Understanding Racial Disparities in Police Use of Lethal Force: Lessons from Fatal Police‐on‐Police Shootings
Abstract
During a 29‐year period studied by a government task force, 10 off‐duty police officers were found to have been mistaken for civilians and fatally shot by another police officer. Eight of these officers were Black, one was Hispanic, and one was White. Given that at least 75% of U.S. police officers in this period were White, we estimate that there is a roughly one in one million chance that this disparity reflects a random deviation from a condition in which Black and White officers faced the same risk of being fatally shot by another officer while off duty. Estimates of the magnitude of this racial disparity must be interpreted cautiously, but the increased risk faced by Black officers while off duty compared to their White counterparts appears to be even larger than the racial disparity among civilians killed by police officers. The disparity is much less pronounced in mistaken‐identity fatal shootings of on‐duty officers, of which two were Black, one was Hispanic, and 12 were White. These incidents are rare, but they comprise an important subset of all police interactions because they are known errors that involve a misperception of threat, and because the differential patterns of racial disparities suggest that there are situational factors that vary systematically and contribute to the observed outcomes. We examine fatal, mistaken identity police‐on‐police shootings and explore potential explanations for the dramatic racial disparity among officers killed while off duty.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Conditional on being killed by police, Black compared to White decedents are less likely to have been armed.
“Conditional on being killed by police, Black compared to White decedents are also less likely to have been armed (Charbonneau et al., 2017)”
From Racial Disparities in Police Use of Deadly Force Against Unarmed Individuals Persist After Appropriately Benchmarking Shooting Data on Violent Crime Rates (2021) · cites this paper as Charbonneau et al., 2017
Unarmed individuals are killed by police at rates that reflect racial disparities.
“it is also the case that unarmed individuals are killed by police at rates that reflect racial disparities.”
From Racial Disparities in Police Use of Deadly Force Against Unarmed Individuals Persist After Appropriately Benchmarking Shooting Data on Violent Crime Rates (2021) · cites this paper as Charbonneau et al., 2017
Conditional on being shot by police, a White suspect is more likely to be armed than is a Black suspect.
“Ross (2015) and Charbonneau et al. (2017), for example, show that conditional on being shot by police, a White suspect is more likely to be armed than is a Black suspect.”
From Racial Disparities in Police Use of Deadly Force Against Unarmed Individuals Persist After Appropriately Benchmarking Shooting Data on Violent Crime Rates (2021) · cites this paper as Charbonneau et al., 2017
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810 · see citing works
Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention
Devine, P. G., Forscher, P. S., Austin, A. J., & Cox, W. T. L. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.06.003 · Cited by 1,259 · see citing works
A Bird's Eye View of Civilians Killed by Police in 2015: Further Evidence of Implicit Bias
Nix, J., Campbell, B. A., Byers, E. H., & Alpert, G. P. (2017) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12269 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Precinct or prejudice? Understanding racial disparities in New York City’s stop-and-frisk policy
Goel, S., Rao, J. M., & Shroff, R. (2016) · The Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/15-aoas897 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ross, C. T., Winterhalder, B., & McElreath, R. (2021) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550620916071 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
“Several approaches have been used to control for this important covariate, including direct study of police-onpolice shootings (Charbonneau et al., 2017), multivariate regression analyses (e.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
- Authors
- Charbonneau, A., Spencer, K., & Glaser, J.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Charbonneau, Amanda
- ORCID
- Glaser, Jack
- Venue
- Journal of Social Issues
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-12
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 744-767
- ISSN
- 0022-4537 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4560
- OpenAlex
- W2775127998
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 6
- FWCI
- 14.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Social Issues (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Keywords
- police use of deadly force, racial disparities, Black police officers, fatal police shootings, racial bias in policing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review