several barriers preventing them from both seeking and accepting professional support. Despite this, women described the support received as beneficial and particularly valued the therapeutic relationship. Women reported 1) feeling more positive and confident after receiving a psychological and/or psychosocial intervention and 2) experiencing better relationships with their infant and other family members. Discussion: Although seeking and accepting professional support for PPD was a difficult process, women highly valued mental health care support and perceived it as beneficial. Clinical services should aim to address the barriers women face in accessing mental health care and empower women to feel in control throughout the process, offering interventions appropriate to each woman's personal circumstance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many women do not receive treatment for postpartum depression for various reasons, including a lack of trust in the mental health system, fear and stigma associated with taking medications, guilt, and concerns about the effects of medications on breastfeeding.
“Yet, many women do not receive treatment for various reasons, including a lack of trust in the mental health system, fear and stigma associated with taking medications, guilt, and concerns about the effects of medications on breastfeeding [13, 14].”
From Challenges in diagnosing and treating postpartum depression in the primary care Setting- a qualitative study (2025) · cites this paper as [13]
Cites
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · International Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007 · Cited by 12,156 · see citing works
Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 · Cited by 9,312 · see citing works
Now I see it, now I don’t: researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research
Berger, R. (2015) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794112468475 · Cited by 4,031 · see citing works
Gulliver, A., Griffiths, K. M., & Christensen, H. (2010) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/1471-244x-10-113 · Cited by 3,292 · see citing works
Clement, S., Schauman, O., Graham, T., Maggioni, F., Evans-Lacko, S., Bezborodovs, N., Morgan, C., Rüsch, N., Brown, J. S. L., & Thornicroft, G. (2015) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291714000129 · Cited by 3,152 · see citing works
Beyond PICO: The SPIDER Tool for Qualitative Evidence Synthesis
Cooke, A., Smith, D., & Booth, A. (2012) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732312452938 · Cited by 2,608 · see citing works
Pearlstein, T., Howard, M., Salisbury, A., & Zlotnick, C. (2009) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.033 · Cited by 462 · see citing works
Stephens, S., Ford, E., Paudyal, P., & Smith, H. (2016) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.1967 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Duffecy, J., Grekin, R., Long, J. D., Mills, J. A., & O'Hara, M. (2022) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.05.123 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Rojas, G., Guajardo, V., Martínez, P., & Fritsch, R. (2018) · Revista médica de Chile · doi:10.4067/s0034-98872018000901001 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Reducing psychiatric illness in the perinatal period: A review and commentary
Rohr, J., Vahidy, F. S., Bartek, N., Bourassa, K. A., Nanavaty, N. R., Antosh, D. D., Harms, K. P., Stanley, J. L., & Madan, A. (2023) · World Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.5498/wjp.v13.i4.149 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Krepak, D. K., Kopit, A. B., Biderman, A., Yehoshua, I., & Adler, L. (2025) · BMC Primary Care · doi:10.1186/s12875-025-03004-8 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hadfield, H., & Wittkowski, A.
- Affiliations
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Wittkowski, Anja
- ORCID
- Wittkowski, Anja
- Venue
- Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-11
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 723-736
- ISSN
- 1526-9523 (ISSN-L)
- 1542-2011
- OpenAlex
- W2771950207
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 0.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Keywords
- postpartum depression, help-seeking, barriers to mental health care, psychosocial interventions, psychological intervention, therapeutic relationship, women's experiences, maternal mental health, access to mental health care, mother-infant relationship
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Mothers, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Postnatal Care, Psychotherapy, Social Support, Depression, Postpartum, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review