Cited by 15Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk ManagementHealthcare Systems and Public HealthHealth disparities and outcomes

Exceptional longevity in Okinawa: Demographic trends since 1975

Open access
Poulain, Michel, Herm, Anne·2024·Journal of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Demographers have studied the Japanese mortality pattern since Japan became the most longevous population worldwide, half a century ago. Nutrition and lifestyle were considered by epidemiologists, gerontologists and other scientists as the most important reasons explaining the Japanese superiority. In Okinawa, the mortality pattern is even more exceptional, but few demographers have pointed out this exception. Other scientists proposed different explanations – for example some genetic characteristics, less salt and more animal protein in the food, a mild climate, a higher level of activity, a better consideration of the oldest in the population and, globally speaking, a more traditional lifestyle. At the end of the 1980s, lower improvements of mortality among young adults were identified in Okinawa. In 2002, Okinawa fell from the 4th to the 26th place in the ranking of the 47 Japanese prefectures by male life expectancy. This has been considered by the population of Okinawa as a ‘shock’. Our in‐depth analysis of available life tables and associated mortality rates proves that the population of Okinawa is divided into two groups of generations: those born before World War II and those born after. The older generations clearly experience a highly favourable mortality pattern, whereas the younger generations show mortality levels that are definitively higher compared to mainland Japan. This contribution considers which factors may explain such a situation, including the plausible invalidation of the age of some oldest in the population. We plea for in‐depth demographic age validation that will enhance all scientific findings so far and boost the exceptional longevity in Okinawa.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/joim.13764

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Poulain, M., & Herm, A.
Affiliations
Tallinn University (EE)
Corresponding author
Poulain, Michel
Venue
Journal of Internal Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-01-14
Volume
295
Issue
4
Pages
387-399
ISSN
  • 0954-6820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2796
OpenAlex
W4390863176
Cited by
15
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Healthcare Systems and Public Health
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
exceptional longevity, Okinawa, mortality patterns, life expectancy, oldest old, traditional way of life, life tables, Japanese prefectures
MeSH terms
Animals, Climate, Japan, Life Expectancy, Longevity, Male, Nutritional Status

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review