Cited by 53Neuroendocrine Tumor Research AdvancesIntraperitoneal and Appendiceal MalignanciesGastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society ( ENETS ) 2023 guidance paper for appendiceal neuroendocrine tumours ( aNET )

Open access

Abstract

The aim of the present guidance paper is to update the previous ENETS guidelines on well differentiated appendiceal neuroendocrine tumours (NET), providing practical guidance for the diagnosis and management of appendiceal NET (aNET); poorly differentiated neoplasms are dealt with in a separate guidance paper. This paper is structured on a question‐answer format in order to also address controversial issues and areas where uncertainty regarding the management and follow‐up of aNET exists. All recommendations are offered on the basis of the best available evidence, along with the authors' experiences in managing these neoplasms. Each recommendation for treatment will provide a level of evidence and grade of recommendation as per the GRADE system (adapted in Infectious Disease Society of United States Public Health Service grading system).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jne.13332

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neuroendocrine tumors can present in varied morphologic forms and are frequently not detectable through intraoperative visualization alone.

    “Neuroendocrine tumors can present in varied morphologic forms and are frequently not detectable through intraoperative visualization alone, emphasizing the critical role of histopathological assessment.”

    From Selective Appendectomy in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery for Endometriosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study (2025) · cites this paper as [30]

    Section 2 describes distinct histological types of appendiceal neuroendocrine tumours, and Section 3 says they may not be visible to the surgeon; Section 3.2 adds that most are not detected on macroscopic examination. These passages support the point for appendiceal tumours, but do not establish it for neuroendocrine tumours generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous studies have reported that even normal-appearing appendices may harbor intraluminal pathology, which can be missed without tissue analysis.

    “Previous studies have reported that even normal-appearing appendices may harbor intraluminal pathology, which can be easily missed without tissue analysis, potentially allowing disease progression if left in situ [30,31].”

    From Selective Appendectomy in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery for Endometriosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study (2025) · cites this paper as [30]

    Section 3 (page unavailable) says small appendiceal neuroendocrine tumours may be invisible to the surgeon and even to the pathologist on macroscopic examination, and recommends sectioning the tissue for examination. This supports the risk of missing pathology by appearance alone, but the paper does not specify that the pathology is intraluminal or address appendiceal pathology beyond these tumours. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Couvelard A, 2019, Digestive System Tumours WHO Classification of Tumours, 152

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kaltsas, G., Walter, T., Knigge, U., Toumpanakis, C., Santos, A. P., Begum, N., Pape, U. F., Volante, M., Frilling, A., & Couvelard, A.
Affiliations
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • Hôpital Edouard Herriot (FR)
  • Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
  • The Royal Free Hospital (GB)
  • IPO Porto (PT)
  • Johannes Wesling Klinikum Minden (DE)
  • Asklepios Klinik St. Georg (DE)
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Université Paris Cité (FR)
Corresponding author
Kaltsas, Gregory
Venue
Journal of Neuroendocrinology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-09-08
Volume
35
Issue
10
Pages
e13332-e13332
ISSN
  • 0953-8194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2826
OpenAlex
W4385878808
Cited by
53
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 18
FWCI
10.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
Keywords
well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, diagnosis, follow-up, Enets, appendiceal neoplasms
MeSH terms
Appendiceal Neoplasms, Europe, Humans, Societies, Medical, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Neuroendocrine Tumors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review