Relationship satisfaction and commitment in the transition to parenthood: A couple-centered approach
Abstract
Abstract Objective To provide a more comprehensive understanding of couple relationship satisfaction, commitment, and the dynamic between the two over the transition to parenthood. Background The transition to parenthood is an ideal time to concurrently study relationship satisfaction and commitment, as this period is filled with familial transitions such as less couple time, more domestic labor, and the formation of parent–child relationships. These familial transitions require significant investments that may constrain people from leaving relationships, potentially leading to diverging relationship satisfaction and commitment trajectories. Method We conducted dyadic latent class growth analyses (DLCGA), assessing variability in relationship satisfaction and commitment trajectories across six time‐points (two prenatal) for 203 couples expecting their first child, through 12 months postpartum. Results We identified four couple classes for relationship satisfaction and three couple classes for relationship commitment. There were 46% of couples who retained high satisfaction and commitment and another 35% of couples who retained moderately high satisfaction and high commitment. Couples reporting lower attachment avoidance, higher relational self‐expansion, and higher perceived partner commitment during pregnancy were more likely to be in classes that maintained high relationship satisfaction and commitment during the transition. Conclusion Our results contrast the prevailing narrative about relational declines during the transition to parenthood. Many couples retain high satisfaction and commitment into the first year of parenthood, with declines driven primarily by a minority of couples. Couples' commitment was particularly likely to be high and stable throughout the transition.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The arrival of children can prompt relationships to change considerably.
“Social. The arrival of children can prompt relationships to change considerably (e.g., divorce, losing/gaining friends, mending family ties) (27–31).”
From A critical need for the concept of matrescence in perinatal psychiatry (2024) · cites this paper as [31]
Cites
An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model
Celeux, G., & Soromenho, G. (1996) · Journal of Classification · doi:10.1007/bf01246098 · Cited by 2,448 · see citing works
Estimating latent structure models with categorical variables: one-step versus three-step estimators
Bolck, A., Croon, M., & Hagenaars, J. (2004) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mph001 · Cited by 1,406 · see citing works
The effect of the transition to parenthood on relationship quality: An 8-year prospective study.
Doss, B. D., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013969 · Cited by 656 · see citing works
Newman, D. A. (2003) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428103254673 · Cited by 626 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Before we calculated total scores for outcomes and predictors, we used maximum likelihood imputation for item-level missing data insofar as missing data constituted less than 20% of the total number of items in a measure (Newman, 2003).”
MethodChanges in relationship satisfaction across the transition to parenthood: a meta-analysis
Mitnick, D. M., Heyman, R. E., & Smith Slep, A. M. (2009) · Journal of Family Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017004 · Cited by 391 · see citing works
Harwood, K., McLean, N., & Durkin, K. (2007) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.1.1 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
The transition to parenthood: Impact on couples’ romantic relationships
Doss, B. D., & Rhoades, G. K. (2017) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.003 · Cited by 191 · cited 4× · see citing works
“A meta-analysis (Mitnick et al., 2009) and a systematic review (Doss & Rhoades, 2017) give weight to concerns about this period, finding that the relationship satisfaction declines on average.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPrenatal expectations and marital satisfaction over the transition to parenthood
Lawrence, E., Nylen, K., & Cobb, R. J. (2007) · Journal of Family Psychology · doi:10.1037/0893-3200.21.2.155 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A critical need for the concept of matrescence in perinatal psychiatry
Athan, A. M. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1364845 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Leonhardt, N. D., Rosen, N. O., Dawson, S. J., Kim, J. J., Johnson, M. D., & Impett, E. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Dalhousie University (CA)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Western University (CA)
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Leonhardt, Nathan D.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Marriage and Family
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-06-26
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 80-100
- ISSN
- 0022-2445 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3737
- OpenAlex
- W3173191394
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7
- FWCI
- 5.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Marriage and the Family (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
- Keywords
- transition to parenthood, relationship satisfaction, relationship commitment, couple relationships, attachment avoidance, pregnancy, postpartum period, new parents, relationship trajectories
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review