Cited by 75Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesNursing care and researchPalliative and Oncologic Care

Caregiver burden among family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer in a palliative context: A mixed‐method study

Zhang, Yalin, Zhang, Shu, Liu, Chunhua, Chen, Xiaoli, Ding, Yuxin, Guan, Chang, Hu, Xiaolin·2023·Journal of Clinical Nursing

Abstract

Aim To examine the multidimensional properties of caregiver burden among family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer in a palliative context. Design A sequential, explanatory, mixed-method study was performed. Methods Family caregivers of patients diagnosed with advanced cancer were recruited from a palliative care department of a third-level hospital in Sichuan Province, China. The Caregiver Burden Inventory, Social Support Rating Scale and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale were used to collect quantitative data, and a total of 150 caregivers were recruited from January 2022 to September 2022. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews, and a total of 22 caregivers were interviewed from October 2022 to November 2022. Survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and the factors of caregiver burden were identified using the Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis H test and Spearman correlations. Interpretative phenomenological analysis was performed to analyse the interview data to initially explore the multidimensions of caregiver burden. The following-a-thread method and convergence coding matrix were used for triangulation to examine the multidimensional properties of caregiver burden. Results The participants experienced a moderate level of caregiver burden (32.97 ± 13.09). Through triangulation, six meta-themes and nine meta-subthemes were identified as multidimensional properties of caregiver burden, including physical (too many cari…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jocn.16872

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Y., Zhang, S., Liu, C., Chen, X., Ding, Y., Guan, C., & Hu, X.
Affiliations
Sichuan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Hu, Xiaolin
Venue
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-09-14
Volume
32
Issue
21-22
Pages
7751-7764
ISSN
  • 0962-1067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2702
OpenAlex
W4386725405
Cited by
75
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 17
FWCI
19.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • China Medical Board (Grant#22‐482)
  • National Basic Research Program of China (2021YFE0206600)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
caregiver burden, family caregivers, advanced cancer, palliative care, emotional burden, social support, economic burden, physical burden, COVID-19 prevention and control, marital relationships, family communication, death education, resilience, social interaction, spousal caregiving
MeSH terms
Caregiver Burden, Adult, Aged, China, Family, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Palliative Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Caregivers, Cost of Illness, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review