The DOI matches its Crossref record; 214 of the 214 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Performance: A Meta‐Analytic Evaluation and Extension
Open accessAbstract
We move the dynamic capabilities view (DCV) forward in two important ways by meta‐analysing prior empirical studies. First, we evaluate the two core theoretical tenets of the DCV: (1) Dynamic capabilities are positively related to performance, and (2) this relationship is stronger in industries with higher levels of technological dynamism. We find support for the former (r c = 0.296) but not for the latter, though results suggest the existence of moderators. Second, we theorize and demonstrate empirically that higher‐order dynamic capabilities are more strongly related to performance than lower‐order dynamic capabilities, lower‐order dynamic capabilities partially mediate the relationship between higher‐order dynamic capabilities and performance, and dynamic capabilities contribute more to performance in developing economies than in developed economies. These findings illustrate how the nature of the dynamic capability and the economic context in which it is utilized shape its value, thus offering a more nuanced conceptualization of the dynamic capabilities‐performance relationship.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage
Barney, J. B. (2004) · Advances in Strategic Management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17018-4 · Cited by 38,152
A resource‐based view of the firm
Wernerfelt, B. (1984) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250050207 · Cited by 25,635
Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package
Viechtbauer, W. (2010) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03 · Cited by 20,464
Teece, D. J. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.640 · Cited by 16,825
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x · Cited by 14,099
Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2002.6587995 · Cited by 10,758
Strategic assets and organizational rent
Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250140105 · Cited by 8,425
Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities
Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780 · Cited by 6,963
A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.12 · Cited by 6,793
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01030.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jinteco.2003.11.007 · doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2003.11.007
- 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E · doi:10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::aid-smj133>3.0.co;2-e
- 10.1037/0021-9010.75.3.334 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.3.334 · Paper page
- 10.1509/jmkg.72.4.1 · doi:10.1509/jmkg.72.4.1 · Paper page
- McGrath R. G., 2013, Transient advantage, Harvard Business Review, 91, 62
- 10.3102/10769986008002157 · DOI · Paper page
- Protogerou A., 2014, Knowledge‐Intensive Entrepreneurship in Low‐Tech Industries, 138
- 10.2307/1252250 · doi:10.2307/1252250 · Paper page
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1 <119::AID-SMJ921>3.0.CO;2-0 · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199707)18:1
- 10.1108/13673270810913676 · doi:10.1108/13673270810913676
- 10.2307/4134351 · doi:10.2307/4134351 · Paper page
- Zahra S. A., 1998, Environmental adversity and the entrepreneurial activities of new ventures, Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 3, 123
Cited by
Schilke, O., Hu, S., & Helfat, C. E. (2018) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2016.0014 · Cited by 1,226
Mikalef, P., & Pateli, A. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.09.004 · Cited by 1,038
Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Bryde, D. J., Giannakis, M., Foropon, C., Roubaud, D., & Hazen, B. T. (2020) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107599 · Cited by 889
Dynamic digital capabilities and supply chain resilience: The role of government effectiveness
Dubey, R., Bryde, D. J., Dwivedi, Y. K., Graham, G., Foropon, C., & Papadopoulos, T. (2023) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108790 · Cited by 473
Khurana, I., Dutta, D. K., & Singh Ghura, A. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.06.048 · Cited by 443
Metadata
- Authors
- Fainshmidt, S., Pezeshkan, A., Lance Frazier, M., Nair, A., & Markowski, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-05-19
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1348-1380
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W2344998635
- Cited by
- 458
- References
- 214
- FWCI
- 57.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Performance: A Meta‐Analytic Evaluation and Extension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/joms.12213
- The paper
- Fainshmidt, S., Pezeshkan, A., Lance Frazier, M., Nair, A., & Markowski, E. (2016). Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Performance: A Meta‐Analytic Evaluation and Extension. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12213
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
