The DOI matches its Crossref record; 112 of the 112 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Managing Technological, Sociopolitical, and Institutional Change in the New Normal
Abstract
A New Normal environment for business has emerged in the years after the 2008 financial crisis based on numerous changes in the world's economic, technological, demographic, and sociopolitical factors. This combination of changes has created a New Normal environment for firms with major implications for managers, strategists, and entrepreneurs alike. It has resulted in an environment with new challenges and opportunities that are considerably different from what firms had to contend with in the years previous. In this paper, we present the main changes that characterize the current New Normal business environment and highlight some key implications for strategy and management. Then, we present the nine articles in this special issue dealing with different dimensions of this new environment for firms. Subsequently, we outline some future research questions that could help to advance our knowledge of the New Normal environment and its implications for firms and management theories. In examining the New Normal, it is important to be reminded that the world is indeed round and even small actions on one side of the globe can have a major impact on organizations on the other side of the globe.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Endogenous Technological Change
Romer, P. M. (1990) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261725 · Cited by 17,711
Endogenous Technological Change
Romer, P. (1989) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w3210 · Cited by 13,303
Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes
Oliver, C. (1991) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1991.4279002 · Cited by 8,950
Mindset: The New Psychology of Success
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2397 · Cited by 7,804
The End of History and the Last Man
Fukuyama, F. (1992) · Cited by 7,535
The End of History and the Last Man.
Fritzsche, P., & Fukuyama, F. (1992) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/2164782 · Cited by 6,496
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012) · ASEAN ECONOMIC BULLETIN · doi:10.1355/ae29-2j · Cited by 5,568
Globalization and Its Discontents
(2015) · The SAGE Encyclopedia of Economics and Society · doi:10.4135/9781452206905.n316 · Cited by 5,477
STRATEGY IN EMERGING ECONOMIES.
Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wright, M. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556394 · Cited by 3,835
Why nations fail: the origins of power, prosperity, and poverty
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-0390 · Cited by 3,643
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahlstrom, D., Arregle, J., Hitt, M. A., Qian, G., Ma, X., & Faems, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-03-06
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 411-437
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W3004417047
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 112
- FWCI
- 36.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Managing Technological, Sociopolitical, and Institutional Change in the New Normal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/joms.12569
- The paper
- Ahlstrom, D., Arregle, J., Hitt, M. A., Qian, G., Ma, X., & Faems, D. (2020). Managing Technological, Sociopolitical, and Institutional Change in the New Normal. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12569
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.