Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 7

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of nutritional interventions on cognitive function in adult cancer survivors: A systematic review

Lu, Yao, Yuan, Hua, Li, Yan, Liu, YingLin, Li, Rui, Diao, Yue, Chen, JiaLu, Jia, LuYao, Dong, XueQi, Xue, Hui, Zhang, XiuYing·2024·Journal of Clinical Nursing
DOI 10.1111/jocn.17371
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of nutritional interventions (i.e. nutritional support, dietary patterns and dietary supplements) on cognitive function in cancer survivors. Design: Systematic review. Methods: A systematic and comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and CINAHL was conducted from the inception until March 10, 2023. The last search was conducted on December 10, 2023. Reporting Method: PRISMA. Results: A total of 59 randomized controlled trials were included for analysis. Nutritional support, dietary patterns and dietary supplements improved cognitive function in cancer survivors with no apparent safety concerns. The anti‐inflammatory diet, the fasting‐mimicking diet and the web‐based diet significantly improved cognitive function. Whereas the ketogenic diet or dietary advice to consume more soluble dietary fibres and less insoluble dietary fibres and lactose could not. There was evidence from dietary supplements to support the beneficial effects of polyunsaturated fatty acid supplements, traditional herbal medicines and other supplements. Conclusions: Nutritional interventions have great promise for improving cognitive function in adult cancer survivors. Further validation of the nutritional interventions supported in this study in other survivors and exploration of more effective nutritional interventions are needed. Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care: This work can support the construction of nutritional support interventions and dietary guidance programs to prevent cancer‐related cognitive decline. Impact: This work filled a gap in preventive strategies for cancer‐related cognitive decline from a nutritional perspective. Nutritional support, dietary patterns, and dietary supplements can prevent cancer‐related cognitive decline without serious safety concerns. This work highlighted nutritional interventions that have the potential to improve cognitive function in cancer survivors, benefiting the further construction of evidence‐based nutritional intervention programs. Protocol Registration: PROSPERO. Patient or Public Contribution: No patient or public contribution.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jocn.17371

