The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Production of Inequality: The Gender Division of Labor Across the Transition to Parenthood
Open accessAbstract
Using longitudinal time diary and survey data from a community sample of dual‐earner couples across the transition to parenthood, the authors examined change in divisions of paid and unpaid work and assessed the accuracy of survey data for time use measurement. Mothers, according to the time diaries, shouldered the majority of child care and did not decrease their paid work hours. Furthermore, the gender gap was not present prebirth but emerged postbirth with women doing more than 2 hours of additional work per day compared to an additional 40 minutes for men. Moreover, the birth of a child magnified parents' overestimations of work in the survey data, and had the authors relied only on survey data, gender work inequalities would not have been apparent. The findings have important implications for (a) the state of the gender revolution among couples well positioned to obtain balanced workloads and (b) the utility of survey data to measure parents' division of labor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Cohen, J. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9780203771587 · Cited by 25,373
Becker, G. S. (1991) · doi:10.4159/9780674020665 · Cited by 10,565
WEST, C., & ZIMMERMAN, D. H. (1987) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002 · Cited by 8,954
(2006) · Cited by 3,705
The Second Shift: Working Families and the Revolution at Home
Hochschild, A. R., & Machung, A. (2012) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,230
The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood
Wrigley, J., & Hays, S. (1997) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2655113 · Cited by 2,788
Morris, S. B., & DeShon, R. P. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.105 · Cited by 2,502
The Role of the Father in Child Development
Leventhal, B. L. (1983) · Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-198311000-00012 · Cited by 2,373
The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home
Brines, J., Hochschild, A., & Machung, A. (1990) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/352858 · Cited by 2,230
Is Anyone Doing the Housework? Trends in the Gender Division of Household Labor
Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/79.1.191 · Cited by 2,047
Cited by
The Application of Social Role Theory to the Study of Gender in Politics
Schneider, M. C., & Bos, A. L. (2019) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12573 · Cited by 240
Kamp Dush, C. M., Yavorsky, J. E., & Schoppe-Sullivan, S. J. (2018) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-017-0841-0 · Cited by 122
Self-citationBasili, E., Zuffianò, A., Pastorelli, C., Thartori, E., Lunetti, C., Favini, A., Cirimele, F., Di Giunta, L., Gerbino, M., Bacchini, D., et al. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0251437 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Yavorsky, J. E., Kamp Dush, C. M., & Schoppe‐Sullivan, S. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Marriage and Family
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-04-28
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 662-679
- ISSN
- 0022-2445 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3737
- OpenAlex
- W2079993001
- Cited by
- 490
- References
- 75
- FWCI
- 54.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Production of Inequality: The Gender Division of Labor Across the Transition to Parenthood. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jomf.12189
- The paper
- Yavorsky, J. E., Kamp Dush, C. M., & Schoppe‐Sullivan, S. J. (2015). The Production of Inequality: The Gender Division of Labor Across the Transition to Parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12189
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
