The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The job crafting intervention: Effects on job resources, self‐efficacy, and affective well‐being
Open accessAbstract
This quasi‐experimental field study examines the effects of an intervention designed to boost job resources, affective well‐being, and self‐efficacy via job crafting behaviour. Employees ( n = 39) in a D utch police district received a 1‐day training, after which they worked towards self‐set crafting goals for a period of 4 weeks. The intervention concluded with a half‐day reflection session in which learning points were consolidated. Participating in the intervention was expected to boost job resources such as opportunities for development and leader–member exchange ( LMX ), as well as enhance self‐efficacy and positive affect and to reduce negative affect. Repeated measures ANOVA s did not yield significant results. However, pre–post comparison tests showed that the intervention group reported less negative affect as well as increased self‐efficacy, developmental opportunities and LMX in the post‐measure compared with the pre‐measure. The control group ( n = 47) showed no significant changes from pre‐ to post‐measure. In addition, in weeks during which individuals sought more resources, they also reported more developmental opportunities, LMX , and positive affect. Although further research is needed, the job crafting intervention seems to have potential to enable employees to proactively build a motivating work environment and to improve their own well‐being. Practitioner points: Job crafting is proactive behaviour at work that allows employees to redesign their own jobs. In weeks when employees actively focus on building job resources, they also find more job resources and experience more positive affect. The job crafting intervention may help employees to build resources and affective well‐being at work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1989.10488618 · Cited by 99,167
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 54,599
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
Statistical power analyses using G∗Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.41.4.1149 · Cited by 37,615
Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452 · Cited by 15,744
Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective
Bandura, A. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1 · Cited by 15,510
The job demands-resources model of burnout.
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499 · Cited by 13,643
Self-citationThe Job Demands‐Resources model: state of the art
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940710733115 · Cited by 12,996
Self-citationHuman agency in social cognitive theory.
Bandura, A. (1989) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.44.9.1175 · Cited by 8,263
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5 · Cited by 7,299
Cited by
Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward.
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/ocp0000056 · Cited by 6,979
Self-citationRudolph, C. W., Katz, I. M., Lavigne, K. N., & Zacher, H. (2017) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2017.05.008 · Cited by 951
Individual job redesign: job crafting interventions in Healthcare
Gordon, H. J., Demerouti, E., Le Blanc, P. M., Bakker, A. B., Bipp, T., & Verhagen, M. A. M. T. (2018) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2017.07.002 · Cited by 323
Self-citationBoundaryless careers in the gig economy: An oxymoron?
Kost, D., Fieseler, C., & Wong, S. I. (2020) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12265 · Cited by 272
Weekly job crafting and leisure crafting: implications for meaning-making and work engagement
Petrou, P., Bakker, A. B., & van den Heuvel, M. (2017) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.12160 · Cited by 200
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- van den Heuvel, M., Demerouti, E., & Peeters, M. C. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-07-14
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 511-532
- ISSN
- 0963-1798 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8325
- OpenAlex
- W2108593078
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 75
- FWCI
- 45.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The job crafting intervention: Effects on job resources, self‐efficacy, and affective well‐being. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/joop.12128
- The paper
- van den Heuvel, M., Demerouti, E., & Peeters, M. C. W. (2015). The job crafting intervention: Effects on job resources, self‐efficacy, and affective well‐being. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12128
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.