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 133

  1. 10.1146/annurev‐clinpsy‐050817‐084903 · DOI
  2. 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.2.485 · DOI
  3. 10.1371/journal.pone.0279628 · DOI
  4. 10.1093/annonc/mdy093 · DOI
  5. 10.26719/2021.27.5.459 · DOI
  6. 10.3390/antiox11030525 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/s00520‐012‐1647‐9 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/gerona/gly166 · DOI
  9. 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000129 · DOI
  10. 10.1080/14737175.2023.2187288 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/pon.3271 · DOI
  12. 10.1186/s13063‐015‐1053‐y · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.05.012 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.3390/antiox11101949 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/s11764‐020‐00870‐2 · DOI
  16. 10.1039/c9fo00913b · DOI
  17. 10.1093/annonc/mdq749 · DOI
  18. 10.1089/acm.2016.0136 · DOI
  19. 10.1080/01635581.2022.2104329 · DOI
  20. 10.1080/01635581.2014.951731 · DOI
  21. 10.1007/s11764‐019‐00796‐4 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/ecc.13303 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.3390/nu12061678 · DOI
  24. 10.1080/01635581.2021.1988118 · DOI
  25. 10.3322/caac.21235 · DOI
  26. 10.1093/jn/nxaa040 · DOI
  27. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.751077 · DOI
  28. 10.3390/nu10010041 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.12669/pjms.332.11925 · DOI
  30. 10.3233/MNM‐200413 · DOI
  31. 10.1007/s11655‐012‐1203‐y · DOI
  32. 10.1007/s00520‐019‐04866‐2 · DOI
  33. 10.1136/bmj‐2022‐071726 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/s00520‐019‐05182‐5 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/nn.4476 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1200/jco.2011.39.4288 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/ejcn.2015.192 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/S1474‐4422(08)70111‐X · DOI
  39. 10.3390/nu14051033 · DOI
  40. 10.1111/ajco.12758 · DOI
  41. 10.1007/s00405‐020‐05798‐y · DOI
  42. 10.1155/2014/416531 · DOI
  43. 10.1007/s00423‐016‐1527‐8 · DOI
  44. 10.3390/cancers15225331 · DOI
  45. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002390 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.mcna.2016.06.011 · DOI
  47. 10.1093/jnci/djab027 · DOI
  48. 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1002/cncr.27430 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.tins.2018.05.001 · DOI
  51. 10.1093/jnci/djz100 · DOI
  52. 10.1002/14651858.MR000026.pub2 · DOI
  53. 10.2147/PRBM.S241431 · DOI
  54. 10.1080/01635581.2018.1513046 · DOI
  55. 10.1007/s00520‐015‐2824‐4 · DOI
  56. 10.1093/annonc/mdw145 · DOI
  57. 10.3109/09540261.2013.864260 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.11.006 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1177/1534735416651968 · DOI
  60. 10.1186/s12937‐020‐00596‐y · DOI
  61. 10.1186/1472‐6882‐12‐172 · DOI
  62. 10.3390/nu11051145 · DOI
  63. 10.1186/s12957‐015‐0485‐x · DOI
  64. 10.1016/j.surg.2018.05.017 · DOI
  65. 10.7257/1053-816X.2021.41.4.179 · DOI
  66. 10.1186/1475‐2891‐11‐52 · DOI
  67. 10.1007/s11864‐021‐00865‐w · DOI
  68. 10.1155/2012/803239 · DOI
  69. 10.1200/JOP.2017.026286 · DOI
  70. 10.1093/annonc/mdz410 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.1186/s12906‐020‐03092‐2 · DOI
  72. 10.1186/1476‐511x‐13‐139 · DOI
  73. 10.1177/1534735417734914 · DOI
  74. 10.1037/neu0000064 · DOI
  75. 10.1007/s10549‐020‐05991‐x · DOI
  76. 10.1177/0883073813487595 · DOI
  77. 10.3322/caac.21731 · DOI
  78. 10.1136/bmjresp‐2014‐000061 · DOI
  79. 10.1159/000525775 · DOI
  80. 10.1159/000494490 · DOI
  81. 10.3390/nu12082232 · DOI
  82. 10.1016/j.jff.2017.01.041 · DOI
  83. 10.3390/healthcare11040591 · DOI
  84. 10.1017/s1478951507000442 · DOI
  85. 10.1002/cam4.3766 · DOI
  86. 10.1016/j.clnu.2006.01.014 · DOI
  87. 10.3390/ijerph20032295 · DOI
  88. 10.1002/pon.6073 · DOI · Paper page
  89. 10.22038/AJP.2021.18132 · DOI
  90. 10.1371/journal.pone.0231379 · DOI
  91. 10.1007/978‐3‐030‐73234‐9_1 · DOI
  92. 10.1080/13696998.2020.1859843 · DOI
  93. 10.1089/acm.2018.0159 · DOI
  94. 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.11.025 · DOI
  95. 10.1016/j.nut.2019.110558 · DOI
  96. 10.1037/a0036834 · DOI
  97. 10.3390/nu12113403 · DOI
  98. 10.1054/bjoc.1999.0913 · DOI
  99. 10.1007/s00520‐021‐06532‐y · DOI
  100. 10.1002/cam4.6598 · DOI
  101. 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.01.035 · DOI
  102. 10.3390/bs12080271 · DOI
  103. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02096 · DOI
  104. 10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.030 · DOI
  105. 10.3322/caac.21763 · DOI · Paper page
  106. 10.1007/s00520‐014‐2311‐3 · DOI
  107. 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.2.485 · DOI
  108. 10.1016/j.clnesp.2018.08.002 · DOI
  109. 10.4067/s0718‐18762015000100002 · DOI
  110. 10.1016/j.plefa.2017.03.006 · DOI
  111. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002304 · DOI · Paper page
  112. 10.1186/s12986‐016‐0113‐y · DOI
  113. 10.1038/s41598‐021‐81654‐1 · DOI
  114. 10.1111/jocn.16614 · DOI
  115. 10.1038/ejcn.2011.214 · DOI
  116. 10.1002/pros.23317 · DOI
  117. 10.1002/pon.5698 · DOI
  118. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.800314 · DOI
  119. 10.1007/s00520‐022‐07008‐3 · DOI
  120. 10.1080/01635581.2022.2044061 · DOI
  121. 10.1007/s00520‐022‐07241‐w · DOI
  122. 10.1016/j.ejon.2012.06.002 · DOI
  123. 10.3390/cancers13246191 · DOI
  124. 10.1007/s00520‐023‐07620‐x · DOI · Paper page
  125. 10.1016/j.nut.2022.111835 · DOI
  126. 10.3322/caac.21258 · DOI
  127. 10.1111/1759‐7714.15177 · DOI
  128. 10.1089/neu.2004.21.1457 · DOI · Paper page
  129. 10.21037/atm‐21‐5422 · DOI
  130. 10.1016/j.hermed.2021.100499 · DOI
  131. 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.01.021 · DOI
  132. 10.1097/NCC.0000000000001124 · DOI
  133. 10.1155/2012/809614 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Lu, Y., Yuan, H., Li, Y., Liu, Y., Li, R., Diao, Y., Chen, J., Jia, L., Dong, X., Xue, H., & Zhang, X.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-07-17
Volume
33
Issue
11
Pages
4227-4253
ISSN
  • 0962-1067
  • 1365-2702
DOI
10.1111/jocn.17371
Cited by
7
References
5
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of nutritional interventions on cognitive function in adult cancer survivors: A systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jocn.17371
The paper
Lu, Y., Yuan, H., Li, Y., Liu, Y., Li, R., Diao, Y., Chen, J., Jia, L., Dong, X., Xue, H., & Zhang, X. (2024). Effects of nutritional interventions on cognitive function in adult cancer survivors: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17371

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.