CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 27Feminist Epistemology and Gender StudiesMental Health and PsychiatryMental Health Treatment and Access

Patronizing Depression: Epistemic Injustice, Stigmatizing Attitudes, and the Need for Empathy

Jackson, Jake·2017·Journal of Social Philosophy
DOI 10.1111/josp.12194
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/josp.12194

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neurotypicals often display patronizing attitudes toward neurodivergent people.

    “especially since neurotypicals often display patronizing attitudes toward neurodivergent people (Jackson, 2017)”

    From Neurodiversity, epistemic injustice, and the good human life (2022) · cites this paper as Jackson, 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jackson, J.
Corresponding author
Jackson, Jake
Venue
Journal of Social Philosophy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-09
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
359-376
ISSN
  • 0047-2786 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9833
DOI
10.1111/josp.12194
OpenAlex
W2751069684
Cited by
27
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 5 d)
Locations
Journal of Social Philosophy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
depression, epistemic injustice, stigmatizing attitudes, empathy, paternalism, mental health stigma, epistemic authority

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review