Hospital discharge processes involving older adults living with dementia: An integrated literature review
Abstract
Aims and objectives To identify barriers and facilitators to engagement of people with dementia and family carers in planning for discharge from hospital. Background Hospital discharge can be particularly challenging for older people with dementia. To assist in the development of bespoke discharge processes that address the unique needs of older people with dementia, an integrated review of the literature was undertaken. Design and methods A four-stage integrative review framework guided the review. Three search strategies were employed: a computerised database search, a hand search of reference lists and forward citation searching. Paired members of the research team reviewed eligible full-text papers. The methodological quality of each paper was assessed using the Mixed-Methods Assessment Tool, followed by data extraction and completion of summary tables. Within and across study analysis and synthesis of study findings was undertaken using thematic synthesis. Results Fifteen papers were included in the review. Most identified barriers to collaborative discharge processes related to distributed responsibility for discharge, risk averse approaches to discharge, limited family carer confidence, and limited validation of assumptions about family competency to manage at home. Facilitators included supported clinician and family carer engagement, and maintaining independence for activities of daily living. Relevance to clinical practice Reflective analysis of discharge decisions,…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Healthcare professionals responsible for discharge planning are more likely to learn 'on the job' and training programmes often lack follow-up over time, limiting sustained improvements.
“Research has also found that HCPs responsible for discharge planning are more likely to learn ‘on the job’ and training programmes often lack follow-up over time, limiting sustained improvements [102, 107, 108].”
From Do hospital-to-home transitions work for older adults with multiple long-term conditions including dementia? A realist review (2025) · cites this paper as [108]
Cites
PRISMA-P Group, Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 · Cited by 26,223 · see citing works
Pace, R., Pluye, P., Bartlett, G., Macaulay, A. C., Salsberg, J., Jagosh, J., & Seller, R. (2012) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.07.002 · Cited by 1,331 · see citing works
Fitzgerald, L. R., Bauer, M., Koch, S. H., & King, S. J. (2011) · Australian Health Review · doi:10.1071/ah09811 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Emmett, C., Poole, M., Bond, J., & Hughes, J. C. (2014) · International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family · doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebu012 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Richardson, A., Blenkinsopp, A., Downs, M., & Lord, K. (2019) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-019-1220-1 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Saragosa, M., Jeffs, L., Okrainec, K., & Kuluski, K. (2022) · Dementia · doi:10.1177/14713012211031779 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Lawson, L., Cooper, M., Tolley, C., Hand, A., & Nazar, H. (2025) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-025-06123-0 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“Research has also found that HCPs responsible for discharge planning are more likely to learn ‘on the job’ and training programmes often lack follow-up over time, limiting sustained improvements [102, 107, 108].”
Provencher, V., Viscogliosi, C., Lacerte, J., D’Amours, M., Mailhot-Bisson, D., Gagnon, L., & Lacombe, G. (2024) · Journal of Patient Experience · doi:10.1177/23743735241259553 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Stockwell‐Smith, G., Moyle, W., Marshall, A. P., Argo, A., Brown, L., Howe, S., Layton, K., Naidoo, O., Santoso, Y., Soleil‐Moudiky‐Joh, E., & Grealish, L.
- Affiliations
- Griffith University (AU)
- Nambour General Hospital (AU)
- Mackay Base Hospital (AU)
- Queensland Health (AU)
- Cairns Hospital (AU)
- Queensland Department of Education (AU)
- Townsville Hospital (AU)
- Gold Coast Hospital (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Grealish, Laurie
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-01-15
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- e712-e725
- ISSN
- 0962-1067 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2702
- OpenAlex
- W2767099825
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Queensland Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Keywords
- discharge planning, dementia, older adults, family caregivers, barriers and facilitators, risk aversion, family involvement, activities of daily living, discharge decision-making, family meetings, functional decline prevention, cognitive decline prevention
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Communication, Dementia, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Patient Discharge, Caregivers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review