Cited by 144Lipid metabolism and disordersLymphatic Disorders and TreatmentsPancreatitis Pathology and Treatment

Familial chylomicronemia syndrome: an under‐recognized cause of severe hypertriglyceridaemia

Baass, A., Paquette, M., Bernard, S., Hegele, R.A.·2020·Journal of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder of chylomicron metabolism causing severe elevation of triglyceride (TG) levels (>10 mmol L -1 ). This condition is associated with a significant risk of recurrent acute pancreatitis (AP). AP caused by hypertriglyceridaemia (HTG) has been associated with a worse prognosis and higher mortality rates compared to pancreatitis of other aetiology. Despite its association with poor quality of life and increased lifelong risk of HTG-AP, few healthcare providers are familiar with FCS. Because this condition is under-recognized, the majority of FCS patients are diagnosed after age 20 often after consulting several physicians. Although other forms of severe HTG such as multifactorial chylomicronemia have been associated with high atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk and metabolic abnormalities, ASCVD and metabolic syndrome are not usually observed in FCS patients. Because FCS is a genetic condition, the optimal diagnosis strategy remains genetic testing. The presence of bi-allelic pathogenic mutations in LPL, APOC2, GPIHBP1, APOA5 or LMF1 genes confirms the diagnosis. However, some cases of FCS caused by autoantibodies against LPL or GPIHBP1 proteins have also been reported. Furthermore, a clinical score for the diagnosis of FCS has been proposed but needs further validation. Available treatment options to lower triglycerides such as fibrates or omega-3 fatty acids are not efficacious in FCS pa…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/joim.13016

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baass, A., Paquette, M., Bernard, S., & Hegele, R. A.
Affiliations
  • Montreal Clinical Research Institute (CA)
  • Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
Baass, A.
Venue
Journal of Internal Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-01-08
Volume
287
Issue
4
Pages
340-348
ISSN
  • 0954-6820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2796
OpenAlex
W2995595339
Cited by
144
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lymphatic Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
Keywords
familial chylomicronemia syndrome, recurrent acute pancreatitis, genetic testing, APOC2, GPIHBP1, APOA5, LMF1, autoantibodies, very low-fat diet, fibrates, omega-3 fatty acids, ANGPTL3 inhibitors, under-recognition
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Humans, Hyperlipoproteinemia Type I, Pancreatitis, Hypertriglyceridemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review