Cited by 3Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHospital Admissions and OutcomesGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Risk Management During the Transition From Hospital to Home: A Multiple Case Study Documenting the Experience of Patients Living With a Major Neurocognitive Disorder, Their Caregivers, and Healthcare Professionals

Open access
Provencher, Véronique, Viscogliosi, Chantal, Lacerte, Julie, D’Amours, Monia, Mailhot-Bisson, Didier, Gagnon, Lise, Lacombe, Guy·2024·Journal of Patient Experience

Abstract

Understanding the risks in the months following hospital discharge is crucial for healthcare professionals to ensure the need for assistance is met. However, this may be challenging in the case of patients living with a major neurocognitive disorder (PLMNCD). Thus, it is important to incorporate patients’ and caregivers’ experiences of the transition from hospital to home in the risk assessment. This multiple case study comprised 7 PLMNCD, their caregivers, and occupational therapists. Fifty-four interviews, conducted just before, as well as 3 weeks and 3 to 6 months after hospital discharge, were qualitatively analyzed. Results revealed that risk management during the hospital-to-home transition is a dynamic process aimed at establishing a satisfactory routine while avoiding adverse events. This risk management process, which identifies challenges over time and between stakeholders, involves (a) determining the seriousness and acceptability of risks, (b) reflecting on ways to manage risks, and (c) taking steps to manage risks. This knowledge will help to provide more appropriate care and services that strike a balance between safety and autonomy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/23743735241259553

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Carers' knowledge (e.g., health literacy, the patient's care needs) was linked to their experience of carer burden, and use of urgent care after returning home, and contributed to the ways they engaged with information provided at discharge.

    “Carers’ knowledge (e.g., health literacy, the patient’s care needs) was linked to their experience of carer burden, and use of urgent care after returning home, and contributed to the ways they engaged with information provided at discharge [43, 44, 57, 59, 60, 64, 66, 67].”

    From Do hospital-to-home transitions work for older adults with multiple long-term conditions including dementia? A realist review (2025) · cites this paper as [67]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Lack of training and unpreparedness was linked to emotional distress in carers and increased hospital readmissions for patients when care needs were unmet.

    “Subsequently, this was linked to emotional distress in carers, and increased hospital readmissions for patients when care needs were unmet (CMOC27) [44, 46, 47, 53, 67].”

    From Do hospital-to-home transitions work for older adults with multiple long-term conditions including dementia? A realist review (2025) · cites this paper as [67]

    The Results describe caregivers’ risk of burnout, and the Discussion reports that many patients and caregivers felt overwhelmed during hospitalization. The Introduction notes a high rate of potentially avoidable rehospitalizations among patients with a major neurocognitive disorder. But the paper does not link lack of caregiver training or unpreparedness to distress, or unmet care needs to increased readmissions. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Provencher, V., Viscogliosi, C., Lacerte, J., D’Amours, M., Mailhot-Bisson, D., Gagnon, L., & Lacombe, G.
Affiliations
  • Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
  • Centre de recherche sur le vieillissement (CA)
  • Research Centre on Aging, Sherbrooke, Canada
Corresponding author
Provencher, Véronique
Venue
Journal of Patient Experience
Published
2024-01
Volume
11
Pages
23743735241259553-23743735241259553
ISSN
  • 2374-3735 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-3743
OpenAlex
W4401341900
Cited by
3
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Patient Experience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Alzheimer Society Research Program (Application Number 16-16)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
hospital-to-home transition, risk management, major neurocognitive disorder, dementia, caregivers, occupational therapists, patient experience, risk assessment, post-discharge care, adverse events

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review