Cited by 30Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareNursing care and research

The effect of targeted palliative care interventions on depression, quality of life and caregiver burden in informal caregivers of advanced cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Yan, Qianwen, Zhu, Chuanmei, Li, Linna, Li, Yunhuan, Chen, Yang, Hu, Xiaolin·2024·International Journal of Nursing Studies

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To investigate the efficacy of targeted palliative care interventions on depression, quality of life and caregiver burden in informal caregivers of advanced cancer patients, along with the consequences of various intervention types. DESIGN This study performed a comprehensive review and a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. METHOD An extensive search was carried out across eight databases, namely, PubMed, Embase, CLNAHL, PsyclNFO, Cochrane, VIP, CNKI, and WANFANG, spanning from the inception of the library to May 4, 2024. Two examiners independently screened the articles and extracted the data according to the eligibility criteria formulated in accordance with the PICOS principles. The meta-analysis was conducted utilizing the StataCorp (version 16.0), estimating the impacts of the interventions through the computation of the standardized mean difference (SMD) and the 95 % confidence interval (CI). Sensitivity analysis was carried out using a one-way-out method. Egger's test and the Duval and Tweedie trim-and-fill methods were used to explore the potential publication bias. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies, and the overall quality of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE method. RESULTS This study pooled 16 RCTs (including 2046 informal caregivers) that were published from 2007 to 2023. The meta-analysis results indicated that the targeted palliative care interventions significantly improved depression (SMD = -0.74, 95 % CI: [-1.25, -0.23], P < 0.01) and quality of life (SMD = 0.63, 95 % CI: [0.08, 1.17], P = 0.03), though not in terms of caregiver burden (SMD = -0.33, 95 % CI: [-0.95, 0.29], P = 0.30) among informal caregivers of advanced cancer patients. Analysis of the subgroups revealed a correlation between short-term interventions, under three months, and the improvement of depression. Strategies focused solely on caregivers have proven effective in alleviating depression. Interventions utilizing offline methods have been shown to not only lower depression levels but also improve the quality of life for caregivers. CONCLUSIONS The targeted palliative care interventions effectively improved informal caregivers' depression and quality of life, yet they fail to markedly lessen the caregiver burden. To better support informal caregivers, interveners ought to adopt personalized strategies based on comprehensive consideration of the duration, format, and delivery methods of the interventions. Simultaneously, further exploration and effort from scholars are necessary to enhance the accessibility of palliative care services, and to effectively incorporate academic research findings into clinical practice. REGISTRATION CRD42023475620.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104895

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Li, 2021, Effects of family dignity intervention on primary caregivers of advanced malignant tumor patients, J. Nurs. Admin. (China), 21, 741
  2. Luo, 2019, Effects of hospice care on negative emotion and psychological stress of primary caregivers of patients with advanced concer, Hainan Med. J. (China), 30, 129
  3. Nian, 2022, Effect of individual reminiscence therapy on anticipatory grief and quality of life in spouses of young patients with advanced cancer, Tianjin J. Nurs. (China), 30, 283
  4. Wang, 2017, The effect of hospice on the negative mood and psychological stress of the main caregivers of terminally elderly tumor patients, Hebei Med. J. (China), 39, 3506
  5. Xiao, 2020, Family dignity lntervention for main caregivers of advanced cancer patients, J. Nurs. (China), 27, 68
  6. Yang, 2017, Effects of Living with Hope Program on family caregivers of patients with advanced lung cancer, Chin. J. Nurs. (China), 52, 920
  7. Zhang, 2021, The impact of hospice care on the psychological stress and self-efficacy of family members of end-stage cancer patients, Chin. Gen. Pract. Nurs. (China), 19, 3992

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Yan, Q., Zhu, C., Li, L., Li, Y., Chen, Y., & Hu, X.
Affiliations
Sichuan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Hu, Xiaolin
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-12
Volume
160
Pages
104895
ISSN
0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402316397
Cited by
30
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 11
FWCI
3.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
palliative care interventions, informal caregivers, caregiver depression, quality of life, caregiver burden, advanced cancer, brief intervention, caregiver support programs, family caregivers of cancer patients, intervention efficacy comparison, publication bias, risk of bias, quality of evidence grading
MeSH terms
Caregiver Burden, Depression, Humans, Neoplasms, Palliative Care, Quality of Life, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review