Cited by 12Hormonal and reproductive studiesSperm and Testicular FunctionDoping in Sports

The fertility fitness paradox of anabolic-androgenic steroid abuse in men

Open access
Mossman, J. A., Pacey, A. A.·2019·Journal of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Click here to view the Original article by Dr. H. Horwitz et al.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/joim.12884

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After viewing fitspiration content, men are more likely to engage in excessive exercise and to take anabolic steroids with potential negative health outcomes.

    “After viewing such content, men are more likely to engage in excessive exercise and to take anabolic steroids with potential negative health outcomes (Cafri et al., 2006; Horwitz et al., 2019; Mossman and Pacey, 2019; Tiggemann and Anderberg, 2020).”

    From The degree to which the cultural ideal is internalized predicts judgments of male and female physical attractiveness (2022) · cites this paper as Mossman and Pacey, 2019

    The paper’s abstract links media-associated ideals of muscularity with body enhancement and anabolic-androgenic steroid abuse in men, and describes serious health consequences of steroid abuse. It does not say that viewing fitspiration content makes men more likely to exercise excessively or take steroids. The retrieved abstract has no page label; the copy lists the letter as appearing on pp. 231–232. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mossman, J. A., & Pacey, A. A.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Mossman, J. A.
Venue
Journal of Internal Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-04-10
Volume
286
Issue
2
Pages
231-232
ISSN
  • 0954-6820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2796
OpenAlex
W2940160834
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Doping in Sports
Keywords
anabolic steroids, fertility, male infertility, steroid abuse
MeSH terms
Fertility, Humans, Male, Gonadal Steroid Hormones, Testosterone Congeners, Anabolic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review