Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 396

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The job crafting intervention: Effects on job resources, self‐efficacy, and affective well‐being

Open access
van den Heuvel, Machteld, Demerouti, Evangelia, Peeters, Maria C. W.·2015·Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology

Abstract

This quasi‐experimental field study examines the effects of an intervention designed to boost job resources, affective well‐being, and self‐efficacy via job crafting behaviour. Employees ( n = 39) in a D utch police district received a 1‐day training, after which they worked towards self‐set crafting goals for a period of 4 weeks. The intervention concluded with a half‐day reflection session in which learning points were consolidated. Participating in the intervention was expected to boost job resources such as opportunities for development and leader–member exchange ( LMX ), as well as enhance self‐efficacy and positive affect and to reduce negative affect. Repeated measures ANOVA s did not yield significant results. However, pre–post comparison tests showed that the intervention group reported less negative affect as well as increased self‐efficacy, developmental opportunities and LMX in the post‐measure compared with the pre‐measure. The control group ( n = 47) showed no significant changes from pre‐ to post‐measure. In addition, in weeks during which individuals sought more resources, they also reported more developmental opportunities, LMX , and positive affect. Although further research is needed, the job crafting intervention seems to have potential to enable employees to proactively build a motivating work environment and to improve their own well‐being. Practitioner points: Job crafting is proactive behaviour at work that allows employees to redesign their own jobs. In weeks when employees actively focus on building job resources, they also find more job resources and experience more positive affect. The job crafting intervention may help employees to build resources and affective well‐being at work.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/joop.12128

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 75 references

Cited by

See all 396

Metadata

Authors
van den Heuvel, M., Demerouti, E., & Peeters, M. C. W.
Venue
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-07-14
Volume
88
Issue
3
Pages
511-532
ISSN
  • 0963-1798 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8325
OpenAlex
W2108593078
Cited by
396
References
75
FWCI
45.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The job crafting intervention: Effects on job resources, self‐efficacy, and affective well‐being. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/joop.12128
The paper
van den Heuvel, M., Demerouti, E., & Peeters, M. C. W. (2015). The job crafting intervention: Effects on job resources, self‐efficacy, and affective well‐being. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12128

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.