Cited by 128Family Dynamics and RelationshipsSocial Policies and FamilyGender, Labor, and Family Dynamics

Family Policy and Fertility Intentions in 21 European Countries

Billingsley, Sunnee, Ferrarini, Tommy·2014·Journal of Marriage and Family

Abstract

European countries show substantial variation in family policy and in the extent to which policies support more traditional male‐breadwinner or more gender egalitarian earner–carer family arrangements. Using data from the European Social Survey, the authors implemented multilevel models to analyze variation in fertility intentions of 16,000 men and women according to individual‐level characteristics and family policy across 21 European countries. Both traditional and earner–carer family support generosity were positively related to first‐birth intentions for men and women. In contrast, only earner–carer support maintains its positive relationship with second birth intentions. Family policy is not in general related to third and higher order parity intentions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jomf.12097

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effect of cash benefits by parity is mixed, being larger on first births in some studies and on higher order births in others.

    “The results are also mixed when it comes to the effect of cash benefits by parity: being larger on first births in some studies (e.g., Billingsley and Ferrarini 2014) and on higher order births in others (e.g., Harknett, Billari, and Medalia 2014).”

    From Family Policies in Low Fertility Countries: Evidence and Reflections (2025) · cites this paper as Billingsley and Ferrarini 2014

  • Mixed results on the effect of financial support on fertility are obtained when using broader measures of financial support.

    “Mixed results are also obtained when using broader measures of financial support (Billingsley and Ferrarini 2014; Billingsley, Neyer, and Wesolowski 2022).”

    From Family Policies in Low Fertility Countries: Evidence and Reflections (2025) · cites this paper as Billingsley and Ferrarini 2014

  • Expenditures on childcare have a positive impact on the first birth, and earner-carer support has a positive impact on the first and second births but not on the third.

    “Kalwij (2010) reported a positive impact of the expenditures on childcare on the first birth, while Billingsley and Ferrarini (2014) reported a positive impact of their earner-carer support index on the first and second births, but not on the third.”

    From Family Policies in Low Fertility Countries: Evidence and Reflections (2025) · cites this paper as Billingsley and Ferrarini 2014

  • Positive results on fertility were found in a study using an index which combined leave-related schemes and childcare for very young children.

    “Positive results were also found in a study using an index which combined leave-related schemes and childcare for very young children (Billingsley and Ferrarini 2014).”

    From Family Policies in Low Fertility Countries: Evidence and Reflections (2025) · cites this paper as Billingsley and Ferrarini 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Billingsley, S., & Ferrarini, T.
Affiliations
Stockholm University (SE)
Corresponding author
Billingsley, Sunnee
Venue
Journal of Marriage and Family
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-03-04
Volume
76
Issue
2
Pages
428-445
ISSN
  • 0022-2445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3737
OpenAlex
W2103925588
Cited by
128
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3
FWCI
19.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Marriage and the Family (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Policies and Family
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
family policy, fertility intentions, male breadwinner model, gender egalitarianism, cross-national variation, European countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review