Cited by 15Sensory Analysis and Statistical MethodsFermentation and Sensory AnalysisMeat and Animal Product Quality

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sensory characterization of specific wood smoke aromas and their contributions to smoked Cheddar cheese flavor

Del Toro‐Gipson, Rachel S., Rizzo, Peter V., Hanson, Dana J., Drake, MaryAnne·2020·Journal of Sensory Studies

Abstract

This study characterized the sensory properties of different wood smokes and their application to smoked Cheddar cheese flavor. Sniff jars of wood smokes were created by exposing filter paper to 23°C smoke (cold smoke). Sensory attributes for nine wood smokes (apple, alder, cedar, cherry, hickory, maple, mesquite, oak, and pecan) were generated by a trained panel followed by projective mapping of the different wood smoke aromas. Four distinct wood smokes (mesquite, cherry, hickory, and cedar) were selected for cold smoking of 30 day old Cheddar cheeses. Cheeses were cold smoked at 23°C followed by descriptive analysis of flavor attributes using the trained panel. Nonparametric and parametric statistical analyses were applied to the collected data. Twelve attributes were selected to describe wood smoke aromas. The sensory descriptors for the cold smokes cited most often included: sweet aromatic, charcoal/charred, guaiacol, meaty, vanillin, and fresh tobacco. Mesquite, cherry, hickory, and cedar smokes were the most distinct smokes by projective mapping, and these smokes also imparted distinct flavors to smoked Cheddar cheeses. The mesquite smoked cheese was characterized by high smoke aroma and the highest meaty/brothy flavor, the cherry smoked cheese was distinguished by campfire/marshmallow flavor, the hickory smoked cheese had high campfire/marshmallow and meaty flavors, and the cedar smoked cheese was characterized by an intense resinous flavor. The determination of sensory properties of different wood smokes demonstrates the differences in specific smoke flavor contributions to cheese. Furthermore, the determination of the sensory properties specific to smoked cheese will provide a platform to understand consumer perception of smoked cheeses. Practical Applications: Smoked foods are a growing category. This study demonstrated that smokes from different wood sources have distinct aromas that can be differentiated and that these distinct smoke aromatics are imparted to cheeses exposed to different wood smokes. Results from this study provide a sensory language to differentiate aromatics from different wood smokes and may be useful to product developers and food manufacturers seeking to position and differentiate smoked foods.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/joss.12564

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Maga J. A., 1988, Smoke in food processing

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 15

Metadata

Authors
Del Toro‐Gipson, R. S., Rizzo, P. V., Hanson, D. J., & Drake, M.
Affiliations
  • Department of Food, Bioprocessing and Nutrition Sciences Southeast Dairy Foods Research Center, North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina
  • North Carolina State University (US)
Corresponding author
Drake, MaryAnne
Venue
Journal of Sensory Studies
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-02-07
Volume
35
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0887-8250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-459X
OpenAlex
W3005077438
Cited by
15
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Sensory Studies (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Hilmar Cheese
  • Dairy West
  • National Dairy Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
Keywords
cold smoking, sensory characterization, projective mapping, guaiacol, smoked foods, consumer perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review