Cited by 8Skin Protection and AgingFacial Rejuvenation and Surgery TechniquesDermatologic Treatments and Research

Comparative efficacy of two anti‐aging products containing retinyl palmitate in healthy human volunteers

Farooq, Umar, Mahmood, Tariq, Shahzad, Yasser, Yousaf, Abid M, Akhtar, Naveed·2018·Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology

Abstract

Summary: Background: No study yet described the comparative efficacy of two over‐the‐counter ( OTC ) anti‐aging products in Asian subjects using the techniques involving analysis of living skin. Aim: We sought to evaluate the anti‐aging efficacy of two commercial formulations containing retinyl palmitate using a high‐resolution UVA video camera. Method: Total 11 healthy male volunteers, agreed to participate in this single‐blind split‐face design study with the mean age of 25.5 years. Every night, volunteers applied one type of cream on the left side and other type of cream on the right side of the face, as directed according to the study design for 60 days. Measurements of the parameters were taken at 0, 1st, 7th, 15th, 30th, and 60th day of study period using noninvasive UVA video camera Visioscan ® VC 98. Cream applied on right side of the face labeled as “R” and on the left side as “L.” Results: Sixty‐day use of the creams showed significant improvement in SELS parameters of the skin. Percent change in skin wrinkling ( SE w) parameter calculated after 60 days was −6.68% after applying cream R and −8.27% after applying cream L. Conclusion: We concluded that constituents in both creams have potentially influenced skin surface parameters, thus indicating that, these creams as a better option to lessen the effects of aging on facial skin on long‐term application.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jocd.12500

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 11 healthy volunteers, two formulations of retinyl palmitate used for 60 days significantly improved skin smoothness, roughness, scaliness, and wrinkles.

    “A study of 11 healthy volunteers using two formulations of retinyl palmitate for 60 days reported significant improvements in skin smoothness, skin roughness, scaliness, and wrinkles with both formulations [71].”

    From Sunscreens and Photoaging: A Review of Current Literature (2021) · cites this paper as [71]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farooq, U., Mahmood, T., Shahzad, Y., Yousaf, A. M., & Akhtar, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Central Punjab (PK)
  • Islamia University of Bahawalpur (PK)
Corresponding author
Farooq, Umar
Venue
Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-01-24
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
454-460
ISSN
  • 1473-2130 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-2165
OpenAlex
W2792856616
Cited by
8
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of The Central Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Cosmetics Laboratory of The Islamia University Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Keywords
retinyl palmitate, anti-aging cosmetics, skin aging, skin wrinkling, split-face study, facial skin
MeSH terms
Retinyl Esters, Adult, Antioxidants, Diterpenes, Face, Humans, Male, Vitamin A, Skin Aging, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Skin Cream, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review