Cited by 46Nursing education and managementHealthcare Education and Workforce IssuesJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

Nursing work environment, value congruence and their relationships with nurses’ work outcomes

Open access
Shao, Jing, Tang, Leiwen, Wang, Xiyi, Qiu, Ruolin, Zhang, Yini, Jia, Yunhua, Ma, Yanyan, Ye, Zhihong·2018·Journal of Nursing Management

Abstract

AIMS: To explore the relationships between work environment, value congruence and nurses' work outcomes; as well as to test the moderating effects of value congruence. BACKGROUND: A poor nursing work environment in most of mainland China has negatively influenced nurses' job satisfaction, burnout and turnover intention. New insights such as improving nurses' value congruence should be proposed to better foster nurses. METHODS: Cross-sectional data were selected from the Chinese Nurses' Environment of Work Status study. In total, 19149 valid samples were collected. Hierarchical regression analyses and simple slope analyses were performed. RESULTS: The correlation coefficients of the variables were all significant (p < .01) and in the expected direction. Value congruence moderated the relationship between nursing work environment and burnout (emotional exhaustion: β = 0.106, p < .01; depersonalization: β = 0.111, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Nursing work environment and value congruence were positively related to job satisfaction, and negatively related to burnout and turnover intention. The adverse impact of poor work environment on nurses' burnout can be buffered if nurses' value congruence is compatible with that of the organisation. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Except for improving the organisational characteristics, value congruence is a useful concept that managers can leverage to improve positive outcomes for both the organisation and its nurses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jonm.12641

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The better rated the work environment, the lower the likelihood of experiencing Emotional Exhaustion and Depersonalisation.

    “four studies found the same relationship, but on both Emotional Exhaustion and Depersonalisation [50, 66, 93, 94]”

    From Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. (2020) · cites this paper as [66]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shao, J., Tang, L., Wang, X., Qiu, R., Zhang, Y., Jia, Y., Ma, Y., & Ye, Z.
Affiliations
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
  • Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital (CN)
  • Huzhou Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Ye, Zhihong
Venue
Journal of Nursing Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-09-16
Volume
26
Issue
8
Pages
1091-1099
ISSN
0966-0429 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2890405740
Cited by
46
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3
FWCI
9.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nursing Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (71373232)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
nursing work environment, value congruence, burnout, job satisfaction, turnover intention, emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, moderating effect, Chinese nurses
MeSH terms
Adult, Burnout, Professional, China, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Male, Middle Aged, Nursing Care, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Values, Workplace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review