Cited by 105Innovation Diffusion and ForecastingDigital Platforms and EconomicsTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

The Role of Early Adopters in the Diffusion of New Products: Differences between Platform and Nonplatform Innovations

Frattini, Federico, Bianchi, Mattia, De Massis, Alfredo, Sikimic, Uros·2014·Journal of Product Innovation Management

Abstract

This paper takes a contingency view to investigate how the role of early adopters (EAs) in the diffusion process changes between platform and nonplatform innovations, what launch decisions firms take to leverage the role of EAs, and how these decisions change between platform and nonplatform innovations. Relying on an exploratory multiple case study of eight industrial product innovations launched in Italy in the 2000s, the paper suggests that the EAs of these innovations play two distinct roles in the diffusion process. The first role, called dissemination, sees EAs triggering and bolstering the propagation of information regarding their opinion about the value for money, properties, advantages, and disadvantages of the new product after they have bought and applied it in their operations. The second role, labeled imitation, consists of EAs inadvertently communicating to later buyers the fact that they have bought the new product, which propels imitative behavior and thus subsequent adoption. A key finding of the paper, which supports a contingency view of innovation diffusion, is that the dissemination role played by EAs has an impact on the adoption of platform innovations, whereas the imitation one is the mechanism through which EAs stimulate subsequent adoption in the case of nonplatform new products. Furthermore, the paper's results point to a constructive view of the process of launching an innovation, whereby firms target at launch different segments of EAs, whose ide…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jpim.12108

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frattini, F., Bianchi, M., De Massis, A., & Sikimic, U.
Corresponding author
Frattini, Federico
Venue
Journal of Product Innovation Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-10-08
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
466-488
ISSN
  • 0737-6782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-5885
OpenAlex
W2141404298
Cited by
105
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
5.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Product Innovation Management (publishedVersion)
  • Aisberg (University of Bergamo) (submittedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
early adopters, diffusion of innovations, platform innovation, product launch decisions, imitation, dissemination, competitive disadvantage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review