Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 574

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 104 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ambient air pollution and cardiovascular diseases: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta‐analyses

Open access
de Bont, Jeroen, Jaganathan, Suganthi, Dahlquist, Marcus, Persson, Åsa, Stafoggia, Massimo, Ljungman, Petter·2022·Journal of Internal Medicine

Abstract

The available evidence on the effects of ambient air pollution on cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) has increased substantially. In this umbrella review, we summarized the current epidemiological evidence from systematic reviews and meta‐analyses linking ambient air pollution and CVDs, with a focus on geographical differences and vulnerable subpopulations. We performed a search strategy through multiple databases including articles between 2010 and 31 January 2021. We performed a quality assessment and evaluated the strength of evidence. Of the 56 included reviews, the most studied outcomes were stroke (22 reviews), all‐cause CVD mortality, and morbidity (19). The strongest evidence was found between higher short‐ and long‐term ambient air pollution exposure and all‐cause CVD mortality and morbidity, stroke, blood pressure, and ischemic heart diseases (IHD). Short‐term exposures to particulate matter <2.5 μm (PM 2.5), <10 μm (PM 10), and nitrogen oxides (NOx) were consistently associated with increased risks of hypertension and triggering of myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke (fatal and nonfatal). Long‐term exposures of PM 2.5 were largely associated with increased risk of atherosclerosis, incident MI, hypertension, and incident stroke and stroke mortality. Few reviews evaluated other CVD outcomes including arrhythmias, atrial fibrillation, or heart failure but they generally reported positive statistical associations. Stronger associations were found in Asian countries and vulnerable subpopulations, especially among the elderly, cardiac patients, and people with higher weight status. Consistent with experimental data, this comprehensive umbrella review found strong evidence that higher levels of ambient air pollution increase the risk of CVDs, especially all‐cause CVD mortality, stroke, and IHD. These results emphasize the importance of reducing the alarming levels of air pollution across the globe, especially in Asia, and among vulnerable subpopulations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/joim.13467

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 104 references

Cited by

See all 574

Metadata

Authors
de Bont, J., Jaganathan, S., Dahlquist, M., Persson, Å., Stafoggia, M., & Ljungman, P.
Venue
Journal of Internal Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-03-08
Volume
291
Issue
6
Pages
779-800
ISSN
  • 0954-6820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2796
OpenAlex
W4210946742
Cited by
574
References
104
FWCI
15.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ambient air pollution and cardiovascular diseases: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta‐analyses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/joim.13467
The paper
de Bont, J., Jaganathan, S., Dahlquist, M., Persson, Å., Stafoggia, M., & Ljungman, P. (2022). Ambient air pollution and cardiovascular diseases: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta‐analyses. Journal of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.13467

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.