The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rethinking Institutions and Organizations
Open accessAbstract
In this P oint–C ounterpoint article we argue that institutional scholarship has become overly concerned with explaining institutions and institutional processes, notably at the level of the organization field, rather than with using them to explain and understand organizations. Especially missing is an attempt to gain a coherent, holistic account of how organizations are structured and managed. We also argue that when institutional theory does give attention to organizations it inappropriately treats them as though they are the same, or at least as though any differences are irrelevant for purposes of theory. We propose a return to the study of organizations with an emphasis upon comparative analysis, and suggest the institutional logics perspective as an appropriate means for doing so.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Organizations
Perrow, C. (1967) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091811 · Cited by 2,509
Cited by
Embracing Causal Complexity: The Emergence of a Neo-Configurational Perspective
Misangyi, V. F., Greckhamer, T., Furnari, S., Fiss, P. C., Crilly, D., & Aguilera, R. (2017) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206316679252 · Cited by 1,099
The dubious role of institutions in international business: A road forward
Aguilera, R. V., & Grøgaard, B. (2019) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-018-0201-5 · Cited by 313
Mainstreaming solar: Stretching the regulatory regime through business model innovation
Huijben, J. C. C. M., Verbong, G. P. J., & Podoynitsyna, K. S. (2016) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.12.002 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Greenwood, R., Hinings, C. R., & Whetten, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-06-26
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1206-1220
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W1809763877
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 55.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rethinking Institutions and Organizations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/joms.12070
- The paper
- Greenwood, R., Hinings, C. R., & Whetten, D. (2014). Rethinking Institutions and Organizations. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12070
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.