Cited by 19Dental Health and Care UtilizationPediatric health and respiratory diseasesHIV/AIDS oral health manifestations

Influences on preschool children's oral health-related quality of life as reported by English and Spanish-speaking parents and caregivers

Born, Catherine D., Divaris, Kimon, Zeldin, Leslie P., Rozier, R. Gary·2016·Journal of Public Health Dentistry

Abstract

Objective: This study examined young, preschool children's oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL) among a community‐based cohort of English and Spanish‐speaking parent–child dyads in North Carolina, and sought to quantify the association of parent/caregiver characteristics, including spoken language, with OHRQoL impacts. Methods: Data from structured interviews with 1,111 parents of children aged 6–23 months enrolled in the Zero‐Out Early Childhood Caries study in 2010–2012 were used. OHRQoL was measured using the overall score (range: 0–52) of the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS). We examined associations with parents' sociodemographic characteristics, spoken language, self‐reported oral and general health, oral health knowledge, children's dental attendance, and dental care needs. Analyses included descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate methods based upon zero‐inflated negative binomial regression. To determine differences between English and Spanish speakers, language‐stratified model estimates were contrasted using homogeneity χ2 tests. Results: The mean overall ECOHIS score was 3.9 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.6–4.2]; 4.7 among English‐speakers and 1.5 among Spanish speakers. In multivariate analyses, caregivers' education showed a positive association with OHRQoL impacts among Spanish speakers [prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.12 (95% CI = 1.03–1.22), for every added year of schooling], whereas caregivers' fair/poor oral health showed a positive association among English speakers (PR = 1.20; 95% CI = 1.02–1.41). Conclusions: The overall severity of ECOHIS impacts was low among this population‐based sample of young, preschool children, and substantially lower among Spanish versus English speakers. Further studies are warranted to identify sources of these differences in – actual or reported – OHRQoL impacts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jphd.12152

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Born, C. D., Divaris, K., Zeldin, L. P., & Rozier, R. G.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Born, Catherine D.
Venue
Journal of Public Health Dentistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-03-16
Volume
76
Issue
4
Pages
276-286
ISSN
  • 0022-4006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-7325
OpenAlex
W2298103524
Cited by
19
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4
FWCI
6.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Public Health Dentistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01DE018236)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Pediatric health and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › HIV/AIDS oral health manifestations
Keywords
oral health-related quality of life, preschool children, Spanish-speaking families, language barriers, caregiver education, early childhood caries, ECOHIS, dental care needs, dental attendance, oral health knowledge, parent-child dyads
MeSH terms
Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Language, Male, North Carolina, Oral Health, Parents, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Socioeconomic Factors, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review