Cited by 35Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Hospital discharge processes involving older adults living with dementia: An integrated literature review

Stockwell‐Smith, Gillian, Moyle, Wendy, Marshall, Andrea P, Argo, Alison, Brown, Laura, Howe, Shelley, Layton, Keith, Naidoo, Ornissa +3 more·2018·Journal of Clinical Nursing

Abstract

Aims and objectives To identify barriers and facilitators to engagement of people with dementia and family carers in planning for discharge from hospital. Background Hospital discharge can be particularly challenging for older people with dementia. To assist in the development of bespoke discharge processes that address the unique needs of older people with dementia, an integrated review of the literature was undertaken. Design and methods A four-stage integrative review framework guided the review. Three search strategies were employed: a computerised database search, a hand search of reference lists and forward citation searching. Paired members of the research team reviewed eligible full-text papers. The methodological quality of each paper was assessed using the Mixed-Methods Assessment Tool, followed by data extraction and completion of summary tables. Within and across study analysis and synthesis of study findings was undertaken using thematic synthesis. Results Fifteen papers were included in the review. Most identified barriers to collaborative discharge processes related to distributed responsibility for discharge, risk averse approaches to discharge, limited family carer confidence, and limited validation of assumptions about family competency to manage at home. Facilitators included supported clinician and family carer engagement, and maintaining independence for activities of daily living. Relevance to clinical practice Reflective analysis of discharge decisions,…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jocn.14144

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stockwell‐Smith, G., Moyle, W., Marshall, A. P., Argo, A., Brown, L., Howe, S., Layton, K., Naidoo, O., Santoso, Y., Soleil‐Moudiky‐Joh, E., & Grealish, L.
Affiliations
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • Nambour General Hospital (AU)
  • Mackay Base Hospital (AU)
  • Queensland Health (AU)
  • Cairns Hospital (AU)
  • Queensland Department of Education (AU)
  • Townsville Hospital (AU)
  • Gold Coast Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Grealish, Laurie
Venue
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-01-15
Volume
27
Issue
5-6
Pages
e712-e725
ISSN
  • 0962-1067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2702
OpenAlex
W2767099825
Cited by
35
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
Queensland Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
discharge planning, dementia, older adults, family caregivers, barriers and facilitators, risk aversion, family involvement, activities of daily living, discharge decision-making, family meetings, functional decline prevention, cognitive decline prevention
MeSH terms
Aged, Communication, Dementia, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Patient Discharge, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review