The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What does the literature tell us about health workers' experiences of task‐shifting projects in sub‐Saharan Africa? A systematic, qualitative review
Open accessAbstract
Aims and Objectives: To review systematically, qualitative literature covering the implementation of task shifting in sub‐Saharan Africa to address the growing interest in interventions of this kind. This review aims to distil the key practical findings to both guide a specific project aiming to improve the quality of neonatal care in Kenya and to contribute to the broader literature. Background: Task‐shifting programmes aim to improve access to healthcare by delegating specific tasks from higher to lower skilled health workers. Evidence suggests that task‐shifting programmes in sub‐Saharan Africa may improve patient outcomes, but they have also been criticised for providing fragmented, unsustainable services. This systematic review of qualitative literature summarises factors affecting implementation of task shifting and how such interventions in sub‐Saharan Africa may have affected health workers' feelings about their own positions and their ability to provide care. Design: Following literature search, a modified Critical Appraisal Skills Program ( CASP ) framework was used to assess quality. Thereafter, analysis adopted a thematic synthesis approach. Methods: A systematic literature search identified qualitative studies examining task ‐shifting interventions in sub‐Saharan Africa. Thematic synthesis was used to identify overarching themes arising from across the studies and infer how task‐shifting interventions may impact on the health workers from whom tasks are being shifted. Results: From the 230 studies screened, 13 met the inclusion criteria. Overarching themes identified showed that task shifting has been associated with jurisdictional debates linked to new cadres working beyond their scope of practice, and tension around compensation and career development for those taking on tasks that were being delegated. Conclusions: Based on the qualitative data available, it appears that task shifting may negatively impact the sense of agency and the ability to perform of health workers' from whom tasks are shifted. The potential implications of task shifting on all health workers should be considered prior to implementing task‐shifting solutions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 · Cited by 9,312
The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor
Abbott, A. (1988) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226189666.001.0001 · Cited by 7,733
Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions
Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2005) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1258/1355819054308530 · Cited by 3,190
Joshi, R., Alim, M., Kengne, A. P., Jan, S., Maulik, P. K., Peiris, D., & Patel, A. A. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103754 · Cited by 589
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- BAPM, 2001, Standards for Hospitals Providing Neonatal Intensive and High Dependency Care
- 10.3109/09540261.2010.536152 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00064-3 · DOI · Paper page
- CASP UK, 2013, Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Qualitative Research Checklist
- 10.1016/j.midw.2013.05.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/bmj.g2225 · DOI
- 10.1186/1478-4491-5-27 · DOI
- 10.1093/heapol/czt026 · DOI
- Ford N, 2012, Safety of task‐shifting for male medical circumcision: a systematic review and meta‐analysis, Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, 26, 559
- 10.1186/1478-4491-9-1 · DOI
- Geertz C, 1973, The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays
- 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.10.023 · DOI
- Glenton C, 2013, Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lay health worker programmes to improve access to maternal and child health: qualitative evidence synthesis, Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews, 10.1002/14651858.CD010414 · DOI · Paper page
- Hannes K, 2011, Supplementary Guidance for Inclusion of Qualitative Research in Cochrane Systematic Reviews of Interventions
- 10.1002/14651858.CD007331.pub3 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60496-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/1478-4491-7-49 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2393-15-S2-S7 · DOI
- NANN, 2009, Position Statement #3009 – Minimum RN Staffing in NICUs
- NCK, 2014, Kenya Nursing Workforce Report – The Status of Nursing in Kenya, 2012
- Noyes J, 2011, Supplementary Guidance for Inclusion of Qualitative Research in Cochrane Systematic Reviews of Interventions
- 10.1186/1478-4491-12-6 · DOI
- WHO, 2008, Task Shifting: Global Recommendations and Guidelines. Members Document
- WHO, 2012, WHO Recommendations: Optimizing Health Worker Roles to Improve Access to Key Maternal and Newborn Health Interventions through Task Shifting
- WHPA, 2008, Health Professions Demand Strong Principles for Task Shifting
- 10.1186/1471-2458-13-997 · DOI
- 10.1186/1472-6963-14-184 · DOI
- 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.11-0665 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12913-015-0685-7 · DOI
- 10.1186/1478-4491-5-27 · DOI
- 10.1186/1472-6963-12-61 · DOI
- 10.1186/1478-4491-10-34 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0061601 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1032 · DOI
- 10.1186/1472-698X-12-27 · DOI
- 10.1186/1472-6963-14-S1-S4 · DOI
- 10.1186/1478-4491-12-24 · DOI
- Spies LA, 2014, An Exploratory Descriptive Study on Task Shifting
- 10.1186/1471-2458-13-997 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Mijovic, H., McKnight, J., & English, M.
- Affiliations
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine London UK
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KE)
- Corresponding author
- McKnight, Jacob
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-06-23
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 15-16
- Pages
- 2083-2100
- ISSN
- 0962-1067 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2702
- PMC
- PMC4973696
- OpenAlex
- W2471425431
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 0.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Nursing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Greater South Information System
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (#097170)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health Workforce Issues
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health and Surgery
- Keywords
- task shifting, health worker experiences, sub-Saharan Africa, neonatal care, scope of practice, career development, sense of agency, healthcare workers
- MeSH terms
- Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Workload, Africa South of the Sahara, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review