Distilling agro‐extractivism: Agave and tequila production in Mexico
Open accessAbstract
This article seeks to challenge the notion that the concept of agro‐extractivism be restricted to crops destined for export with little or no processing. Based on a study of agave and tequila production in Mexico, it argues that the domestic processing of biomass does not change nor necessarily compensate for the negative social and environmental impacts of upstream agricultural activities; it can in fact add to them. We seek to demonstrate this to be the case for industrialized agave–tequila production by adopting an approach that traces the flows of materials, pollutants and money, taking into consideration the degree to which transnational companies control the agave–tequila value chain, the portion of tequila that is exported, technologies, company–farmer and company–worker relations, relevant public policy, and environmental and social impacts. We analyse the polluting consequences of industrialized tequila production and show how the expansion and intensification of agave production since the mid‐1990s has been characterized by increasing volumes of biomass extraction, the emergence or exacerbation of different forms of environmental degradation, the marginalization of small‐scale agave farmers, and deteriorating working conditions for agave‐field workers. In addition, we briefly discuss traditional mezcal production as a socially and ecologically sustainable alternative model.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Agro-extractivism and forestry extractivism have since come under the broad banner of green extractivism.
“Agro-extractivism (Veltmeyer & Petras, 2014; Tetreault et al., 2021; McKay et al., 2021) and forestry extractivism (Kröger, 2016; Ehrnström-Fuentes & Kröger, 2018; Ramcilovic-Suominen et al., 2022) have since come under the broad banner of green extractivism.”
From The political ecologies of "green" extractivism(s): An introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Tetreault et al., 2021
Focusing solely on classical attributes of extractivism leads to overlooking networked and accumulative regional impacts and the entire supply-webs of agricultural mechanization, chemical inputs and pesticides, and digital applications and surveillance integrated into plantations.
“Focusing solely on the classical (state-centric) attributes of extractivism (McKay, 2020; McKay et al., 2021) leads to overlooking networked and accumulative regional impacts (Tetreault et al., 2021), but also the entire supply-webs of agricultural mechanization, the production of chemical inputs and pesticides as well as the digital applications and surveillance integrated into plantations”
From The political ecologies of "green" extractivism(s): An introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Tetreault et al., 2021
Cites
Cáceres, D. M. (2015) · Journal of Agrarian Change · doi:10.1111/joac.12057 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The political ecologies of "green" extractivism(s): An introduction
Dunlap, A., Verweijen, J., & Tornel, C. (2024) · Journal of Political Ecology · doi:10.2458/jpe.6131 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
“…(state-centric) attributes of extractivism (McKay, 2020; McKay et al. , 2021) leads to overlooking networked and accumulative regional impacts (Tetreault et al. , 2021), but also the entire supply-webs of agricultural mechanization, the production of chemical inputs and pesticides as well as…”
Background
- Authors
- Tetreault, D., McCulligh, C., & Lucio, C.
- Affiliations
- Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas "Francisco García Salinas" (MX)
- Chapingo Autonomous University (MX)
- Corresponding author
- Tetreault, Darcy
- Venue
- Journal of Agrarian Change
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-01-05
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 219-241
- ISSN
- 1471-0358 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-0366
- OpenAlex
- W3118442963
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 13.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Agrarian Change (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (A1‐S‐21674)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Extractivism and Socioeconomic Issues
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Latin American rural development
- Keywords
- agroextractivism, Agave, tequila production, mezcal, environmental degradation, smallholder farmers, multinational corporations, value chain, industrial agriculture, working conditions, sustainable alternatives, Mexico
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review