Impacts of technology implementation on nurses' work motivation, engagement, satisfaction and well‐being: A realist review
Open accessAbstract
Aim: To examine current literature for causal explanations on how, why and under what circumstances, implementation of a new hospital electronic medical record system or similar technology impacts nurses' work motivation, engagement, satisfaction or well‐being. Background: Implementation of new technology, such as electronic medical record systems, affects nurses and their work, workflows and inter‐personal interactions in healthcare settings. Multiple individual and organisational‐level factors can affect technology adoption by nurses and may have negative consequences for nurses and patient safety. Design: Five‐step realist review method and Realist And Meta‐narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards checklist was used to guide this review. Eight initial theories (programme theories) were used as the basis to explore, examine and refine literature from a range of sources. Data Sources: Literature from five databases (APA PsycInfo, CINAHL, Embase, IEEE Xplore and MEDLINE Complete) and grey literature (from 1 January 2000 to 31 October 2021) were systematically searched and retrieved on 4 November 2021. Results: In all, 8980 records were screened at the title and abstract level, of which 1027 full texts were screened and 10 were included in the review. Seven studies assessed concepts in both pre‐ and post‐technology implementation. Most common contexts related to knowledge, rationale and skills to use new technology. Mechanisms that impacted nurses or nursing care delivery included: nurses' involvement in technology implementation processes; nurses' perceptions, understanding and limitations of technology impact(s) on patient care delivery; social supports; skills; implementation attitude and hardware. Work satisfaction was the most frequently examined outcome. An analysis led to nine final programme theories (including two original, six revised and one new programme theory). Conclusion: Nurses must be informed about the rationale for new technology and have the knowledge and skills for its use. Understanding nurses' work motivation and attitudes related to technology adoption in the workplace can support work engagement, satisfaction and well‐being. Implications for the Profession: Complex contexts and mechanisms play a role in nurses' work motivation, engagement, satisfaction and well‐being with the implementation of new technology into healthcare settings. Relevance to Clinical Practice: Nurses, their work and workflows are all influenced by the implementation of new technologies (such as electronic medical records), which in turn has consequences for patient safety and quality of care. Patient or Public Contribution: No patient or public contribution. Prospero Registration Number: CRD42020131875 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=131875).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 · Cited by 108,283 · see citing works
Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions
Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2005) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1258/1355819054308530 · Cited by 3,190 · see citing works
Designing for Motivation, Engagement and Wellbeing in Digital Experience
Peters, D., Calvo, R. A., & Ryan, R. M. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00797 · Cited by 797 · see citing works
Realist synthesis: illustrating the method for implementation research
Rycroft-Malone, J., McCormack, B., Hutchinson, A. M., DeCorby, K., Bucknall, T. K., Kent, B., Schultz, A., Snelgrove-Clarke, E., Stetler, C. B., Titler, M., et al. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-33 · Cited by 742 · see citing works
Self-citationPersonal and work-related factors associated with nurse resilience: A systematic review
Yu, F., Raphael, D., Mackay, L., Smith, M., & King, A. (2019) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.02.014 · Cited by 456 · see citing works
Physician Burnout in the Electronic Health Record Era: Are We Ignoring the Real Cause?
Downing, N. L., Bates, D. W., & Longhurst, C. A. (2018) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m18-0139 · Cited by 418 · see citing works
RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses
Wong, G., Greenhalgh, T., Westhorp, G., Buckingham, J., & Pawson, R. (2013) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.12095 · Cited by 385 · see citing works
The impact of electronic health record systems on clinical documentation times: a systematic review
Baumann, L. A., Baker, J., & Elshaug, A. G. (2018) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.05.014 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Systematic searching for theory to inform systematic reviews: is it feasible? Is it desirable?
Booth, A., & Carroll, C. (2015) · Health Information & Libraries Journal · doi:10.1111/hir.12108 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Jedwab, R. M., Manias, E., Redley, B., Dobroff, N., & Hutchinson, A. M.
- Affiliations
- Deakin University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Jedwab, Rebecca M.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-04-21
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 17-18
- Pages
- 6037-6060
- ISSN
- 0962-1067 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2702
- OpenAlex
- W4366602321
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Nursing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
- Keywords
- electronic health records, technology implementation, nurses, employee motivation, work engagement, job satisfaction, nurse well-being, technology adoption, nursing competencies, social support, patient safety, nursing care delivery, healthcare workflow, program theory, nursing leadership and management, nursing education, nursing informatics
- MeSH terms
- Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Motivation, Nurses, Personal Satisfaction, Workplace
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review