Cited by 11Maternal and fetal healthcareMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsPregnancy and preeclampsia studies

Vaginal delivery after placental abruption with intrauterine fetal death: a 20-year single-center experience

Inoue, Ayami, Kondoh, Eiji, Suginami, Koh, Io, Shingo, Chigusa, Yoshitsugu, Konishi, Ikuo·2017·Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research

Abstract

Abstract Aim The aim of this study was to elucidate the feasibility and safety of vaginal delivery (VD) when placental abruption causes fetal demise. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of women who were managed for placental abruption with intrauterine fetal death at Kyoto University Hospital during the period from 1995 to 2015. Results Sixteen cases were identified during the study period. VD was attempted in 15 cases and was accomplished in 14 (93.3%) cases. The median gestational age was 36 (24–39) weeks, and there were eight primiparas. The median Bishop score on admission was 2.5 (1–9). Eight pregnancies were complicated with pregnancy‐induced hypertension. The median duration of labor was 5 h and 18 min (30 min–12 h 43 min), and the median amount of hemorrhage was 2503 (445–6808) mL. Fresh frozen plasma (≥ 20 U) and red cell concentrate (≥ 10 U) were administered in 10 (71%) and 9 (64%) cases, respectively. Two cases required uterine artery embolization for post‐partum hemorrhage, while there was no case of maternal death or hysterectomy. Patients with Bishop score > 3 (n = 6) experienced shorter‐duration deliveries (P = 0.020) and had significantly larger blood loss volume (P = 0.020) compared to patients with Bishop score ≤ 3. The duration of labor was negatively correlated with the amount of blood loss (R2 = −0.56, P = 0.039). Conclusion After placental abruption with intrauterine fetal death, VD is feasible and safe regardless of gestational age, parity, cervical maturity, and duration of labor when intensive medical resources are available.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jog.13285

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among fetal deaths associated with abruption, patients with Bishop scores >3 had larger blood loss than those with Bishop scores ≤3 (3605 cc versus 1788 cc).

    “Patients with Bishop scores >3 had shorter labors (3:37 hours versus 7:58 hours) and larger blood loss (3605 cc versus 1788 cc) compared to patients with Bishop scores ≤3 (109)”
  • Among fetal deaths associated with abruption, patients with Bishop scores >3 had shorter labors than those with Bishop scores ≤3 (3:37 hours versus 7:58 hours).

    “Patients with Bishop scores >3 had shorter labors (3:37 hours versus 7:58 hours) and larger blood loss (3605 cc versus 1788 cc) compared to patients with Bishop scores ≤3 (109)”
  • In a single-center retrospective cohort study of fetal deaths associated with abruption from 1995-2015, vaginal delivery was successful in 14 of 15 (93.3%) cases that underwent trial of labor.

    “In a single center retrospective cohort study of fetal deaths associated with abruption (1995–2015), vaginal delivery was successful in 14 of 15 (93.3%) cases that underwent trial of labor.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Inoue, A., Kondoh, E., Suginami, K., Io, S., Chigusa, Y., & Konishi, I.
Affiliations
Kyoto University (JP)
Corresponding author
Kondoh, Eiji
Venue
Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-03-28
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
676-681
ISSN
  • 1341-8076 (ISSN-L)
  • 1447-0756
OpenAlex
W2748235017
Cited by
11
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Keywords
vaginal delivery, placental abruption, intrauterine fetal death, Bishop score, cervical maturity, duration of labor, postpartum hemorrhage, uterine artery embolization, blood loss, gestational hypertension, maternal safety
MeSH terms
Abruptio Placentae, Adult, Female, Fetal Death, Humans, Pregnancy, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Delivery, Obstetric, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review