Cited by 104Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthImpact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Sexting, Risk Behavior, and Mental Health in Adolescents: An Examination of 2015 Pennsylvania Youth Risk Behavior Survey Data

Frankel, Anne S., Bass, Sarah Bauerle, Patterson, Freda, Dai, Ting, Brown, Deanna·2018·Journal of School Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sexting, the sharing of sexually suggestive photos, may be a gateway behavior to early sexual activity and increase the likelihood of social ostracism. METHODS: Youth Risk Behavior Survey (N = 6021) data from 2015 among Pennsylvania 9th‐12th grade students were used to examine associations between consensual and nonconsensual sexting and substance use, mental health, neighborhood safety, and demographic variables. RESULTS: Almost one‐third (29%) of students reported consensual sexting, while 3% reported nonconsensual sexting. Female students were 49% less likely to report consensual sexting (OR = .69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.54, 0.87]); consensual sexting was significantly more likely in students who reported depressive symptoms (OR = 1.39, 95% CI: [1.10, 1.75]), electronic bullying (OR = 1.46, 95% CI: [1.05, 2.04]), suicide attempts (OR = 1.96, 95% CI: [1.22, 3.17]), current tobacco use (OR = 1.99, 95% CI: [1.30, 3.03]), current alcohol use (OR = 4.23, 95% CI: [3.04, 5.89]), ever having sex (OR = 5.21, 95% CI: [3.87, 7.02]), and reported both ever having sex, and current alcohol use (OR = 7.74, 95% CI: [5.37, 11.14]). CONCLUSIONS: High school students, particularly men, that report sexting may be more likely to participate in other risk behaviors and experience negative mental health outcomes. Further research should clarify the temporality of links between sexting, cyberbullying, depression, and suicide to inform mental health screening and treatment availability in high schools.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/josh.12596

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frankel, A. S., Bass, S. B., Patterson, F., Dai, T., & Brown, D.
Affiliations
  • Temple University (US)
  • University of Delaware (US)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
Corresponding author
Frankel, Anne S.
Venue
Journal of School Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-02-04
Volume
88
Issue
3
Pages
190-199
ISSN
  • 0022-4391 (ISSN-L)
  • 1746-1561
OpenAlex
W2786343260
Cited by
104
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 2
FWCI
20.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of School Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC‐RFA‐PS13‐1308)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
sexting, adolescent risk behavior, adolescent mental health, depressive symptoms, cyberbullying, suicide attempts, substance use, alcohol consumption, tobacco use, sexual activity, neighborhood safety, gender differences
MeSH terms
Academic Success, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Alcohol Drinking, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Pennsylvania, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk-Taking, Schools, Sexual Behavior, Sex Offenses, Suicide, Attempted, Substance-Related Disorders, Bullying, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review