Cited by 34Food Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsHomelessness and Social IssuesFood Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics

Food insecurity in adults with severe mental illness: A systematic review with meta‐analysis

Open access
Smith, Jo, Stevens, Heidi, Lake, Amelia A., Teasdale, Scott, Giles, Emma L.·2024·Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing

Abstract

Introduction: Food insecurity in adults living with Severe Mental Illness (SMI) is an underresearched area worldwide. Aim: This systematic review and meta‐analysis aimed to identify and collate evidence on food insecurity in adults with SMI, in high‐ and upper‐middle income countries. Method: A comprehensive electronic search was completed up to August 2022. Random effects meta‐analysis was undertaken to determine the prevalence and the odds ratio for food insecurity in adults with SMI. Narrative synthesis explored the data further. Results: Sixteen publications were included (13 in the meta‐analysis). The prevalence estimate of food insecurity in adults with SMI was 41% (95% CI: 29% to 53%, I2 = 99.9%, n = 13). Adults with SMI were 3.31 (95% CI: 2.03 to 5.41) times more likely to experience food insecurity than comparators without SMI (z = 6.29, p < .001, I2 = 98.9%, n = 6). Food insecurity appears to be a risk factor for developing SMI. Discussion: This review suggests adults with SMI living in high‐ or upper‐middle income countries are more likely to experience food insecurity than the general population and that this relationship may be inverse. Implications for practice: Mental health practitioners should be aware of food insecurity and support individuals with SMI to access sufficient food.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jpm.12969

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, J., Stevens, H., Lake, A. A., Teasdale, S., & Giles, E. L.
Affiliations
  • Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Teesside University (GB)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Smith, Jo
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-08-24
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
133-151
ISSN
  • 1351-0126 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2850
OpenAlex
W4386153510
Cited by
34
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Teesside University Research Portal (Teesside University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • TeesRep (Teesside University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • World Bank Group
  • Strong
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR203466)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics
Keywords
food insecurity, severe mental illness, prevalence, risk factors, mental health, food access
MeSH terms
Food Insecurity, Adult, Mental Disorders, Humans, Mental Health, Risk Factors, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review