The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SKILLS MISMATCH: CONCEPTS, MEASUREMENT AND POLICY APPROACHES
Abstract
The term skills mismatch is very broad and can relate to many forms of labour market friction, including vertical mismatch, skill gaps, skill shortages, field of study (horizontal) mismatch and skill obsolescence. In this paper, we provide a clear overview of each concept and discuss the measurement and inter‐relatedness of different forms of mismatch. We present a comprehensive analysis of the current position of the literature on skills mismatch and highlight areas which are relatively underdeveloped and may warrant further research. Using data from the European Skills and Jobs Survey, we assess the incidence of various combinations of skills mismatch across the EU. Finally, we review the European Commission's country‐specific recommendations and find that skills mismatch, when referring to underutilized human capital in the form of overeducation and skills underutilization, receives little policy attention. In cases where skills mismatch forms part of policy recommendations, the policy advice is either vague or addresses the areas of mismatch for which there is the least available evidence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
OECD Skills Outlook 2013: First Results from the Survey of Adult Skills
OECD (2013) · OECD Skills Outlook · doi:10.1787/9789264204256-en · Cited by 907
Overeducation in the Labour Market
McGuinness, S. (2006) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/j.0950-0804.2006.00284.x · Cited by 841
Self-citationThe incidence and wage effects of overeducation
Duncan, G. J., & Hoffman, S. D. (1981) · Economics of Education Review · doi:10.1016/0272-7757(81)90028-5 · Cited by 741
International Labour Office, Geneva
(1962) · The Annals of Occupational Hygiene · doi:10.1093/annhyg/5.1.47 · Cited by 660
Education and job match: The relatedness of college major and work
Robst, J. (2007) · Economics of Education Review · doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2006.08.003 · Cited by 550
The Impact of Surplus Schooling on Earnings: Some Additional Findings
Verdugo, R. R., & Verdugo, N. T. (1989) · The Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.2307/145998 · Cited by 538
Green, F., & Zhu, Y. (2010) · Oxford Economic Papers · doi:10.1093/oep/gpq002 · Cited by 485
Overeducation and Mismatch in the Labor Market
Leuven, E., & Oosterbeek, H. (2011) · Handbook of the economics of education · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-53444-6.00003-1 · Cited by 476
Mismatch in the Spanish Labor Market: Overeducation?
Alba-Ramirez, A. (1993) · The Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.2307/146203 · Cited by 374
The Impact of Overeducation and its Measurement
Verhaest, D., & Omey, E. (2006) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-005-4276-6 · Cited by 265
Cited by
MetaAgents: Large Language Model Based Agents for Decision-Making on Teaming
Li, Y., Sun, L., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.06500 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- McGuinness, S., Pouliakas, K., & Redmond, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Surveys
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-01-23
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 985-1015
- ISSN
- 0950-0804 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6419
- OpenAlex
- W2793064824
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 19.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SKILLS MISMATCH: CONCEPTS, MEASUREMENT AND POLICY APPROACHES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/joes.12254
- The paper
- McGuinness, S., Pouliakas, K., & Redmond, P. (2018). SKILLS MISMATCH: CONCEPTS, MEASUREMENT AND POLICY APPROACHES. Journal of Economic Surveys. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12254
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.